Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Corporate governance effectiveness along the entrepreneurial process of a family firm: the role of private equity

  • Published:
Journal of Management & Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper was motivated by the increasing interest in the corporate governance debate on how effective structure and processes may influence entrepreneurial transitions. Along the entrepreneurial process, little research to date has investigated the exit in the context of entrepreneurial family firms. Previous literature has considered the exit mainly as a failure for entrepreneurial families, but when uncertainties arise this choice may enable ownership transitions, thus facilitating survival and long term strategies. Among the exit options, a private equity buyout may balance the family’s wealth protection and the firm’s future growth. However, which family specific characteristics and strategic needs may affect the exit option still remains a neglected topic. Drawing on corporate governance literature and recent research addressing entrepreneurship in family firms, this paper investigates, by a single case study, the bridging role of private equity buyout for going through entrepreneurial transitions. Findings suggest that a private equity buyout is a governance mechanism that may sustain an entrepreneurial transition by realigning family interests and goals. It may also allow the family commitment for improving organizational capabilities required by an entrepreneurial transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguilera, R. V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies and complementarities. Organization Science, 19(3), 475–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H., & Cliff, J. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Furr, N. R. (2007). What makes a process a capability? Heuristics, strategy and effective capture of opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunninge, O., Nordquist, M., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Corporate governance and strategic change in SMES’s: The effects of ownership, board composition and top management teams. Small Business Economics, 29, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Social research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Suarez, K. Dee, Saa-Perez, P., & Garcia-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a re source- and knowledge based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14, 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Zietsma, C., Saparito, P., Matherne, B. P., & Davis, C. (2005). A tale of passion: New insights into entrepreneurship from a parenthood metaphor. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G., & Mosakowski, E. (1987). The career dynamics of self-employment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 570–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chirico, F., & Nordqvist, M. (2010). Dynamic capabilities and trans-generational value creation in family firms: The role of organizational culture. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 487–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. A. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2007). Private equity, leveraged buyouts, and governance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 439–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1095–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, A. (2011). Private equity investment decisions in family firms: The role of human resources and agency costs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J. (2014). The case study method in family business research: Guidelines for qualitative scholarship. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: Theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2012). Impact of founder experience on exit intentions. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 352–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Chandler, G. N. (2015). Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: A typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing, 30, 255–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, G. V., & Handler, W. (1994). Entrepreneurship and family business: Exploring the connections. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 71–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 545–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I. (2007). Corporate governance and the firm’s dynamics: Contingencies and complementarities. Journal of Management Studies, 44(6), 1041–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., & Nakajima, C. (2010). Internal and external corporate governance: An interface between an organization and its environment. British Journal of Management, 21, 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., & Toms, M. (2003). Corporate governance, strategy and survival in a declining industry: A study of UK cotton textile companies. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 895–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatotchev, I., Toms, S., & Wright, M. (2006). The firm’s strategic dynamics and corporate governance life cycle. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 256–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., & Schulze, W. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 899–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, L. A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Pistrui, J. (2002). Enterprising family domain: Family influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15(3), 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Assessing the impact of management buyouts on economic efficiency: Plant-level evidence from the United Kingdom. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 148–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howorth, C., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2004). Buyouts, information asymmetry and the family-management dyad. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(4), 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2005). Accountability and creating accountability: A framework for exploring behavioural perspectives of corporate governance. British Journal of Management, 16, S65–S79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammerlander, N., Sieger, P., Voordeckers, W., & Zellweger, T. (2015). Value creation in family firms: A model of fit. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6, 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. (2006). Corporate venturing in family firms: Does the family matter? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 837–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Barnett, T., & Pearson, A. (2008). An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review, 21(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepner, E. (1991). The family and the firm: A coevolutionary perspective. Family Business Review, 4, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., Miller, D., & Steier, L. P. (2004). Toward an integrative model of effective FOB succession. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 305–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litz, R. A., & Kleysen, R. F. (2001). Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visons: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review, 14(4), 335–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. (2001). Grounded theory in management research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuleman, M., Amess, K., Wright, M., & Scholes, L. (2009). Agency, strategic entrepreneurship and the performance of private equity-backed buyouts. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1, 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niedermeyer, C., Jaskiewicz, P., & Klein, S. (2010). ‘Can’t get no satisfaction?’ Evaluating the sale of the family business from the family’s perspective and deriving implications for new venture activities. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 293–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, M., & Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 211–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordqvist, M., Wennberg, K., Baù, M., & Hellerstedt, K. (2013). An entrepreneurial process perspective on succession in family firms. Small Business Economics, 40(4), 1087–1122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogoff, E. G., & Heck, R. K. Z. (2003). Evolving research in entrepreneurship and family business: Recognizing family as the oxygen that feeds the fire of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 559–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C. (2004). Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. Journal of Private Equity, 7(3), 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvato, C., Chirico, F., & Sharma, P. (2010). A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 321–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, L., Wright, M., Westhead, P., & Bruining, H. (2010). Strategic changes in family firms post management buyout: Ownership and governance issues. International Small Business Journal, 28(5), 505–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Chrisman, J. J. (1999). Toward a reconciliation of the definitional issues in the field of corporate entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(3), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997). Strategic management of family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., & Chua, J. (2003). Predictors of satisfaction with the succession process in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 667–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Irving, P. G. (2005). Four bases of family business successor commitment: Antecedents and consequences. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(1), 13–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. & Manikutty, S. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: Role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 293–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Westhead, P. (2003). A longitudinal study of habitual entrepreneurs: Starts and acquirers. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 207–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, L., Wright, M., & Huse, M. (2007). Private firms and corporate governance: An integrated economic and management perspective. Small Business Economics, 29, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., & DeTienne, D. R. (2014). What do we really mean when we talk about ‘exit’? A critical review of research on entrepreneurial exit. International Small Business Journal, 32(1), 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2010). Reconceptualising entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westhead, P., Cowling, M., & Howorth, C. (2001). The development of family companies: Management & ownership imperatives. Family Business Review, 14(4), 369–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G., & Wright, M. (2009). Private equity: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 361–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Amess, K., Weir, C., & Girma, S. (2009). Private equity and corporate governance: Retrospect and prospect. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Burrows, A., Ball, R., Scholes L., Meuleman, M. & Amess, K. (2007). The implications of alternative investment vehicles for corporate governance: A survey of empirical research. Report prepared for the Steering Group on Corporate Governance, OECD, Paris.

  • Wright, M., Hoskisson, R., & Busenitz, L. (2001). Firm rebirth: Buyouts as facilitators of strategic growth and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Executive, 15(1), 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Hoskisson, R., Busenitz, L., & Dial, J. (2000). Entrepreneurship growth through privatisation: The upside of management buyouts. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 591–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research. Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., & Sharma, P. (2004). Family business research: A strategic reflection. Family Business Review., 17(4), 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellweger, T. M. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Allegri, 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy

    Paolo Di Toma

  2. Department of Economics “Marco Biagi”, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Berengario, 51, 41100, Modena, Italy

    Stefano Montanari

Authors
  1. Paolo Di Toma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stefano Montanari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paolo Di Toma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Toma, P., Montanari, S. Corporate governance effectiveness along the entrepreneurial process of a family firm: the role of private equity. J Manag Gov 21, 1023–1052 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9373-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-016-9373-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation