Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Interests and conflicts: exploring the context for early implementation of a dual language policy in one middle school

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dual language immersion program models represent a potentially effective way to serve growing numbers of English language learners (ELLs) in schools and districts. However, local challenges, such as interpersonal conflict, can impact the process of implementing dual language policies and programs, limiting the extent to which they are able to meet academic and equity goals for ELLs. Existing research provides little direct knowledge about how disagreements and competing interests influence dual language policies and programs. This study employs qualitative methods to examine how individuals understand and interpret the conflicts around a new dual language policy at one middle school. It presents a case study of local actors at the beginning of the implementation process, highlighting the tensions created by the interaction of policy with the material and ideological concerns of the individual actors. The findings describe how the interests of staff members both aligned and conflicted with each other and with the values embedded in the dual language policy. The study also reveals the influence of the local school district central office and brings to the surface disagreements amongst the staff about the appropriate role of the central office in the policy implementation process. This study suggests that the diverse material interests and ideologies of individual actors are important factors in the language policy implementation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. All names are pseudonyms.

References

  • Ball, S. J. (1990). Politics and policy making in education: Explorations in policy sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, W. S., Yarosz, D. J., Thomas, J., Jung, K., & Blanco, D. (2007). Two-way and monolingual English immersion in preschool education: An experimental comparison. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearse, C., & de Jong, E. (2008). Cultural and linguistic investment: Adolescents in a secondary two-way immersion program. Equity & Excellence in Education, 41(3), 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, E. J., & Bearse, C. I. (2014). Dual language programs as a strand within a secondary school: Dilemmas of school organization and the TWI mission. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17(1), 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, E. D., & Howard, E. (2009). Integration in two-way immersion education: Equalising linguistic benefits for all students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(1), 81–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, L. M. (2011). Contested communities in a debate over dual-language education: The import of “public” values on public policies. Educational Policy, 25(4), 577–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. (2000). Contextual challenges to dual-language education: A case study of a developing middle school program. Anthropology & education quarterly, 31(2), 202–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, P., & Rumberger, R. W. (2009). Immigration, language, and education : How does language policy structure opportunity? Teachers College Record, 111(3), 750–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gándara, P., Moran, R., & Garcia, E. (2004). Legacy of Brown: Lau and language policy in the United States. Review of Research in Education, 28, 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gort, M., de Jong, E., & Cobb, C. D. (2008). Seeing through a bilingual lens: Structural and ideological contexts of structured English immersion in three Massachusetts districts. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 8, 41–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., & Asato, J. (2000). “English for the children”: The new literacy of the old world order. Language Policy and Educational Reform, Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1–2), 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadi-Tabassum, S. (2006). Language, space and power: A critical look at bilingual education. Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.

  • Hopkins, M. (2014). Beliefs in context: Understanding language policy implementation at a systems level. Educational Policy, 1–33. doi:10.1177/0895904814550073.

  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532.

  • Howard, E. R., Sugarman, J., & Christian, D. (2003). Trends in two-way immersion education: A review of the research. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

  • Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, B. A., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2009). Education policy as a practice of power theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Educational Policy, 23(6), 767–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm-Leary, K., & Borsato, G. (2005). Hispanic high schoolers and mathematics: Follow-up of students who had participated in two-way bilingual elementary programs. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(3), 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindholm-Leary, K., & Hernández, A. (2011). Achievement and language proficiency of Latino students in dual language programmes: native English speakers, fluent English/previous ELLs, and current ELLs. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 32, 531–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malen, B. (2006). Revisiting policy implementation as a political phenomenon: The case of reconstitution policies. In M. I. Honig (Ed.), New Directions in Education Policy Implementation: Confronting Complexity (pp. 83–104). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  • Maxwell-Jolly, J. (2000). Factors influencing implementation of mandated policy change: Proposition 227 in seven northern California school districts. Bilingual Research Journal, 24(1–2), 37–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M., Huberman, M. A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. E., Destino, T., Karam, R. T., & Colón-Muñiz, A. (1999). The politics of bilingual education. Educational Policy, 13(1), 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paciotto, C., & Delany-Barmann, G. (2011). Planning micro-level language education reform in new diaspora sites: Two-way immersion education in the rural Midwest. Language Policy, 10(3), 221–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2007). A dual immersion strand programme in California: Carrying out the promise of dual language education in an English-dominant context. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(6), 752–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. K. (2008). Building and destroying students’ “academic identities”: The power of discourse in a two-way immersion classroom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 21, 647–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. K. (2009). Middle-class English speakers in a two-way immersion bilingual classroom: “Everybody should be to listening jonathan right now…”. Tesol Quarterly, 43(2), 177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. (2010). Race, power, and equity in a multiethnic urban elementary school with a dual-language “strand” program. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(1), 94–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, R. (1984). Orientations in language planning. NABE Journal, 8(2), 15–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, G. W., & Bernard, H. R. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Reiser, B. J., & Reimer, T. (2002). Policy Implementation and Cognition : Reframing and Refocusing Implementation Research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W. P., & Collier, V. P. (2002). A national study of school effectiveness for language minority students’ long-term academic achievement. Washington, DC: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umansky, I. M., & Reardon, S. F. (2014). Reclassification patterns among latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 879–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valdés, G. (1997). Dual-language immersion programs: A cautionary note concerning the education of language-minority students. Harvard Educational Review, 67, 391–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varghese, M. M., & Park, C. (2010). Going global: Can dual-language programs save bilingual education? Journal of Latinos and Education, 9(1), 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warhol, L., & Mayer, A. (2012). Misinterpreting school reform: The dissolution of a dual-immersion bilingual program in an Urban New England elementary school. Bilingual Research Journal, 35, 145–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiese, A. M. (2004). Bilingualism and biliteracy for all? Unpacking two-way immersion at second grade. Language and Education, 18(1), 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephanie Forman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forman, S. Interests and conflicts: exploring the context for early implementation of a dual language policy in one middle school. Lang Policy 15, 433–451 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9377-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9377-8

Keywords

Navigation