Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Ethnography of language policy

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Language Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While theoretical conceptualizations of language policy have grown increasingly rich, empirical data that test these models are less common. Further, there is little methodological guidance for those who wish to do research on language policy interpretation and appropriation. The ethnography of language policy is proposed as a method which makes macro–micro connections by comparing critical discourse analyses of language policy with ethnographic data collection in some local context. A methodological heuristic is offered to guide data collection and sample data are presented from the School District of Philadelphia. It is argued that critical conceptualizations of educational language policy should be combined with empirical data collection of policy appropriation in educational settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • August, D., & Shanahan, T. (Eds.) (2006). Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the national literacy panel on language-minority children and youth. Lawrence Erlbaum and Center for Applied Linguistics.

  • Ball, S. J. (1993). What is policy? Texts, trajectories and toolboxes. Discourse, 13(2), 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2006). Education policy and social class: The selected works of Stephen J. Ball. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltodano, M. P. (2004). Latino immigrant parents and the hegemony of Proposition 227. Latino Studies, 2, 246–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekerman, Z. (2005). Complex contexts and ideologies: Bilingual education in conflict-Ridden areas. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 4, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: Key topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canagarajah, S. (2006). Ethnographic methods in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), Language policy: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corson, D. (1999). Language policy in schools: A resource for teachers and administrators. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2002). Education chief: Keep bilingual option open. Retrieved from http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/JWCRAWFORD/DP9.htm.

  • Davis, K. A. (1999). Dynamics of indigenous language maintenance. In T. Huebner & K. A. Davis (Eds.), Sociopolitical perspectives on language policy and planning in the USA. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London and New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (1964). Language maintenance and language shift as fields of inquiry. Linguistics, 9, 32–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. S. (1979). Bilingual education, language planning and English. English World-Wide, 1(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, J. A. (1994). Critiques of language planning: A minority languages perspective. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 15, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume 1: An introduction. New Yok: Vintage Books.

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. D. (1998). Bilingual education and social change. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman-Field, R. D. (2004). Building on community bilingualism. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon Publishing.

  • Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1983). The implementation of corpus planning: Theory and practice. In J. Cobarrubias (Ed.), Progress in language planning.

  • Hornberger, N. H. (1988). Bilingual education and language maintenance. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornberger, N. H., & Johnson, D. C. (2007). Slicing the onion ethnographically: Layers and spaces in multilingual language education policy and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 509–532. Special Issue on Language Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. C. (2007). Language policy within and without the School District of Philadelphia. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.

  • Johnson, D. C. (2009a). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education Language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism.

  • Johnson, D. C. (2009b). The relationship between applied linguistic research and language policy for bilingual education. Applied Linguistics.

  • Johnson, D. C., & Freeman, R. (2009). Appropriating language policy on the local level: Working the spaces for multilingual education. In O. Garcia & K. Menken (Eds.), Negotiating language policies in classrooms: Teachers as change agents. Routledge.

  • King, K. (2001). Language revitalization processes and prospects: Quichua in the Ecuadorian Andes. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, B. A. U., & Sutton, M. (Eds.). (2001). Policy as practice: Toward a sociocultural analysis of educational policy. London: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, B. A. U., Sutton, M., & Winstead, T. (2007). Education policy as a practice of power: Ethnographic methods, democratic options. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Ethnography in Education Research Forum. Philadelphia, PA.

  • Palmer, D., & Lynch, A. (2008). A bilingual educaion for a monolingual test? The pressure to prepare for TAKS and its influence on choices for language of instruction in Texas elementary bilingual classrooms. Language Policy, 7(3), 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2002). Language Policy in Education: Critical Issues. In J. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policy and docile bodies: Hong Kong and Governmentality. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (2006). Postmodernism in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An Introduction to Language Policy: Theory and Method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan, V. (2005). Rethinking language planning and policy from the ground up: Refashioning institutional realities and human lives. Current Issues in Language Planning, 6(2), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (1998). Language and politics in the United States and Canada: Myths and realities. In T. Ricento & B. Burnaby (Eds.), National language policy in the United States. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T. (2000). Historical and theoretical perspectives in language policy and Planning. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(2), 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricento, T., & Hornberger, N. H. (1996). Unpeeling the onion: Language planning and policy and the ELT professional. TESOL Quarterly, 30(3), 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffman, H. S. (1996). Linguistic culture and language policy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, S. (2006). Undermining science: Suppression and distortion in the Bush administration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuy, R. (2001). Discourse analysis in the legal context. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2003). Legal discourse and decisions, teacher policymaking and the multilingual classroom: Constraining and supporting Khmer/English biliteracy in the united states. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 6(3&4), 168–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stritikus, T. (2002). Immigrant children and the politics of English-only. New York: LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stritikus, T., & Wiese, A. M. (2006). Reassessing the role of ethnographic methods in Education policy research: Implementing bilingual education policy at local Levels. Teachers College Record, 108, 1106–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (1991). Planning language, planning inequality: Language policy in the community. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (Ed.). (2002). Language policies in education: Critical issues. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollefson, J. W. (2006). Critical theory in language policy. In T. Ricento (Ed.), An introduction to language policy: Theory and method. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toppo, G. (2005, August 24). Is bilingual education report being downplayed? USA Today. Retrieved 25 March 2009, from http://www.usatoday.com/.

  • Wiese, A. M. (2001). To meet the needs of the kids, not the program: Teachers constructing policy, program, and practice in a bilingual school. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.

  • Wiley, T. G. (2002). Assessing language rights in education: A brief history of the US context. In J. W. Tollefson (Ed.), Language policies in education: Critical issues. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, T. G., & Wright, W. E. (2004). Against the undertow: Language-minority education Policy and politics in the “age of accountability”. Educational Policy, 18(2), 142–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (1996). Disorders of discourse. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. E. (2005). Evolution of federal policy and implications of No Child Left Behind for language minority students. Tempe, AZ: Language Policy Research Unit, Education Policy Studies Laboratory, Arizona State University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teaching and Learning, Washington State University, Cleveland 321, P.O. Box 642132, Pullman, WA, 99164-2132, USA

    David Cassels Johnson

Authors
  1. David Cassels Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Cassels Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, D.C. Ethnography of language policy. Lang Policy 8, 139–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-009-9136-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation