Abstract
Association studies suggest that TRβ1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Thyroid hormone receptors (TRs) mediate transcriptional responses through a highly conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD). We previously constructed an artificially modified human TRβ1 (m-TRβ1) via the introduction of a 108-bp exon sequence into the corresponding position of the wild-type human TRβ1 (TRβ1) DBD. Studies confirmed that m-TRβ1 was functional and could inhibit the proliferation of breast cancer MDA-MB-468 cells in vitro. To understand the role of m-TRβ1 in liver tumor development, we adopted a gain-of-function approach by stably expressing TRβ (m-TRβ1 and TRβ1) genes in a human hepatocarcinoma cell line, SK-hep1 (without endogenous TRβ), and then evaluated the effects of the expressed TRβ on cancer cell proliferation, migration, and tumor growth in cell-based studies and xenograft models. In the presence of 3,5,3-l-triiodothyronine (T3), the expression of TRβ in SK-hep1 cells inhibited cancer cell proliferation and impeded tumor cell migration through the up-regulation of 4-1BB, Caspase-3, and Bak gene expression; down-regulation of Bcl-2 gene expression; and activation of the Caspase-3 protein. TRβ expression in SK-hep1 led to less tumor growth in xenograft models. Additionally, the anti-tumor effect of m-TRβ1 was stronger than that of TRβ1. These data indicate that m-TRβ1 can act as a tumor suppressor in hepatocarcinoma and its role was significantly better than that of TRβ1.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
TRs are members of a superfamily that comprises the nuclear receptors and ligand-dependent transcription factors that mediate the biological actions of thyroid hormone (T3) in differentiation, growth, development, and the maintenance of metabolic homeostasis [1, 2]. TRs are encoded by two human genes, namely, THRA and THRB; furthermore, four DNA- and T3-binding isoforms, namely, TRα1, TRβ1, TRβ2, and TRβ3 (only present in rat), are generated by alternative mRNA splicing and differential promoter usage [2]. These isoforms are functional receptors and share a common structure in several regions ranging from the N-terminus to the C-terminus: an N-terminal activation domain (A/B), a conserved DNA-binding domain (DBD) (C), a hinge domain (D), and a ligand-binding domain (E/F). TRs regulate target gene transcription by interacting with specific DNA sequences, known as thyroid hormone response elements (TREs) [3]. Several recent studies have strongly suggested that TRβ plays an important role in cell proliferation and malignant transformation [4,5,6,7]. Low or even no expression of TRs and alterations in TR genes, especially TRβ1, have been identified in many types of cancer [8,9,10,11,12]. Studies have also demonstrated that mutations in TRβ1 are closely associated with many cancers [13,14,15,16]. Many studies have confirmed that TRβ1 plays as a tumor suppressor in human cancers [17,18,19].
We previously identified a novel rat TRβ (rTRβ) isoform with an extra-large DBD, named TR beta delta (TRβΔ, GenBank number: DQ191165). rTRβΔ is highly homologous to rat TRβ1 (rTRβ1) and contains an additional 108 nucleotides or 36 amino acids in the DBD, which alters this highly conserved domain [20]. Nevertheless, studies have demonstrated that rTRβΔ is a functional TR, that rTRβΔ has transcription factor characteristics, and that rTRβΔ exhibits a greater tumor-suppressive ability in vitro than rTRβ1. Subsequently, we constructed an artificial m-TRβ1 by introducing this new 108-bp exon into the DBD of human TRβ1. m-TRβ1 was functional in MDA-MB-468 cells and inhibited MDA-MB-468 cell proliferation by promoting apoptosis in the presence of T3. However, the roles of m-TRβ1 in other cancer cell lines in vitro and in tumorigenesis in vivo are currently unknown.
In the present study, we adopted a gain-of-function approach by expressing the human TRβ (m-TRβ1 and TRβ1) gene in human hepatocarcinoma cells, namely, SK-hep1. We stably expressed the TRβ gene in SK-hep1 cells and evaluated the effects of TRβ expression on cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and tumor development in xenograft models. We found that TRβ gene expression in the presence of T3 promoted SK-hep1 apoptosis, inhibited SK-hep1 proliferation, and impeded migration. These inhibitory responses were mediated by the up-regulation of 4-1BB, Caspase-3, and Bak gene expression, down-regulation of Bcl-2 gene expression, and activation of the Caspase-3 protein due to the expression of TRβ. Moreover, the expression of TRβ in SK-hep1 significantly reduced SK-hep1 tumor growth in xenograft models. Further analysis indicated that the effects of m-TRβ1 were stronger than those of TRβ1. Thus, m-hTRβ1 could act as a tumor suppressor in hepatocarcinoma cells.
Materials and methods
Animals and reagents
A human hepatocarcinoma cell line (SK-hep1) was obtained from the Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai, China). 293T cells and lentiviral vector GV358 were purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China). DMEM was purchased from Gibco (CA, USA). The Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit, the NE-PER™ nuclear and cytoplasmic extraction reagents, and thyroid hormone receptor beta-1 antibody were purchased from (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA). Other reagents were obtained as follows: GAPDH antibody (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); the Bcl-2, 4-1BB, Bak, Histone H3, and active Caspase-3 antibodies (Bioss, Beijing, China); the TRIzol total RNA extraction reagent, the In-Fusion™ PCR cloning kit, and quantitative real-time PCR detection kit (Takara, Dalian, China); M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, CA, USA); KOD-Plus-Ver polymerase (TOYOBO, Tokyo, Japan); the Caspase-3 spectrophotometric assay kit (NANJING KEYGEN BIOTECH. CO., LTD, Nanjing, China); and MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (Promega, Beijing, China). Four-week-old female BALB/c nude mice (15–18 g) were obtained from Shanghai Lingchang BioTech CO., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Protocols involving animals used in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Weifang Medical University.
In vitro experiments
Construction of GV358-TRβ1 and GV358-m-TRβ1 vectors
Using PCR, we obtained the total sequence of wild-type human TRβ1 (TRβ1) and artificially modified the human TRβ1 (m-TRβ1) cDNA from pcDNA3.1-wt-hTRβ1 and pcDNA3.1-m-hTRβ1 (previously constructed and stored by our team). The forward primer was 5′-GAGGATCCCCGGGTACCGGTCGCCACCATGACTCCCAAC AGTATGACAG-3′, and the reverse primer was 5′-TCCTTGTAGTCCATACCATCCTCGAACACTTCCAAGAAC-3′. The PCR product was directionally cloned into the lentiviral vector GV358, which was linearized with Age I with the In-Fusion™ PCR cloning kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The constructed expression vectors, namely, GV358-TRβ1 and GV358-m-TRβ1, were confirmed via sequence analysis.
Viral packaging
The GV358-TRβ1, GV358-m-TRβ1, or GV358 empty vector plasmid was co-transfected with the Helper 1.0 and Helper 2.0 packaging helper plasmids (GeneChem, Shanghai, China) into 293T cells with a mass ratio of 4:3:2. The culture supernatants were harvested at 48 h post-transfection to purify the lentiviruses expressing TRβ1, m-TRβ1, or the control. The lentiviruses were purified via ultracentrifugation (Beckman, CA, USA) at 25,000 rpm for 2 h at 4 °C, and the viral titers were measured with endpoint dilution by ELISA (the HIV-1 p24 Antigen ELISA 2.0 assay kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions). SK-hep1 cells were infected with concentrated viruses (GV358-TRβ1, GV358-m-TRβ1, or GV358 empty vector) at a multiplicity of infection of 10, and the infection solution was discarded 12 h after infection. Because the lentivirus vector contained GFP, the infection efficiency was determined by observing GFP-positive cells under a fluorescence microscope 72 h after infection. At 72 h post-infection, the SK-hep1 cells that stably expressed TRβ1 (SK-hep1-TRβ1) and m-TRβ1 (SK-hep1-m-TRβ1) were used for subsequent experiments. SK-hep1 cells were infected with the empty vector GV358 and served as control cells (SK-hep1-Neo). A portion of these cells was collected for Western blot. The total protein was resolved by 10% SDS–PAGE and transferred from the gel to PVDF membranes. The PVDF membranes were blocked for non-specific reactivity with TBS-T containing 5% non-fat milk for 2 h at room temperature (RT) and then incubated with primary antibodies (TRβ1 or H3, 1:1000 dilution) at 4 °C overnight. TRβ1 recognizes an epitope in the A/B domain of TRβ1, namely, amino acid residues 1-101, which comprises a common sequence between TRβ1 and m-TRβ1. After thoroughly washes in TBS-T, the membranes were incubated with the secondary HRP antibodies (anti-mouse, 1:5000 dilution) for 1.5 h at RT. After thorough washes with TBS-T, the membranes were visualized using enhanced chemiluminescence and Kodak films (Kodak, Rochester, USA).
Cell proliferation and apoptosis assays
MTT assays were employed to measure cell proliferation. SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 104/mL into 96-well plates, and then, 10 nM T3 was added to the intervention groups. After 48 h, a sterile-filtered MTT solution (20 µL, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well, followed by incubation for 4 h at 37 °C. Then, the formazan crystals were solubilized in dimethyl sulfoxide. The absorbance at 570 nm was recorded using a microplate reader (BIO-RAD, CA, USA), and the background absorbance at 630 nm was subtracted.
SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were seeded in 12-well plates, and then, 10 nM T3 was added to the intervention groups. After 48 h of culture, cells were harvested and stained with FITC-conjugated Annexin V and propidium iodide for 10 min at RT and detected by flow cytometry (BD, New Jersey, USA).
Wound healing assay
SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were seeded at 1 × 106 cells per well in six-well plates. A pipette tip was used to introduce wounds to confluent cells, plates were washed with PBS, and culture medium (without serum) was added. Cells were further cultured in the medium with or without T3 (10 nM). At regular intervals, a camera system with an inverted microscope was used to visualized cell migration at ×100 magnification. The migration rate was quantified by measuring the distances between the edges of wound, and the percentage of migration was determined as the ratio of the migrated distance to the initial distance of the wound [21].
Real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) and Western blot
SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were seeded in 6-well plates, and then, 10 nM T3 was added to the intervention groups. After 48 h, the cells were harvested for total RNA and protein extractions. Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol reagent. mRNA (2 µg) was reverse transcribed into total cDNA in a 20 µL reaction mixture, and the mRNA levels of 4-1BB, Bcl-2, Bak, and Caspase-3 were analyzed by RT-qPCR, using the Gapdh gene as a reference gene. PCR reactions were performed in iQ5TM (BIO-RAD, USA) and detected with SYBR Green. The primers for each gene are shown in Table 1. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 56 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. The CT values of all genes from the different samples were gathered, and the raw data were calibrated to the data for Gapdh. The mRNA of each sample was normalized, and the relative expression level of each gene was represented as \({2^{ - \Delta \Delta {C_{\text{T}}}}}.\)
Western blot analysis was carried out as described above. The primary antibodies used were against TRβ1 (1:1000), GAPDH (1:1000), Bcl-2 (1:100), active Caspase-3 (1:200), and Bak (1:100).
Caspase-3 activity assay
SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were seeded in 6-well plates, and then, 10 nM T3 was added to the intervention groups. After 48 h, the cells were lysed in RIPA buffer, and the total protein concentration of each lysate was determined using the BCA protein assay kit from PIERCE (PIERCE, USA). Caspase-3 activity was measured using the Caspase-3 spectrophotometric assay kit according to manufacturer’s instructions.
In vivo experiments
BALB/c nude mouse transplantation
Four-week-old female BALB/c nude mice were purchased from Shanghai Lingchang BioTech CO., Ltd [Certificate of Quality No: SCXK (Shanghai) 2013-0018]. Mice were housed four per cage and provided with free access to water, food, and bedding at all times. The mice were randomly separated into three groups comprising ten mice: (1) the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cell group, (2) the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cell group, and (3) the SK-hep1-Neo cell group. SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were digested and respectively implanted into the skin of the right forelimb armpit of each nude mouse in a total volume of 200 µL (4 × 106) cells resuspended in D-Hanks without fetal bovine serum (FBS), under aseptic conditions. Two weeks after cell inoculation, primary tumor outgrowth was monitored three times per week by measuring the tumor width (W) and length (L) with a digital caliper. The tumor volume was calculated as follows: π/6 × L × W × W. Tumor growth was evaluated up to day 56 after cell inoculation. Eight weeks after inoculation, the tumor-bearing mice were anesthetized with Peltobalrbitalum Natricum, imaged using the Small Animal Live Imaging System (Berthold Technologies, Germany), and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The tumors were removed, weighed, and used to examine the parameters described below.
Western blot and immunohistochemical analysis
Two samples were randomly selected from each group to extract total protein for the detection of TRβ1 and m-TRβ1 protein. The Western blot analysis was carried out as described above. The tumor tissue was fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24 h and then embedded in paraffin. Four-micrometer sagittal sections were made and processed for immunohistochemistry according to a standard protocol. Primary antibodies used were against active Caspase-3 (dilution 1:200), 4-1BB (1:50 dilution), Bcl-2 (1:200 dilution), and Bak (1:200 dilution). Staining was developed with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Cells that were positive for active Caspase-3, 4-1BB, Bcl-2, or Bak were counted for quantitative analysis.
Statistical analysis
All measurement data are expressed as the mean ± SD and were analyzed with SPSS 17.0. The single-factor analysis of variance was used for the multigroup comparisons. Each result was compared using the Student–Newman–Keuls test. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Generation of wt-TRβ1 and m-TRβ1 lentiviral expressing vectors
A full-length coding sequence of TRβ1 (1386 bp) or m-TRβ1(1494 bp) was directionally cloned into the GV358 lentiviral vector to obtain the GV358-TRβ1 expression plasmid. This sequence was completely consistent with the sequence published in GenBank and with the GV358-m-TRβ1 expression plasmid. The sizes of the TRβ1 and m-TRβ1 proteins were approximately 52 and 57 kD, respectively, as predicted from the aa sequence, and the proteins were expressed in SK-hep1 cells (without endogenous TRβ1 and m-hTRβ1) (Fig. 1a). GFP was used as a reporter gene. GV358 (empty vector, TRβ1 or m-TRβ1) was successfully transduced into SK-hep1 cells since more than 80% of the cells in each group were GFP-positive by fluorescence microscopy at 72 h post-infection (Fig. 1b).
m-TRβ1 inhibits the growth and migration of SK-hep1 cells
To elucidate the functional consequences of the re-expression of m-TRβ1 in SK-hep1 cells, we generated SK-hep1 cells that stably expressed TRβ (TRβ1, m-TRβ1) or control SK-hep1 cells that stably expressed the empty vector GV358 (Neo). The protein abundance of TRβ in the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells was confirmed by Western blot analysis (Fig. 2a), whereas no TRβ was detected in the control SK-hep1-Neo cells (Fig. 2a). When the cells were cultured in medium containing 10 nM T3 without FBS, cancer cell proliferation was clearly lower for SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells than for SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-Neo cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2b). Significant differences were also observed between SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-Neo cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 2b), whereas no T3 effect was observed on the proliferation of the SK-hep1-Neo cells that did not express TRβ.
As shown in Fig. 2c, d, T3 had no apparent effect on the cell migration of SK-hep1-Neo cells. Interestingly, in the absence of T3, the migration rates of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 and SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells were similar to that of the SK-hep1-Neo cells. However, in the presence of T3, the migration rates of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells were significantly slower than those of the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells without T3. In the presence of 10 nM T3, the inhibition of cell migration by m-TRβ1 was stronger than that by TRβ1 (Fig. 2c–d). Quantitative analysis showed that migration was significantly inhibited in both groups (p < 0.05). Data are presented as the mean ± SD, and the p values are shown.
m-hTRβ1 promotes the apoptosis of SK-hep1 cells
To understand how m-hTRβ1 expression inhibited SK-hep1 cell growth and migration in vitro, the effects of m-TRβ1 on SK-hep1 cell apoptosis were measured. SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells were cultured with or without T3. Flow cytometric analysis showed that cancer cell apoptosis was clearly higher among the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells than among the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-Neo cells (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3a). Significant differences were also observed between the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells and SK-hep1-Neo cells (p < 0.05); however, no T3 effect on the apoptosis of the Neo cells was observed (Fig. 3a). These flow cytometric analysis results prompted us to evaluate how the expression of m-TRβ1 promoted the apoptosis of SK-hep1. Therefore, the levels of apoptosis-related genes were estimated by RT-qPCR. The RT-qPCR results showed that compared with the control Neo cells, in the presence of T3, m-hTRβ1 and TRβ1 caused a drastic increase in the 4-1BB, Bak, and Caspase-3 mRNA levels and a reduction in the Bcl-2 mRNA level in SK-hep1 cells (p < 0.05); moreover, the effects of m-hTRβ1 were stronger than those of TRβ1 in the presence of 10 nM T3 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3b). The Western blot results also showed that the expression levels of the 4-1BB, Bak, active Caspase-3, and Bcl-2 proteins (Fig. 3c) were consistent with the corresponding mRNA levels described above. Caspase-3 activity was also verified in cultured SK-hep1 cells using the Caspase-3 spectrophotometric assay kit. Compared with the control SK-hep1-Neo cells, in the presence of T3, the m-hTRβ1 and TRβ1 cells showed a gradual but significant up-regulation in Caspase 3 activity (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3d).
m-TRβ1 expression inhibits SK-hep1 cell tumor growth in mouse xenograft models
To ascertain the role of m-TRβ1 in SK-hep1 cells, we inoculated SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells into nude mice. A nude mouse xenograft model of human hepatocarcinoma was established, and the tumor formation rate was 100%. As shown in Fig. 4a, b, the size of the tumor derived from the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells was clearly smaller than that of the tumor derived from the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, and the size of the tumor derived from the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells was clearly smaller than that of the tumor derived from the control Neo cells. As demonstrated by the quantitative comparison shown in Fig. 4c, the tumor weights of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 and SK-hep1-TRβ1 tumors were significantly lower than those of the SK-hep1-Neo tumors (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). As shown in Fig. 4d, the tumor growth rates of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 and SK-hep1-TRβ1 tumors were markedly slower than the growth rate of the control SK-hep1-Neo tumors. Among the three groups, the tumor growth rate of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumor group was lowest.
SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells inoculated into the nude mice expressed GFP, so GFP expression was observed with the in vivo biofluorescence imaging system. The total amount of fluorescence in the area was used to indirectly reflect the number of fluorescently labeled cells or the size of the tumor volume. All nude mice were euthanized on the 56th day, and the mean fluorescence intensity of GFP was determined using the small animal live imaging system. The mean fluorescence intensity of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells group was the lowest among the three groups (p < 0.05) (Fig. 5a, b). Consistent with the cell-based findings described above, the in vivo results indicated that m-TRβ1 could act as a tumor suppressor in SK-hep1 cells and that the effects of m-TRβ1 were significantly stronger than those of TRβ1.
We assessed whether the slow growth of the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumors resulted from increased apoptosis. First, we confirmed that the TRβ1 and m-TRβ1 proteins were expressed in the SK-hep1-TRβ1 and SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumors but not in the SK-hep1-Neo control tumors (Fig. 6a). Second, apoptosis-related proteins were confirmed by immunohistochemical analysis of active Caspase-3, 4-1BB, Bak, and Bcl-2 as markers in the tumors derived from the SK-hep1-TRβ1 cells, SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 cells, and SK-hep1-Neo cells. Only a few cells within the SK-hep1-Neo tumors were stained with the anti-active Caspase-3, 4-1BB and Bak antibodies (Fig. 6b, panel a–c). However, more cells within the SK-hep1-TRβ1 tumors than within the SK-hep1-Neo tumors were stained with the anti-active Caspase-3, 4-1BB, and Bak antibodies (Fig. 6b, panel e–g), and most cells within the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumors were intensely stained with the anti-active Caspase-3, 4-1BB, and Bak antibodies (Fig. 6b, panel i–k). More cells in the SK-hep1-Neo tumors (Fig. 6b, panel d) than in the SK-hep1-TRβ1 (Fig. 6b, panel h) and SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumors (Fig. 6b, panel l) were stained positively for Bcl-2. Among the three groups, the positive staining rate in the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumors was lowest. The number of positively stained cells was counted, and the quantitative data are shown in Fig. 6c. Taken together, these data indicated that more tumor cells were underwent apoptosis in the SK-hep1-m-TRβ1 tumors and that increased apoptotic activity in the m-TRβ1 tumors contributed to decreased tumor growth.
Discussion
Previous studies that have shown a close association between the reduced expression and high mutation rate of the TRβ1 gene and several human cancers support the hypothesis that TRβ1 can act as a tumor suppressor [8,9,10,11,12,13]. TRβ1 was previously shown to suppress tumor invasiveness and metastasis in human liver hepatocarcinoma cells (TR-deficient). When TRβ1 was re-expressed in these cells, cell proliferation and migration were inhibited in vitro, and tumor growth was suppressed in xenograft models [21]. We previously constructed an artificially modified human TRβ1 (m-hTRβ1) via the introduction of an extra 108-bp exon sequence into the corresponding position of the wild-type human TRβ1 (TRβ1) DBD. Studies have shown that m-TRβ1 can function as a tumor suppressor in a human breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-468, in vitro. At present, the detailed effects and mechanisms of m-TRβ1 in human hepatocarcinoma cells are unclear.
In the present study, we further showed that m-TRβ1 could also act as a tumor suppressor in another cancer cell line, namely, the SK-hep1 human hepatocarcinoma cell line. We adopted a gain-of-function approach by expressing TRβ (m-TRβ1 and TRβ1) in SK-hep1 cells. In vitro, the re-expression of TRβ in SK-hep1 cells increased apoptosis, decreased cell proliferation, and impeded cancer cell migration. Moreover, in addition to these cell-based results, we showed that the growth of tumors derived from TRβ-expressing SK-hep1 cells in xenograft models was inhibited in vivo. The abovementioned effects of m-TRβ1 were significantly stronger than those of TRβ1. Studies have shown that TRβ1 can inhibit the proliferation and migration of hepatocarcinoma cells and other cancer cells [2, 4, 6, 15, 23,24,25]. Cell apoptosis is a complicated biological process that is associated with complex signaling pathway responses. The activation of cysteine proteases, particularly caspases, is a key intracellular regulator of cell apoptosis, and Caspase-3 is an important mediator of apoptosis [26]. TRβ expression induces apoptosis in breast cancer cells via an increase in cleaved PARP and Caspase-3 levels [27,28,29]. One study has shown that thyroid hormone induces the expression of 4-1BB, which encodes a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily protein, and the activation of caspases in a thyroid hormone receptor-dependent manner [30]. Bak is a gene that promotes tumor cell apoptosis and belongs to the Bcl-2 gene family. Bak can promote apoptosis by inhibiting the anti-apoptotic activity of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl or by activating a pathway that is similar to that of the TNF death receptors. The involvement of pro-apoptotic Bak in the course and treatment of hepatocarcinoma has been reported [31, 32]. The level of Bak is reduced or even non-detectable in hepatocarcinoma cells, and this reduction in Bak contributes to the development and progression of hepatocarcinoma [33, 34]. In the present study, we found that in the presence of T3, m-TRβ1 inhibited proliferation and migration and promoted the apoptosis of SK-hep1 cells by up-regulating Caspase-3, 4-1BB, and Bak expression, increasing Caspase-3 activity and down-regulating Bcl-2 expression (see Figs. 3, 6). The present study also demonstrates that the expression of m-TRβ1 impedes SK-hep1 tumor development in vivo (see Figs. 4, 5). At the same time, the abovementioned effects of m-TRβ1 are obviously stronger than those of TRβ1. These results suggest that modification of the DBD region may alter the TRβ activation intensity of target genes. Thus, the present study provides evidence to support the idea that m-TRβ1 can act as a tumor suppressor in human hepatocarcinoma development and progression. Other potential mechanisms that may underlie the m-TRβ1-mediated anti-proliferative effect await further studies in the future.
Our study demonstrates that m-TRβ1 expression in SK-hep1 cells decreases cancer cell proliferation, impedes tumor cell migration, and inhibits tumor growth in vivo by up-regulating Caspase-3, 4-1BB, and Bak expression, increasing Caspase-3 activity, and down-regulating Bcl-2 expression. In addition, the anti-tumor effects of m-TRβ1 are significantly stronger than those of TRβ1. These findings indicate that m-TRβ can act as a tumor suppressor in hepatocarcinoma.
References
Cheng SY, Leonard JL, Davis PJ (2010) Molecular aspects of thyroid hormone actions. Endocr Rev 31:139–170. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2009-0007
Kim WG, Zhao L, Kim DW, Willingham MC, Cheng SY (2014) Inhibition of tumorigenesis by the thyroid hormone receptor β in xenograft models. Thyroid 24:260–269. https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2013.0054
Paquette MA, Atlas E, Wade MG, Yauk CL (2014) Thyroid hormone response element half-site organization and its effect on thyroid hormone mediated transcription. PLoS ONE 9:e101155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101155
Zhu L, Tian G, Yang Q, De G, Zhang Z, Wang Y, Nie H, Zhang Y, Yang X, Li J (2016) Thyroid hormone receptor β1 suppresses proliferation and migration by inhibiting PI3K/Akt signaling in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep 36:1419–1426. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2016.4931
García-Silva S, Martínez-Iglesias O, Ruiz-Llorente L, Aranda A (2011) Thyroid hormone receptor β1 domains responsible for the antagonism with the ras oncogene: role of corepressors. Oncogene 30:854–864. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.464
Martínez-Iglesias O, Olmeda D, Alonso-Merino E, Gómez-Rey S, González-López AM, Luengo E, Soengas MS, Palacios J, Regadera J, Aranda A (2016) The nuclear corepressor 1 and the thyroid hormone receptor β suppress breast tumor lymphangiogenesis. Oncotarget 7:78971–78984. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.12978
Kim WG, Cheng SY (2013) Thyroid hormone receptors and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 1830:3928–3936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.04.002
Ling Y, Shi X, Wang Y, Ling X, Li Q (2014) Down-regulation of thyroid hormone receptor β1 gene expression in gastric cancer involves promoter methylation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 444:147–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.012
Rosignolo F, Maggisano V, Sponziello M, Celano M, Di Gioia CR, D’Agostino M, Giacomelli L, Verrienti A, Dima M, Pecce V, Durante C (2015) Reduced expression of THRβ in papillary thyroid carcinomas: relationship with BRAF mutation, aggressiveness and miR expression. J Endocrinol Investig 38:1283–1289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0309-4
Master A, Wójcicka A, Piekiełko-Witkowska A, Bogusławska J, Popławski P, Tański Z, Darras VM, Williams GR, Nauman A (2010) Untranslated regions of thyroid hormone receptor beta 1 mRNA are impaired in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta 1802:995–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.07.025
Tseng YH, Huang YH, Lin TK, Wu SM, Chi HC, Tsai CY, Tsa MM, Lin YH, Chang WC, Chang YT, Chen WJ, Lin KH (2013) Thyroid hormone suppresses expression of stathmin and associated tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep 6:38756. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38756
Charalampoudis P, Agrogiannis G, Kontzoglou K, Kouraklis G, Sotiropoulos GC (2017) Thyroid hormone receptor alpha (TRa) tissue expression in ductal invasive breast cancer: a study combining quantitative immunohistochemistry with digital slide image analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 43:1428–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2017.05.012
Zhu XG, Zhao L, Willingham MC, Cheng SY (2010) Thyroid hormone receptors are tumor suppressors in a mouse model of metastatic follicular thyroid carcinoma. Oncogene 29:1909–1919. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.476
Park JW, Zhao L, Willingham MC, Cheng SY (2017) Loss of tyrosine phosphorylation at Y406 abrogates the tumor suppressor functions of the thyroid hormone receptor β. Mol Carcinog 56:489–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.22511
Park JW, Zhao L, Willingham M, Cheng SY (2015) Oncogenic mutations of thyroid hormone receptor β. Oncotarget 6:8115–8131
Ling Y, Ling X, Fan L, Wang Y, Li Q (2015) Mutation analysis underlying the downregulation of the thyroid hormone receptor β1 gene in the Chinese breast cancer population. Onco Targets Ther 8:2967–2972. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S93418
Liao CH, Yeh CT, Huang YH, Wu SM, Chi HC, Tsai MM, Tsai CY, Liao CJ, Tseng YH, Lin YH, Chen CY, Chung IH, Cheng WL, Chen WJ, Lin KH (2012) Dickkopf 4 positively regulated by the thyroid hormone receptor suppresses cell invasion in human hepatoma cells. Hepatology 55:910–920. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.24740
Guigon CJ, Kim DW, Zhu X, Zhao L, Cheng SY (2010) Tumor suppressor action of liganded thyroid hormone receptor beta by direct repression of beta-catenin gene expression. Endocrinology 151:5528–5536. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2010-0475
Park JW, Zhao L, Webb P, Cheng SY (2014) Src-dependent phosphorylation at Y406 on the thyroid hormone receptor β confers the tumor suppressor activity. Oncotarget 5:10002–100016
Zhao RL, Sun B, Liu Y, Li JH, Xiong WL, Liang DC, Guo G, Zuo AJ, Zhang JY (2014) Cloning and identification of a novel thyroid hormone receptor β isoform expressed in the pituitary gland. Mol Cell Biochem 389:141–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-013-1935-9
Kim WG, Zhu X, Kim DW, Zhang L, Kebebew E, Cheng SY (2013) Reactivation of the silenced thyroid hormone receptor β gene expression delays thyroid tumor progression. Endocrinology 154:25–35. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1728
Martinez-Iglesias O, Garcia-Silva S, Tenbaum SP, Regadera J, Larcher F, Paramio JM, Vennstrom B, Aranda A (2009) Thyroid hormone receptor beta1 acts as a potent suppressor of tumor invasiveness and metastasis. Cancer Res 69:501–509. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2198
Ruiz-Llorente L, Martínez-Iglesias O, García-Silva S, Tenbaum S, Regadera J, Aranda A (2011) The thyroid hormone receptors as tumor suppressors. Horm Mol Biol Clin Investig 5:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/HMBCI.2010.045
Wu SM, Cheng WL, Liao CJ, Chi HC, Lin YH, Tseng YH, Tsai CY, Chen CY, Lin SL, Chen WJ, Yeh YH, Huang CY, Chen MH, Yeh YC, Lin KH (2015) Negative modulation of the epigenetic regulator, UHRF1, by thyroid hormone receptors suppresses liver cancer cell growth. Int J Cancer 137:37–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29368
Chi HC, Liao CH, Huang YH, Wu SM, Tsai CY, Liao CJ, Tseng YH, Lin YH, Chen CY, Chung IH, Wu TI, Chen WJ, Lin KH (2013) Thyroid hormone receptor inhibits hepatoma cell migration through transcriptional activation of Dickkopf 4. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 439:60–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.08.028
Mu R, Lu N, Wang J, Yin Y, Ding Y, Zhang X, Gui H, Sun Q, Duan H, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Ke X, Guo Q (2010) An oxidative analogue of gambogic acid-induced apoptosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 is involved in its anticancer activity in vitro. Eur J Cancer Prev 19:61–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328333fb22
Park JW, Zhao L, Cheng SY (2013) Inhibition of estrogen-dependent tumorigenesis by the thyroid hormonereceptor β in xenograft models. Am J Cancer Res 3:302–311
Shi XZ, Jin X, Xu P, Shen HM (2014) Relationship between breast cancer and levels of serum thyroid hormones and antibodies: a meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15:6643–6647
Gu G, Gelsomino L, Covington KR, Beyer AR, Wang J, Rechoum Y, Huffman K, Carstens R, Andò S, Fuqua SA (2015) Targeting thyroid hormone receptor beta in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 150:535–545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-015-3354-y
Yamada-Okabe T, Satoh Y, Yamada-Okabe H (2003) Thyroid hormone induces the expression of 4-1BB and activation of caspases in a thyroid hormone receptor-dependent manner. Eur J Biochem 270:3064–3073
Zhang Q, Ma S, Liu B, Liu J, Zhu R, Li M (2016) Chrysin induces cell apoptosis via activation of the p53/Bcl-2/caspase-9 pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Exp Ther Med 12:469–474
Zhang Q, Ma S, Liu B, Liu J, Zhu R, Li M (2016) DMFC (3,5-dimethyl-7H-furo[3,2-g]chromen-7-one) regulates Bim to trigger Bax and Bak activation to suppress drug-resistant human hepatoma. Apoptosis 22:381–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-016-1331-5
Rousseau B, Ménard L, Haurie V, Taras D, Blanc JF, Moreau-Gaudry F, Metzler P, Hugues M, Boyault S, Lemière S, Canron X, Costet P, Cole M, Balabaud C, Bioulac-Sage P, Zucman-Rossi J, Rosenbaum J (2007) Overexpression and role of the ATPase and putative DNA helicase RuvB-like 2 in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 46:1108–1118
Ye CG, Chen GG, Ho RLK, Merchant JL, He ML, Lai PBS (2013) Epigenetic upregulation of Bak by ZBP-89 inhibits the growth of hepatocellularcarcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833:2970–2979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.08.001
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 81770915 and 81301737) and the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation, China (Nos. ZR2012HQ034, ZR2015HL025, ZR2016BL19, and ZR2015HM028).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RZ designed the project, contributed to all experiments and to writing the manuscript. XP contributed to all experiments and to writing the manuscript. YZ was mainly responsible for the analysis of data and for writing the manuscript. YS, WS, XM, and CZ conducted the experiments. All authors read and provided their approval for the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Database linking
GenBank: DQ191165.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Peng, X., Zhou, Y., Sun, Y. et al. Overexpression of modified human TRβ1 suppresses the growth of hepatocarcinoma SK-hep1 cells in vitro and in xenograft models. Mol Cell Biochem 449, 207–218 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-018-3357-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-018-3357-1