Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy

  • Published:
Materials Science Aims and scope

The surfaces of 5083 aluminum alloy were coated with chromate conversion coatings. Then epoxy paints were applied to the chromate and nonchromate treatment surfaces. The adhesion, hardness, and corrosion resistance of the coated samples were evaluated by using adhesion tape tests, pencil hardness tests, salt spray, and electrochemical technique. The results indicated that the adhesion of coating systems (including chromate treatment) was better than the adhesion of nonchromate conversion coatings, whereas the hardness of the coating systems was identical. The salt-spray results showed that the corrosion propagation from the scratched area in the painted samples with chromate treatment was lower than for the nonchromate coated surfaces. In addition, the electrochemical corrosion measurements indicated that the coating system including chromate treatment presented lower corrosion current densities, higher polarization resistance, and less negative corrosion potential than the corresponding values obtained for the nonchromate conversion coated surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Lin, Z. Nie, H. Huang, and B. Li, “Annealing behavior of a modified 5083 aluminum alloy,” Mater. Design, 31, 1607–1612 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. K. Mishra and R. Balasubramaniam, “Corrosion inhibition of aluminum alloy AA 2014 by rare-earth chlorides,” Corr. Sci., 49, 1027–1044 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Ezuber, A. E. Houd, and F. El-Shawesh, “A study on the corrosion behavior of aluminum alloys in seawater,” Mater. Design, 29, 801–805 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. A. Kumar, M. Alagar, and V. Mohan, “Studies on corrosion-resistant behavior of siliconized epoxy interpenetrating coatings over mild steel surface by electrochemical methods,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 11, 123–126 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. M. Alanazi, A. Leyland, A. L. Yerokhin, and A. Matthews, “Substitution of hexavalent chromate conversion treatment with a plasma electrolytic oxidation process to improve the corrosion properties of ion-vapor deposited AlMg coatings,” Surf. Coat. Technol., in Press (2010).

  6. M. Oki and E. Charles, “Chromate conversion coating on Al–0.2 wt.% Fe alloy,” Mater. Lett., 63, 1990–1994 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Lu, E. T. Ada, and G. Zangari, “Investigation of the effect of chromate conversion coatings on the corrosion resistance of Ni based alloys,” Electrochem. Acta, 49, 1461–1473 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Wery, M. D. P. Wery, M. Feki, and H. F. Ayedi , “Application of a factorial design to study a chromate-conversion process,” J. Coat. Technol. Res., 7, 39–47 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. V. Andreva and D. G. Shchukin, “Smart self-repairing protective coating,” Mater. Today, 11, 24–30 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. A. D. N. Crespo, E. O. Bustamante, A. M. T. Huerta, et al., “Synthesis and characterization of chromate conversion coatings on galvalume and galvanized steel substrates,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 40, 1631–1644 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ak. Eshaghi.

Additional information

Published in Fizyko-Khimichna Mekhanika Materialiv, Vol.48, No.2, pp.47–50, March–April, 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eshaghi, A., Eshaghi, A. Effect of chromate conversion coatings on the adhesion and corrosion resistance of painted 5083 aluminum alloy. Mater Sci 48, 171–175 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-012-9487-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11003-012-9487-9

Keywords

Navigation