Skip to main content
Log in

Wavelet Analysis and Filtering to Identify Dominant Orientations of Permeability Anisotropy

  • Special Issue
  • Published:
Mathematical Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An accurate representation of permeability anisotropy is needed to model the rate and direction of groundwater flow correctly. We develop a wavelet analysis technique that can be used to characterize principal directions of anisotropy in both stationary and non-stationary permeability fields. Wavelet analysis involves the integral transform of a field using a wavelet as a kernel. The wavelet is shifted, scaled, and rotated to analyze different locations, sizes, and orientations of the field. The wavelet variance is used to identify scales and orientations that dominate the field. If the field is non-stationary, such that different zones of the field are characterized by different dominant scales or orientations, the wavelet variance can identify all dominant scales and orientations if they are distinct. If the dominant scales and orientations of different zones are similar, the wavelet variance identifies only the dominant scale and orientation of the primary zone. In this paper, we present a combined wavelet analysis and filtering approach to identify all dominant scales and orientations in a non-stationary permeability field. We apply the method to permeability data obtained in the laboratory from the Massillon sandstone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderman ER, Kipp KL, Hill MC, Valstar, Neupauer RM (2002) MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. geological survey modular ground-water model—documentation of the model-layer variable-direction horizontal anisotropy (LVDA) capability of the hydrogeologic-unit flow (HUF) package. U.S. Geological Survey, Open file Report 02-409

  • Antoine J, Murenzi R, Vandergheynst P, Ali ST (2004) Two-dimensional wavelet and their relatives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckwith CW, Baird AJ, Heathwaite AL (2003) Anisotropy and depth-related heterogeneity of hydraulic conductivity in a bog peat. II: Modelling the effects on groundwater flow. Hydrol Process 17:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton WC, Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Lindsey BD, Gburek WJ (2002) Influence of fracture anisotropy on groundwater ages and chemistry, Valley and Ridge Province, Pennsylvania. Ground Water 40(3):242–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Candès EJ, Donoho DL (1999) Ridgelets: a key to higher-dimensional intermittency? Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 357:2495–2509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen XH, Chen X (2003) Effects of aquifer anisotropy on the migration of infiltrated stream water to a pumping well. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 8(5):287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chui CK (1992) An introduction to wavelets. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets. Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Donoho DL, Flesia AG (2003) Digital ridgelet transform based on true ridge functions. In: Welland GV (ed.) Beyond wavelets. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Farge M (1992) Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 24:395–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genereux D, Bandopadhyay I (2001) Numerical investigation of lake bed seepage patterns: effects of porous medium and lake properties. J Hydrol 241(3–4):283–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM (1989) An introduction to applied geostatistics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Foufoula-Georgiou E (1997) Wavelet analysis for geophysical applications. Rev Geophys 35(4):385–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lark RM, Webster R (2004) Analysing soil variation in two dimensions with the discrete wavelet transform. Eur J Soil Sci 55:777–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neupauer RM, Powell KL, Qi X, Lee DH, Villhauer DA (2006) Characterization of permeability anisotropy using wavelet analysis. Water Resour Res 42:W07419. doi:10.1029/2005WR004364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell KL (2004) Wavelet analysis of permeability anisotropy. Master’s Thesis, University of Virginia, 89 pp

  • Tidwell VC, Wilson JL (2000) Heterogeneity, permeability patterns, and permeability upscaling: physical characterization of a block of Massillon Sandstone exhibiting nested scales of heterogeneity. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 3(4):283–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 79(1):61–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roseanna M. Neupauer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Watkins, L., Neupauer, R.M. & Compo, G.P. Wavelet Analysis and Filtering to Identify Dominant Orientations of Permeability Anisotropy. Math Geosci 41, 643–659 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9231-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-009-9231-7

Keywords

Navigation