Skip to main content
Log in

Multiple-Point Simulation with an Existing Reservoir Model as Training Image

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The multiple-point simulation (MPS) method has been increasingly used to describe the complex geologic features of petroleum reservoirs. The MPS method is based on multiple-point statistics from training images that represent geologic patterns of the reservoir heterogeneity. The traditional MPS algorithm, however, requires the training images to be stationary in space, although the spatial distribution of geologic patterns/features is usually nonstationary. Building geologically realistic but statistically stationary training images is somehow contradictory for reservoir modelers. In recent research on MPS, the concept of a training image has been widely extended. The MPS approach is no longer restricted by the size or the stationarity of training images; a training image can be a small geometrical element or a full-field reservoir model. In this paper, the different types of training images and their corresponding MPS algorithms are first reviewed. Then focus is placed on a case where a reservoir model exists, but needs to be conditioned to well data. The existing model can be built by process-based, object-based, or any other type of reservoir modeling approach. In general, the geologic patterns in a reservoir model are constrained by depositional environment, seismic data, or other trend maps. Thus, they are nonstationary, in the sense that they are location dependent. A new MPS algorithm is proposed that can use any existing model as training image and condition it to well data. In particular, this algorithm is a practical solution for conditioning geologic-process-based reservoir models to well data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Caers J, Zhang T (2004) Multiple-point geostatistics: a quantitative vehicle for integration of geologic analogs into multiple reservoir models. In: Integration of outcrop and modern analog data in reservoir models. AAPG memoir, vol 80, pp 383–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Chugunova T, Hu LY (2008) Multiple-point simulations constrained by continuous auxiliary data. Math Geosci 40(2):133–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly C, Caers J (2010) Multi-point geostatistics—an introductory overview. First Break 28(9):39–47

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries L, Carrera J, Falivene O, Gratacos O, Slooten L (2009) Application of multiple point geostatistics to non-stationary images. Math Geosci 41(1):29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guardiano F, Srivastava M (1993) Multivariate geostatistics: beyond bivariate moments. In: Soares A (ed) Geostatistics Troia’92. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Honarkhah M, Caers J (2012) Direct pattern-based simulation of non-stationary geostatistical models. Math Geosci 44(6):651–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LY, Chugunova T (2008) Multiple-point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: a comprehensive review. Water Resour Res 44:W11413. doi:10.1029/2008WR006993

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu LY, Blanc G, Noetinger B (2001) Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of sequential stochastic simulations. Math Geol 33(4):475–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu LY, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Scheepens C, Bouchard A (2013) Updating multipoint simulations using the ensemble Kalman filter. Comput Geosci 51:7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journel A (2005) Beyond covariance: the advent of multiple-point geostatistics. In: Leuanthong O, Deutsch CV (eds) Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 225–233

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y (2006) Using the SNESIM program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Comput Geosci 32:1544–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariethoz G, Kelly BFJ (2011) Modeling complex geological structures with elementary training images and transform-invariant distances. Water Resour Res 47:W07527. doi:10.1029/2011WR010412

    Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar J, Renard P, Mariethoz G, Froidevaux R, Besson O (2011) An improved parallel multiple-point algorithm using a list approach. Math Geosci 43:305–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S (2002) Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiplepoint statistics. Math Geol 34(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strebelle S, Zhang T (2005) Non-stationary multiple-point geostatistical models. In: Leuanthong O, Deutsch CV (eds) Geostatistics Banff 2004. Springer, Berlin, pp 235–244

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Boucher A, Zhang T (2008) A SGeMS code for pattern simulation of continuous and categorical variables: FILTERSIM. Comput Geosci 34(12):1863–1876

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the ConocoPhillips management for its permission to publish this work and to the three reviewers of the manuscript and the editors of this Special Issue for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Y. Hu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hu, L.Y., Liu, Y., Scheepens, C. et al. Multiple-Point Simulation with an Existing Reservoir Model as Training Image. Math Geosci 46, 227–240 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9488-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-013-9488-8

Keywords

Navigation