The gifted mathematician that you claim to be: Equational intensional ‘reconstruction’ relatives
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper investigates relative constructions as in The gifted mathematician that you claim to be should be able to solve this equation, in which the head noun (gifted mathematician) is semantically dependent on an intensional operator in the relative clause (claim), even though it is not c-commanded by it. This is the kind of situation that has led, within models of linguistic description that assume a syntactic level of Logical Form, to analyses in which the head noun is interpreted within the CP-internal gap by reconstruction or interpretation of a lower element of a chain. We offer a solution that views surface representation as the input to semantics. The apparent inverted scope effects are traced back to the interpretation of the head nominal gifted mathematician as applying to individual concepts, and of the relative clause that you claim to be as including an equational statement. According to this view, the complex DP in question refers to the individual concept that exists just in the worlds that are compatible with what is generally supposed to be the case, is a gifted mathematician in those worlds, and is identical to you in those worlds. Our solution is related to the nonreconstructionist analysis of binding of pronouns that do not stand in a c-command relationship to their binder, as in The woman that every man hugged was his mother in Jacobson (in: Harvey, Santelmann (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV:161–178, 1994) and Sharvit (in: Galloway, Spence (eds.) Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VI:227–244, 1996), and allows us to capture both similarities with and differences from the latter type of construction. We point out and offer explanations for a number of properties of such relative clauses—in particular their need for an internal intensional operator, their incompatibility with any determiner other than the definite article, and the fact that some of their properties are shared by demonstrably distinct kinds of relative clauses.
- Bhatt R. (2002). The raising analysis of relative clauses: Evidence from adjectival modification. Natural Language Semantics 10: 43–90 CrossRef
- Carlson G. (1977). Amount relatives. Language, 53: 540–542 CrossRef
- Chierchia G. (1993). Questions with quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 1: 181–234 CrossRef
- Chomsky N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In: Hale K., Keyser S. (eds) The view from Building 20 Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. Cambridge MA, MIT Press, pp. 1–52
- Dayal V. (1995). Quantification in correlatives. In: Bach E. (eds) Quantification in natural language. Dordrecht, Kluwer, pp. 179–206
- de Swart, H. (1991). Adverbs of quantification: A generalized quantifier approach. University of Groningen. Also published by Garland, New York, 1993.
- Doron, E. (1983). Verbless predicates in Hebrew. PhD dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
- Doron E. (1986). The pronominal ‘copula’ as agreement clitic. In: Borer H. (eds) The syntax of pronominal clitics, syntax and semantics 19. New York, Academic Press, pp. 313–332
- Engdahl E. (1986). Constituent questions. The syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to Swedish. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company
- Groenendijk J., Stokhof M. (1983). Interrogative quantifiers and Skolem functions. In: Ehlich K., van Riemsdijk H. (eds) Connectedness in sentence, discourse and text. Tilburg, Tilburg University Press
- Grosu A. (1994). Three studies in locality and case. Routledge, London
- Grosu A. (2000). Type resolution in relative constructions. Competing restrictive and maximalizing constructions. In: Bennis Everaert, Reuland (eds) Interface strategies. Royal Netherlands, Academy of Arts and Sciences
- Grosu A. (2002). Strange relatives at the interface of two millenia. GLOT International 6: 145–167
- Grosu A. (2003). A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247–331 CrossRef
- Grosu A. (2007). Direct vs. indirect approaches to transparent free relatives. In: Alboiu G. (eds) Pitar Mos: A building with a view. Papers in honour of Alexandra Comilescu. Bucharest, University of Bucharest Press
- Grosu, A., & Krifka, M. (2004). The brilliant mathematician you claim to be. The semantics of modal compatibility relative clauses. Paper Presented at Sinn and Bedeutung 9, Nijmegen.
- Grosu A., Landman F. (1998). Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–170 CrossRef
- Gupta A. (1980). The logic of common nouns: An investigation in quantified modal logic. New Haven, Yale University Press
- Huddleston R.D., Pullum G. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
- Hulsey S., Sauerland U. (2006). Sorting out relative clauses. Natural Language Semantics 14: 111–137 CrossRef
- Jacobson, P. (1994). Binding connectivity in copular sentences. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV, 161–178.
- Jacobson, P. (2002a). Direct compositionality and variable-free semantics: The case of binding into heads. In B. Jackson (Ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VII.
- Jacobson P. (2002b). The (dis)organization of the grammar: 25 years. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 601–626 CrossRef
- Kirwan,J. (2006). Something is terribly wrong with this country! URL http://www.rense.com/general72/wrng.htm. Retrieved: 15 Aug 2007.
- Krifka M. (1990). Four thousand ships passed through the lock: Object-induced measure functions on events. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 487–520 CrossRef
- Lasersohn P. (2005). The temperature paradox as evidence for a presuppositional analysis of definite descriptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 128–134 CrossRef
- Link G. (1979). Montague-Grammatik. Die logischen Grundlagen. Fink, München
- Link G. (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice-theoretical approach. In: Bäuerle R., Schwarze C., von Stechow A. (eds) Meaning, use and the interpretation of language. Berlin New York, Walter de Gruyter, pp. 303–323
- Löbner S. (1979). Intensionale Verben und Funktionalbegriffe. Tübingen, Narr
- McNally, L., & Van Geenhoven, V. (2005). On the property analysis of opaque complements. Lingua, 885–914.
- Montague R. (1973). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In: Hintikka K.J.J., Moravcsik J.M.E., Suppes P. (eds) Approaches to natural language. Dordrecht, Reidel, pp. 221–242
- Partee B. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In: Groenendijk J. (eds) Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers. Dordrecht, Foris, pp. 115–143
- Paprocki,M. (2004). Plumbers don’t wear ties. URL http://www.digitpress.com/reviews/plumbersdontwearties.htm. Retrieved: 15 Aug 2007.
- Potts C. (2005). The logic of conventional implicature. Oxford, Oxford University Press
- Rothstein S. (2001). Predicates and their Subjects. Dordrecht, Kluwer
- Saunders J.R. (1997). Tightrope walk: Identity, survival and the corporate world in African American literature. Jefferson, NC, McFarland & Co
- Sharvit, Y. (1996). Functional dependencies and indirect binding. In T. Galloway & J. Spence (Eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VI, 227–244.
- Sharvit Y. (1999). Functional relative clauses. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 447–478 CrossRef
- Sharvy R. (1980). A more general theory of definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 75: 607–624 CrossRef
- van Geenhoven V. (1998). Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions. Semantic and syntactic aspects of noun incorporation in West Greenlandic. CSLI Publications, Stanford
- von Stechow, A. (1990). Layered traces. Unpublished Presentation at Conference on Logic and Language, Revfülöp, Hungary.
- The gifted mathematician that you claim to be: Equational intensional ‘reconstruction’ relatives
Linguistics and Philosophy
Volume 30, Issue 4 , pp 445-485
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Relative clauses
- Head-raising analysis of relative clauses
- Syntax/Semantics interface
- Individual concepts