Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anti-agreement, anti-locality and minimality. The syntax of dislocated subjects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anti-agreement is the phenomenon whereby the morphosyntactic form of subject/verb agreement is sensitive to whether or not an agreeing subject has been locally extracted. This paper argues that, together with an anti-locality constraint on movement (Grohmann, 2003) which prohibits overly local movement as elaborated in (i–v), the occurrence of a canonically left dislocated subject in anti-agreement languages accounts for all syntax peculiar to the phenomenon in the Bantu language of Kinande: (i) subjects can extract long-distance even across islands; (ii) subjects are locally unextractable if the canonical subject/verb agreement occurs; (iii) local subject extraction requires a change in subject/verb agreement morphology; (iv) objects cannot locally extract even if they appear to do so; and (v) objects can extract long-distance; however, they are sensitive to islands. Evidence comes from an analysis of the distribution of nominal expressions in the language as well as in-depth examination of two different wh-question formation strategies in the language. This study also reveals that the last resort strategy in a language is relativized to what is first resort: if resumption is first resort, movement is last resort, and vice versa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anagnostopoulou E., van Riemsdijk H., Zwarts F. (1997). Materials on left dislocation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson S. (1993). Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language, 69, 68–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoun J. (1981). The formal nature of anaphoric relations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT

  • Aoun J. (1985). A grammar of anaphora. Cambridge MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun J., Benmamoun A. (1998). Minimality, reconstruction, and PF-movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29, 569–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Authier J.-M. (1988). Null object constructions in Kinande. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6, 19–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. (1985). The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 373–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker M. (1996) The polysynthesis parameter. New York, Oxford University Press

  • Baker M. (2003). Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In A. Carnie H. Harley, & M. A. Willie (Eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar (pp. 107–132). Linguistics Today 62, John Benjamins.

  • Bhatt R. (2002). Verb second. Class handout, available from http://ccwf.cc.utexas.edu/∼bhatt/ lin381l/l3.pdf.

  • Boeckx C. (2001). Mechanisms of chain formation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Boeckx C. (2003). Islands and chains: Resumption as stranding. Amsterdam, John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N. (1995). Categories and Transformations. In The minimalist program (pp. 219–394). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Chomsky N. (1999). Derivation by phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.

  • Chomsky N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In: Martin R., Michaels D., Uriagareka J. (Eds), Step by step: Essays in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 89–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung S. (1982). Unbounded dependencies in Chamorro grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 13, 39–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung S. (1998). The design of agreement: Evidence from Chamorro. Chicago, University of Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements G. (1984). Binding domains in Kikuyu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 14, 37–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins C. (1997). Local economy. Cambridge MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Dikken M. (2006). Relators and linkers. Cambridge MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Den Dikken M., Naess A. (1993). Case dependencies: The case of predicate inversion. The Linguistic Review 10, 303–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesing M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes M. (1992). On the status of Chamorro Wh-agreement. In J. Mead (Ed.), Proceedings of the WCCFL 11 (pp. 177–190) Stanford: CSLI.

  • Emonds J.P. (1970). Root and structure-preserving transformations, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Georgopoulos C. (1985). Variables in Palauan syntax. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 3, 59–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos C. (1991). Syntactic variables: Resumptive pronouns and A-binding in Palauan. Dordrecht, Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann K. (2000). Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Maryland, College Park.

  • Grohmann K. (2003). Prolific domains. On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam, John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohmann K. (2005). The road to PF. Handout from talk given at the 17th international symposium on theoretical and applied linguistics. Aristotle University, Thessaloniki Greece

  • Haïk I. (1990). Anaphoric, pronominal, and referential INFL. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 8, 347–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein N. (1995). Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornstein N. (2001). Move! A minimalist theory of construal. Oxford, Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Iatridou S. (1990). Clitics and Island effects. ms., MIT.

  • Jelinek E. (1984). Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 2, 39–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayne R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge MA, MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne R. (2005). Pronouns and their antecedents. In Movement and silence, chapter 6. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Li Y.-H.A. (1992). Dou: syntax or LF? Conference talk at the 4th North American conference on Chinese linguistics (NACCL). Michigan University, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranz A. (1993). Implications of asymmetries in double object constructions. In S. Mchombo (Ed.), Theoretical aspects of bantu grammar I (pp. 113–150). Stanford: CSLI Publications.

  • McCloskey J. (2002). Resumption, successive cyclicity, and the locality of operations. In Epstein S.D., Seely T.D., (Eds) Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program. Oxford, Blackwell, pp. 184–226

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis M. (1998). Locality in A-movement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Miyagawa S. (2005). On the EPP. In M. McGinnis & N. Richards (Eds.), Perspectives on phases (pp. 201–235). MIT Working papers in Linguistics 49, Cambridge, MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT

  • Ouhalla J. (1993). Subject-extraction, negation and the anti-Agreement effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 477–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips C. (1996). Disagreement between adults and children. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Diego. (Published 1998 in A. Mendikoetxea & M. Uribe-Etxebarria (Eds.,) Theoretical issues on the morphology-syntax interface (pp. 173–212). San Sebastian: ASJU.

  • Progovac L. (1993). Non-augmented NPs in Kinande as negative polarity items. In: Mchombo S. (Eds) Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar 1. Stanford, CSLI Publications, pp. 257–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards N. (1997). What moves where when in which language? Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.

  • Rizzi L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In: Haegeman L. (Eds) Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 281–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi L. (2002). Locality and left periphery. In: Belletti A. (Eds), Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures, vol 3. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 223–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (1988). Specifier/head agreement in Kinande. Handout from the Second Niger-Congo syntax and semantics workshop. Cambridge MA, MIT

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (1994). The syntax of clitic doubling in modern Greek. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, USC.

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (1995). Specifier/head agreement in Kinande. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa 23, 67–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (1998). A predication analysis of clitic pronouns in Greek. In: Tamanji P., Kusumoto K. (Eds) Proceedings of NELS 28. Amherst, GLSA, pp. 183–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (1999). A successive cyclic account of anti-agreement effects in Kinande. Handout from the Annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Los Angeles, CA.

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (2000). Anti-agreement and the fine structure of the left edge. In R. Ai et al. (Eds.), Working papers in linguistics 6 (pp. 94–114). Irvine: Department of Linguistics, University of California

  • Schneider-Zioga P. (2002). The case of anti-agreement. In A. Rackowski & N. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of AFLA 8: The eighth meeting of the Austronesian formal linguistics association (pp. 325–339). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 44 Cambridge, MA: MIT.

  • Tuller L. (1985). Tense features and operators in Hausa. In Rapport de Recherches du Groupe de Linguistique Africaniste. (pp. 493–516). année 1985–1986, Montréal: Department of Linguistics, University of Quebec at Montreal

  • Van Riemsdijk H., Zwarts (1997). Left dislocation in Dutch and status of copying rules. In: Anagnostopoulou E.F. et al. (Eds) Materials on left dislocation. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Vikner S. (1995). Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel J. (1892). Ueber ein Gesetz der Indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschung, 1, 333–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwart C.J.-W. (2005). Verb second as a function of merge. In: den Dikken M., Tortora C. (Eds), The function of function words and functional categories. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 11–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubizarreta M.L. (1999). The cl(itic) projection in questions. In Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. The Catalan working papers (pp. 253–277).

  • Zubizarreta M.L. (2001). The constraint on preverbal subjects in romance interrogatives: A minimality effect. In: Hulke A., Pollock J-Y. (Eds), On romance inversion. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 183–204

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of English, Comparitive Literature, and Linguistics, California State University, Fullerton University Hall 322, Fullerton, California, 92634, USA

    Patricia Schneider-Zioga

Authors
  1. Patricia Schneider-Zioga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia Schneider-Zioga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider-Zioga, P. Anti-agreement, anti-locality and minimality. The syntax of dislocated subjects. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 25, 403–446 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9014-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-006-9014-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation