Skip to main content
Log in

Rejecting exclusion, embracing inclusion: conversation as policy-making at a US Baptist conference on sexuality and covenant

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While much of the work on language, policy, and religion has focused on how discourse is influenced by policy, this article presents a case study of how discourse is used to construct policy itself. These policy-making discourses tend to occur in institutional settings; however, non-institutional discourse may also be instrumental in the development and implementation of policy. The strict separation of institutional and non-institutional discourse is problematized as it fails to account for the ways in which both types of discourse are ideologically constructed and often co-occurring. The article analyzes how the non-institutional discourse model of ‘conversation’ was promoted in the institutional setting of The Baptist Conference on Sexuality and Covenant as a way to explicitly avoid policy-making. However, it is argued that the framing of a conversation did not ultimately circumvent the implications of policy-making but rather promoted a policy of inclusion over a policy of exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J. (1984). Love and conflict: A covenantal model of Christian ethics. Tennessee: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, B. (2011). CBF-sponsored sexuality conference taking shape. Associated Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.abpnews.com.

  • Allen, B. (2012). Baptist sexuality conference program released. Associated Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.abpnews.com.

  • Avni, S. (2012). Hebrew-only language policy in religious education. Language Policy, 11(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination (trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltzer, K. (1971). The covenant formulary in Old Testament, Jewish, and early Christian writings. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, R. (1994). Paul’s idea of community: The early house church in their cultural setting. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benrabah, M. (2007). Language-in-education planning in Algeria: Historical development and current issues. Language Policy, 6(2), 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birge, M. K. (2002). The language of belonging: A rhetorical analysis of kinship language in First Corinthians. Leuven: Peeters Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cade, R. (2010). Covenant marriage. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 18(3), 230–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (Ed.). (2005). Reclaiming local in language policy and practice. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, T. (2013). ‘Who am I to judge?’: The pope’s most powerful phrase in 2013. NBC News. Retrieved from http://worldnews.nbcnews.com.

  • Deutch, Y. (2005). Language law in Israel. Language Policy, 4(3), 261–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, J. (2010). Toward a dialogic syntax. Unpublished manuscript, Santa Barbara: Department of Linguistics, University of California.

  • Fannin, C. (2012). Baptists and sexuality: An Augustinian view. Christian Ethics Today, 20(4), 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaudio, R. (2003). Coffeetalk: Starbucks™ and the commercialization of casual conversation. Language in Society, 32, 659–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C., & Heritage, J. (1990). Conversation analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 283–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. (1990). The construction of homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, K., & Rubin, D. (1991). Effects of gender inclusive/exclusive language in religious discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10(2), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gushee, D. (2012, January 30). Opinion: Sex and covenant conference a rare opportunity. Associated Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.abpnews.com.

  • Gushee, D. (2012b). What are the ties that bind? Christian Ethics, 20(4), 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanhardt, C. (2013). Safe space: Gay neighborhood history and the politics of violence. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2001). The book of Jerry Falwell: Fundamentalist language and politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In K. Fitch & R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–147). Psychology Press.

  • Keane, W. (2004). Language and religion. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 431–448). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddicoat, A. (2012). Language planning as an element of religious practice. Current Issues in Language Planning, 13(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McElhinny, B. (1997). Ideologies of public and private in sociolinguistics. In R. Wodak (Ed.), Gender and discourse (pp. 106–139). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Omoniyi, T. (Ed.). (2011). The sociology of language and religion: Change, conflict and accommodation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omoniyi, T., & Fishman, J. (2006). Explorations in the sociology of language and religion. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, P. (1972). Christian marriage: Contract or covenant? Theological Studies, 33(4), 617–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels, A. (1998). Women changing language. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, B. (2011, May 31). CBF, Mercer collaborate to offer conference on sexuality in 2012. Associated Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.abpnews.com.

  • Phyak, P., & Bui, T. T. N. (2014). Youth engaging language policy and planning: Ideologies and transformations from within. Language Policy, 13(2), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, C. (2011, October 3). Baptists and sexuality: A time of ferment? Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com.

  • Sayles, G. (2012). What prevents one from being baptized? Christian Ethics Today, 20(4), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scroggs, R. (1986). The New Testament and homosexuality: Contextual background for contemporary debate. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shurden, W. (1993). The Baptist identity: Four fragile freedoms. Macon: Smyth and Helwys Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. (2012, February 29). Opinion: Baptist sexuality conference is misguided. Associated Baptist Press. Retrieved from http://www.abpnews.com.

  • Spolsky, B. (2009). Language management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • VanderStouwe, C. (forthcoming). Discourse and materiality: Regulating inclusive language to create safe spaces. Journal of Language and Sexuality.

  • Walsh, J. (2012). Language policy and language governance: a case-study of Irish language legislation. Language Policy, 11(4), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, J., & Niell, J. (2002). The same sex controversy: Defending and clarifying the Bible’s message about homosexuality. Grand Rapids: Baker Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Mary Bucholtz and Mireille Miller-Young for their feedback and suggestions in writing this article. Thanks also to the participants at the 2013 New Directions in Sexuality Studies graduate workshop at the University of California, Santa Barbara, as well as the anonymous reviewers and the editors at Language Policy for their guidance through the revision process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn Warner-Garcia.

Appendix: full conference program

Appendix: full conference program

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Warner-Garcia, S. Rejecting exclusion, embracing inclusion: conversation as policy-making at a US Baptist conference on sexuality and covenant. Lang Policy 15, 141–161 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9365-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9365-z

Keywords

Navigation