Abstract
Taking the problem of perception and illusion as a leading clue, this article presents a new phenomenological approach to perception and the world: “holism of experience.” It challenges not only Husserl’s transcendentalism, but also what remains of it in Heidegger’s early thought, on the grounds that it is committed to the skeptical inference: “Since we can always doubt any perception, we can always doubt perception as a whole.” The rejection of such an implicit inference leads to a relational paradigm of Being-in-the-World that differs from Heidegger’s on many points.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Heidegger (1999, p. 61) [Below Heidegger’s Gesamtausgabe is abbreviated GA #, p. #].
Ibid., p. 5.
Heidegger (1992, p. 157); GA 20, p. 211.
Boehm (1959, p. 486).
Ingarden (1975, p. 21). [“Streichen wir das reine Bewusstsein, so streichen wir die Welt.”].
BT, pp. 246–247; SZ, p. 202.
BT, p. 271 [trans. slightly modified—Tr.]; SZ, p. 229.
GA 56/57, p. 92.
Heidegger (1988 p. 170); GA 24, p. 241.
BT, pp. 255–256; SZ, p. 212.
BT, p. 251; SZ, p. 208.
BT, p. 34; SZ 13.
Heidegger (1988, p. 216); GA 24, p. 308.
Heidegger (1988, p. 166); GA 24, p. 237.
Heidegger (1984, p. 169); GA 26, p. 217.
Husserl (1997, p. 12); Hua 16, p. 15.
Husserl (1997, p. 13); Hua 16, p. 16.
Husserl (1982, p. 332); Hua 3.1, p. 320.
Husserl (1973, p. 17); Hua 1, p. 57.
Qtd. by Merleau-Ponty (1962, p. 334).
Ibid., p. 340 [trans. modified—Tr.].
Merleau-Ponty (1962, pp. 344, 339, 342, respectively).
Ibid., xvi.
Ibid., p. 207. See also BT, p. 251: “But what distinguishes this assertion [“the external world is Really present-at hand”] is the fact that in realism there is a lack of ontological understanding. Indeed realism tries to explain Reality ontically by Real connections of interaction between things that are Real.”
Merleau-Ponty (1962, pp. 49, 363–364, 369); “The return to perceptual experience… puts out of court all forms of realism,” Ibid., p. 47.
Heidegger (1984, p. 192); GA 26, 248–249.
References
Austin, J.L. 1962. Sense and sensibilia. London: Oxford University Press.
Boehm, R. 1959. Les ambiguïtés des concepts husserliens d’’immanence’ et de ‘transcendance’. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 84: 481–526.
Dilthey, W. 1992. Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. 7, Der Aufbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschaften.Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner, Göttingen, Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 229.
Dilthey, W. 2002. In The formation of the historical world in the human sciences, ed. R.A. Makkreel, and F. Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heidegger, M. 1962. Being and time (trans: John Macquarrie, and Edward Robinson). New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M. 1984. The metaphysical foundations of logic (trans: Michael Heim). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. 1986. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Heidegger, M. 1988. The basic problems of phenomenology (trans: Richard Rojcewicz, and André Schuwer). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. 1992. History of the concept of time: Prolegomena (trans: Theodore Kisiel). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Heidegger, M. 1994. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 20, Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. 1997. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 24, Die Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. 1999. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 56/57, Zur Bestimmung der Philosophie. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Heidegger, M. 2007. Gesamtausgabe, Bd. 26. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Frankfurt a.M.: Vittorio Klostermann.
Hinton, J.M. 1973. Experiences. An inquiry into some ambiguities. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Husserl, E. 1973. Cartesian meditations. An introduction to phenomenology (trans: Dorion Cairns). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, E. 1982. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy (First Book, trans: Kersten, F.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Husserl, E. 1997. Thing and space: Lectures of 1907 (trans: Richard Rojcewicz). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Husserl, E. 1998. The Paris lectures (trans: Peter Koestenbaum). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Ingarden, R. 1975. On the motives which led Husserl to transcendental idealism (trans: Arnór Hannibalsson). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
McDowell, J. 1998. Criteria, defeasibility and knowledge. In meaning, knowledge and reality, 369–394. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Colin Smith). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Putnam, H. 1999. The threefold cord: Mind, body and world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by Michael B. Smith, Berry College (smithster@gmail.com).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Romano, C. Challenging the transcendental position: the holism of experience. Cont Philos Rev 44, 1–21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9165-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11007-011-9165-x