References
Bergkvist, L. (2015). Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay. Marketing Letters. doi:10.1007/s11002-014-9325-y.
Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multi-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44, 175–84.
deJong, M. G., Lehmann, D. R., & Netzer, O. (2012). State-dependence effects in surveys. Marketing Science, 31, 838–854.
Desarbo, W., Lehmann, D. R., & Hollman, F. (2004). Modeling dynamic effects in repeated-measures experiments involving preference/choice. Applied Psychological Measurement, 28(3), 186–209.
Johnson, M. D., Donald, R. L., & Horne, D. R. (1990). The effects of fatigue on judgments of interproduct similarity. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 7(1), 35–43.
Kamakura, W. A. (2015). “Measure once and cut twice” The carpenter’s rule still applies. Marketing Letters.
Kopalle, P. K., & Donald R. Lehmann (1997). Alpha inflation? The effect of eliminating scale items on coefficient alpha. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70, 189–97.
Lehmann, D. R., Keller, K. L., & Farley, J. U. (2008). The structure of survey-based brand metrics. Journal of International Marketing, 16(4), 29–56.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böckenholt, U., Lehmann, D.R. On the limits of research rigidity: the number of items in a scale. Mark Lett 26, 257–260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9373-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9373-y