Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Context dependence and implicit arguments in existentials

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper discusses the semantics of bare existentials, i.e. existentials in which nothing follows the post copular NP (e.g. There are four sections). While it has sometimes been recognized that the interpretation of such sentences depends in some way on context, the exact nature of the context dependence involved has not been properly understood. It is shown that the meaning of bare existentials involves a set-denoting implicit argument, and that the range of interpretations found with bare existentials is predictable from the general properties of implicit arguments. An explicit analysis within a dynamic setting is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aloni, M. (2000). Quantification under conceptual covers. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

  • Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver D.I. (2001) Presupposition and assertion in dynamic semantics. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Borschev V., Partee B. (2001) The Russian genitive of negation in existentials sentences: The role of Theme-Rheme structure reconsidered. In: Hajičová E., Sgall P., Hana J., Hoskovec T. (eds) Travaux du cercle linguistique de Prague Vol. 4. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp 185–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Condoravdi C., Gawron J.M. (1996) The context-dependency of implicit arguments. In: Kanazawa M., Piñón C., deSwart H. (eds) Quantifiers, deduction and context. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, P. (1993). Transsentential meditations. Ups and downs in dynamic semantics. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.

  • Fillmore, C. (1986). Pragmatically controlled zero anaphora. In Proceedings of the twelfth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 95–107). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

  • Francez I. (2009) Existentials, predication, and modification. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(1): 1–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1982) The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim I. (1991) Artikel und definiteheit. In: Stechow A., Wunderlich D. (eds) Hanbuch der semantik. de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan D. (1989) Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein H. (eds) Themes from Kaplan. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 481–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E. (1987) A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In: Reuland E., ter Meulen A. (eds) The representation of (in)definiteness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 286–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan E. (2003) The definiteness effect: Semantics or pragmatics?. Natural Language Semantics 11(2): 187–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally L. (1992) An interpretation for the English existential construction. Garland, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally L. (1998) Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 21(4): 353–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muskens R. (1996) Combining montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 143–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. (1989). Binding implicit arguments in quantified contexts. In CLS 25 (pp. 342–365).

  • Partee, B. H. (2004 [1999]). Weak NP’s in HAVE sentences. In Compositionality in formal semantics: Selected Papers of Barbara Partee. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Partee, B. H., & Vladimir, B. (2002). Genitive of negation and scope of negation in Russian existential sentences. In Formal approaches to Slavic linguistics 10.

  • Partee, B. H., & Vladimir, B. (2004). The semantics of Russian genitive of negation: The nature and role of perspectival structure. In R. B. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XIV (pp. 212–234). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Partee, B. H., & Vladimir, B. (2006). Information structure, perspectival structure, diathesis alternation, and the russian genitive of negation. In Proceedings of the ninth symposium on logic and language, Besenyőtelek, Hungary.

  • von Fintel K. (1995) A minimal theory of adverbial quantification. In: Partee B., Kamp H. (eds) Context dependence in the analysis of linguistic meaning: Proceedings of the workshops in Prague, February 1995, Bad Teinach, May 1995. IMS, Stuttgart, pp 153–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi A. (1995) The ingredients of definiteness and the definiteness effect. Natural Language Semantics 3(1): 33–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Itamar Francez

Authors
  1. Itamar Francez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Itamar Francez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francez, I. Context dependence and implicit arguments in existentials. Linguist and Philos 33, 11–30 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9073-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9073-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation