Abstract
Industrial activities are linked through international supply chains, and the impacts that one country experiences can easily influence other countries. Climate change has made it essential for countries to review their supply chains and to prioritize introducing concrete adaptation actions. Therefore, this study aims to demonstrate a method of screening imported products that are highly vulnerable to the impacts of climate change by assessing all imported products in a consistent manner throughout the global supply chain to support a country’s adaptation strategy planning. The study focuses on the potential impacts on land use and human health of climate change effects such as floods and heat waves. Japan was selected for a detailed analysis of its imports. A life-cycle assessment technique was applied to evaluate imported products through their supply chains. In Japan’s case, land use results show that agricultural products imported from the United States of America (US) are highly vulnerable to climate change impacts. In relation to imported meat products, feed production processes are most vulnerable. The human health results show in addition to agricultural imports, electronics and textile imports are also vulnerable. The study recommends that the relevant stakeholders impacted by these products scrutinize their supply chains. Especially, Japan is recommended to collaborate with the US, China, and Southeast Asian countries for increasing resilience to climate change. The results include uncertainties due to limitations of data availability and methodology; however, this method is also applicable to assessing the global trade activities of any country and to supporting global adaptation strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aelker J, Bauernhansl T, Ehm H (2013) Managing complexity in supply chains: a discussion of current approaches on the example of the semiconductor industry. Procedia CIRP 7:79–84. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2013.05.014
Berkhout F, Hertin J, Gann DM (2006) Learning to adapt: organisational adaptation to climate change impacts. Clim Chang 78:135–156. doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9089-3
Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY (2008) The global component of freshwater demand and supply: an assessment of virtual water flows between nations as a result of trade in agricultural and industrial products. Water Int 33:19–32. doi:10.1080/02508060801927812
Fleming A, Hobday AJ, Farmery A et al (2014) Climate change risks and adaptation options across Australian seafood supply chains—a preliminary assessment. Clim Risk Manag 1:39–50. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2013.12.003
Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Bunce A et al (2014) The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia. Reg Environ Chang. doi:10.1007/s10113-014-0648-2
Haraguchi M, Lall U (2014) Flood risks and impacts: a case study of Thailand’s floods in 2011 and research questions for supply chain decision making. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.09.005
Henigan M, Wührl K (2013) Revision of ISO 14001 environmental management systems—requirements with guidance for use. In: ISO/TC 207SC 1. http://www.iso.org/iso/1n1000_iso_14001_revision_information_note_update_november2013.pdf. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
Horiguchi K, Itsubo N (2011) Development of land use inventory using input-output analysis for life cycle assessment. Pap Environ Inf Sci 25:19–24
IPCC (2014) Summary for policy makers. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, summary for policymakers. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
ISO (2006) ISO 14040. Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva
Itsubo N (2012) Characterization and damage evaluation methods, LIME2: life-cycle impact assessment method based on endpoint modeling. Life Cycle Assess. forum Japan 47–90
Joshi S (1999) Product environmental life-cycle assessment using input-output techniques. J Ind Ecol 3:95–120. doi:10.1162/108819899569449
Kreft S, Eckstein D (2013) Global climate risk index 2014. Germanwatch e.V
Langholtz M, Webb E, Preston BL et al (2014) Climate risk management for the U.S. cellulosic biofuels supply chain. Clim Risk Manag 3:96–115. doi:10.1016/j.crm.2014.05.001
Lenzen M, Moran D, Bhaduri A et al (2013) International trade of scarce water. Ecol Econ 94:78–85. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.018
Lesnikowski AC, Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L et al (2013) How are we adapting to climate change? A global assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:277–293. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9491-x
Ministry of Finance (2006) Trade statistics of Japan. http://www.customs.go.jp/toukei/info/index_e.htm. Accessed 7 Apr 2015
Ministry of Health Labour and Welfare (2015) Monthly labour survey. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/database/db-l/monthly-labour.html. Accessed 7 Apr 2015
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication (2009) 2005 Input-output tables for Japan. http://www.soumu.go.jp/english/dgpp_ss/data/io/io05.htm. Accessed 7 Apr 2015
Nakano K (2015) Life-cycle assessment framework for adaptation planning to climate change: linking regional climate impact with product design. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:819–828. doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0867-x
Nakano K, Hirao M (2011) Collaborative activity with business partners for improvement of product environmental performance using LCA. J Clean Prod 19:1189–1197. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.03.007
Nansai K, Kondo Y, Kagawa S et al (2012) Estimates of embodied global energy and air-emission intensities of Japanese products for building a Japanese input-output life cycle assessment database with a global system boundary. Environ Sci Technol 46:9146–9154. doi:10.1021/es2043257
O’Brien KL, Leichenko RM (2000) Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization. Glob Environ Chang 10:221–232. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00021-2
Pearce TD, Ford JD, Prno J et al (2011) Climate change and mining in Canada. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16:347–368. doi:10.1007/s11027-010-9269-3
Purdue University (2013) GTAP data bases: detailed sectoral list. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/databases/contribute/detailedsector.asp. Accessed 10 Apr 2015
Pwc (2013) International threats and opportunities of climate change to the UK
Rosenzweig C, Parry ML (1994) Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367:133–138. doi:10.1038/367133a0
Royal Thai Government, The World Bank (2012) Thailand flooding 2554 rapid assessment for resilient recovery and reconstruction planning
Schmidhuber J, Tubiello FN (2007) Global food security under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:19703–19708. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701976104
The World Bank (2015) Data-indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/. Accessed 7 Apr 2015
think step (2015) GaBi LCA database documentation. In: Think step. http://database-documentation.gabi-software.com/. Accessed 10 Apr 2015
Tompkins EL, Eakin H (2012) Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 22:3–11. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.09.010
Tukker A, de Koning A, Wood R et al (2013) Exiopol—development and illustrative analyses of a detailed global MR EE SUT/IOT. Econ Syst Res 25:50–70. doi:10.1080/09535314.2012.761952
Tzilivakis J, Warner DJ, Green A, Lewis KA (2015) Adapting to climate change: assessing the vulnerability of ecosystem services in Europe in the context of rural development. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 20:547–572. doi:10.1007/s11027-013-9507-6
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (2015) Values and shares of merchandise exports and imports, annual, 1948-2013. http://unctadstat.unctad.org/EN/Index.html. Accessed 10 Apr 2015
Weidema BP, Bauer C, Hischier R, et al (2013) The ecoinvent database: overview and methodology, data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3. www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed 24 Apr 2015
Wheeler D (2011) Quantifying vulnerability to climate change : implications for adaptation assistance. New York 1–53
Zhang Y, Baral A, Bakshi BR (2010) Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. Environ Sci Technol 44:2624–2631. doi:10.1021/es900548a
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakano, K. Screening of climatic impacts on a country’s international supply chains: Japan as a case study. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 22, 651–667 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9692-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-015-9692-6