Skip to main content
Log in

Reform for the evolutionary social sciences or new theory of human nature?

Gillian Barker: Beyond Biofatalism: Human nature for an evolving world. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015, 176pp, $35.00 HB

  • Essay Review
  • Published:
Metascience Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Barker, G. 2015. Beyond Biofatalism: human nature for an evolving world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, H.C. 2015. The shape of thought: how mental adaptations evolve. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D. 2005. Adapting minds: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. 2013. What is a human universal? Human behavioral ecology and human nature. In Arguing about human nature, ed. S.M. Downes, and E. Machery, 71–80. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupre, J. 2001. Human nature and the limits of science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Futuyma, D.J. 1998. Evolutionary biology, 3rd ed. Sunderland: Sinauer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. 1996. Complexity and the function of mind in nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D.L. 1986. On human nature. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, J. 2000. The limits and lies of human genetic research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. 1985. Vaulting ambition: sociobiology and the quest for human nature. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. 1974. The analysis of variance and the analysis of causes. American Journal of Human Genetics 26: 400–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E. 2008. A plea for human nature. Philosophical Psychology 21: 321–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machery, E. ed. 2016. Human nature. In How biology shapes philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pinker, S. 2002. The blank slate: the modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, G. 2013. Human nature in a post-essentialist world. Philosophy of Science 80: 983–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 2012. The philosophy of human evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. 1980. Evolution, population thinking and essentialism. Philosophy of Science 47: 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabery, J. 2014. Beyond versus: the struggle to define the interaction of nature and nurture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 1990. On the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual. Jounral of Personality 58: 17–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., and L. Cosmides. 2005. Conceptual foundations of evolutionary psychology. In The handbook of evolutionary psychology, ed. D. Buss, 5–67. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. 1994. The moral animal: why we are, the way we are: the new science of evolutionary psychology. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen M. Downes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Downes, S.M. Reform for the evolutionary social sciences or new theory of human nature?. Metascience 25, 479–485 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0115-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-016-0115-4

Navigation