Abstract
Context
The assessment of land-use impacts on biodiversity is one of the central themes of landscape ecology and conservation biology. However, due to the complexity of biodiversity, it is impossible to obtain complete information about the diversity of all species even for small areas, necessitating the selection of individual species or assemblages thereof as species surrogate. In parts of the world where taxonomic expertise is lacking, species identification has hindered progress in biodiversity conservation, and the only practical, relatively-accurate option, is the use of taxonomic minimalism.
Objective
We carried out a rapid biodiversity assessment based on three surrogates—land-use (driver-surrogate), terrestrial arthropods (species-surrogate) and morphospecies (taxonomic-surrogate)—to determine the impacts of land-use on biodiversity of the Western Region (Ghana), an area covering ~4 % of the West African biodiversity hotspot.
Method
We used diversity profiles to visualize the distribution of a total of 8848 arthropod individuals over seven land-use types which define the complete heterogeneity of the landscape.
Results
Here, we present both sample and asymptotic diversity profiles of arthropod morphospecies for each land-use type and the potential of each land-use type for conserving arthropods.
Conclusions
We conclude that (1) the morphospecies approach is useful for detecting differences in species diversity of land-use types; (2) the concept of asymptotic diversity may not be necessary for land-use based biodiversity comparison; and (3) maximum diversity profiles are useful for determining the land-use conservation values in cases where pristine areas are not available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alkemade R, van Oorschot M, Miles L, Nellemann C, Bakkenes M, ten Brink B (2009) GLOBIO3: a framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 12:374–390
Anyomi KA, Pelz DR, Kyereh B, Anglaaere LCN (2011) Influence of age and cropping system on tree population structure in South West Ghana. Afr J Agric Res 6(4):873–881
Aquino J, Catala M, Carmona-Galindo VD (2013) Anthropogenic impacts of irrigation on the arthropod community structure of a coastal sage scrub habitat in Los Angeles. Bios 84(2):101–105
Baldock CKR, Goddard MA, Hicks DM, Kunin WE, Mitschunas N, Osgathorpe LM, Pott SG, Robertson KM, Scott AV, Stone GN, Vaughan IP, Memmott J (2015) Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:20142849
Basset Y, Missa O, Alonso A, Miller SE, Curletti G, De Meyer M, Eardley CD, Mansell MW, Novotny V, Wagner T (2008) Faunal turnover of arthropod assemblages along a wide gradient of disturbance in Gabon. Afr Entomol 16(1):47–59
Bennett AB, Gratton C (2013) Floral diversity increases beneficial arthropod richness and decreases variability in arthropod community composition. Ecol Appl 23(1):86–95
Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh BN, Lebel L (2015) Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability 14:76–85
Bertone MA, Leong M, Bayless KM, Malow TLF, Dunn RR, Trautwein MD (2016) Arthropods of the great indoors: characterizing diversity inside urban and suburban homes. PeerJ 4:e1582
Brown AK, Gurevitch J (2004) Long-term impact of logging on forest diversity in Madagascar. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(16):6045–6049
Buchholz S, Schirmel J, Siewers J (2014) The efficiency of pitfall traps as a method of sampling epigeal arthropods in litter rich forest habitats. Eur J Entomol 111(1):69–74
Bull JW, Milner-Gulland EJ, Suttle KB, Singh NJ (2014) Comparing biodiversity offset calculation methods with a case study in Uzbekistan. Biol Conserv 178:2–10
Caro T (2010) Conservation by proxy: indicator, umbrella, keystone and other surrogate species. Island Press, Washington, DC
Chao A, Jost L (2012) Coverage-based rarefaction and extrapolation: standardizing samples by completeness rather than size. Ecology 93(12):2533–2547
Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Hsieh TC, Sander EL, Ma KH, Colwell RK, Ellison AM (2014) Rarefaction and extrapolation with Hill numbers: a framework for sampling and estimation in species diversity studies. Ecol Monogr 84(1):45–67
Chen Y, Randerson JT, Van de Werf GR, Morton DC, Mu M, Kasibhatla PS (2010) Nitrogen deposition in tropical forests from savanna and deforestation fires. Glob Change Biol 16:2024–2038
Cotes B, Ruano F, García PA, Pascual F, Campos M (2009) Coccinellid morphospecies as an alternative method for differentiating management regimes in olive orchards. Ecol Indic 9:548–555
Cranston PS (1990) Biomonitoring and invertebrate taxonomy. Environ Monit Assess 14:265–273
Dagobert KK, Klimaszewski J, Mamadou D, Daouda A, Mamadou D (2008) Comparing beetle abundance and diversity values along a land use gradient in tropical Africa (Oumé, Ivory Coast). Zool Stud 47(4):429–437
De Baan L, Curran M, Rondinini C, Visconti P, Hellweg S, Koellner T (2015) High-resolution assessment of land-use impacts on biodiversity in life cycle assessment using species habitat suitability models. Environ Sci Technol 49:2237–2244
Deguines N, Julliard R, de Flores M, Fontaine C (2012) The whereabouts of flower visitors: contrasting land-use preferences revealed by a country-wide survey based on citizen science. PLoS One 7(9):1–9
Derraik JGB, Closs GP, Dickinson KJM, Sirvid P, Barratt BIP, Patrick BH (2002) Arthropod morphospecies verses taxonomic species: a case study with Araneae, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Conserv Biol 16(4):1015–1023
Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, Bartuska A (2015) The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:1–16
Dickson KB (1969) A historical geography of Ghana. Cambridge University Press, London
Duelli P (1997) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscapes: an approach at two different scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 62(2–3):81–91
Duelli P, Chumak V, Obrist MK, Virz P (2005) Biodiversity values of European virgin forests. For Snow Landsc Res 79(1):91–99
Emmel TC, Larsen TB (1997) Butterfly diversity in Ghana. West Africa. Trop Lepidoptera 8(suppl. 3):1–13
Ferrarini A (2012) Betterments to biodiversity optimal sampling. Proc Int Acad Ecol Environ Sci 2(4):246–250
Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, Helkowski JH (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–573
Forman RTT (1995) Land mosaics: the ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Geohring DM, Daily GC, Sekercioglu CH (2002) Distribution of ground-dwelling arthropod in tropical countryside habitats. J Insect Conserv 6:83–91
Ghana Statistical Service (2013) 2010 Population and housing census: national analytical report. Ghana Statistical Service, Ghana
Goldstein PZ (1997) How many things are there? A reply to Oliver and Beattie, Beattie and Oliver, Oliver and Beattie, and Oliver and Beattie. Conserv Biol 11(2):571–574
Hackman KO (2014) The state of biodiversity in Ghana, knowledge gaps and prioritization. Int J Biodivers Conserv 6(9):681–701
Hackman KO (2015) A method for assessing land-use impacts on biodiversity in a landscape. Glob Conserv Ecol 3:83–89
Hill M (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54(2):427–432
Hurlbert SH (1971) The Nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52(4):577–586
Jost L (2006) Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113(2):363–375
Jost L, DeVries P, Walla T, Greeney H, Chao A, Ricotta C (2010) Partitioning diversity for conservation analyses. Divers Distrib 16:65–76
Krell F-T (2004) Parataxonomy vs. taxonomy in biodiversity studies—pitfalls and applicability of ‘morphospecies’ sorting. Biodivers Conserv 13(4):795–812
Laurance WF (2004) Rapid land-use change and its impacts on tropical biodiversity. Geophysical monograph series, vol 153
Leinster T, Cobbold CA (2012) Measuring diversity: an importance of species similarity. Ecology 93(3):477–489
Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, Oxford
McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176
Milne RJ, Bennett LP (2007) Biodiversity and ecological value of conservation lands in agricultural landscapes of southern Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecol 22:657–670
Ministry of food and agriculture (2011) Agriculture in Ghana: facts and figures 2010. Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Accra
Moore BA (2005) Alien invasive species: impacts on forests and forestry—a review. Forest resources development service working paper FBS/8E. Forest Resources Division FAO, Rome
Nadkarni NM, Longino JT (1990) Invertebrates in canopy and ground organic matter in a neotropical montane forest, Costa Rica. Biotropica 22(3):286–289
Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, Day J (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–69
Niemelä J, Kotze J, Ashworth A, Brandmayr P, Desender K, New T, Penev L, Samways M, Spence J (2000) The search for common anthropogenic impacts on biodiversity: a global network. J Insect Conserv 4:3–9
Nyame SK, Okai M, Adeleke A, Fisher B (2012) Small changes for big impacts: lessons for landscapes and livelihoods from the Wassa Amenfi West Landscape, Ghana. IUCN, Gland
Obrist MK, Duelli P (2010) Rapid biodiversity assessment of arthropods for monitoring average local species richness and related ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv 19(8):2201–2220
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1993) A possible method for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 7(3):562–568
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1995) Reply from A.J. Beattie and I. Oliver. Trends Ecol Evol 10(5):203–204
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996a) Invertebrate morphospecies as surrogates for species: a case study. Conserv Biol 10(1):99–109
Oliver I, Beattie AJ (1996b) Designing a cost-effective invertebrate survey: a test of methods for rapid assessment of biodiversity. Ecol Appl 6(2):594–607
Oliver TH, Morecroft MD (2014) Interactions between climate change and land use change on biodiversity: attribution problems, risks, and opportunities. WIREs Clim Change 5:317–335
Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, Wisdom JP, Duan N, Hoagwood K (2015) Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health Ment Health Serv Res 42(5):533–544
Rödel M-O, Gil M, Agyei AC, Leaché AD, Diaz RE, Fujita MK, Ernst R (2005) The amphibians of the forested parts of south-western Ghana. Salamandra, Rheinbach 41(3):107–127
Rodrigues ASL, Brooks TM (2007) Shortcuts for biodiversity conservation planning: the effectiveness of surrogates. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:713–737
Skidmore AK, Pettorelli N, Coops NC, Geller GN, Hansen M, Lucas R, Mücher CA, O’Connor B, Paganini M, Pereira HM, Schaepman ME, Turner W, Wang T, Wegmann M (2015) Environmental science: agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space. Nature 523(7561):403–405
Stamps WT, Linit MJ (1998) Plant diversity and arthropod communities: implications for temperate agroforestry. Agrofor Syst 39:79–88
Timms LL, Bowden JJ, Summerville KS, Buddle CM (2013) Does species-level resolution matter? Taxonomic sufficiency in terrestrial arthropod biodiversity studies. Insect Conserv Divers 6:453–462
Tóthmérész B (1995) Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J Veg Sci 6(2):283–290
Tuomisto H (2012) An updated consumer’s guide to evenness and related indices. Oikos 121:1203–1218
Vitcu A, Lungu E, Vitcu L, Marcu A (2007) Multi-stage maximum variation sampling in health promotion programs’ evaluation. J Prev Med 15:5–18
Ward DF, New TR, Yen AL (2001) Effects of pitfall trap spacing on the abundance, richness and composition of invertebrate catches. J Insect Conserv 5:47–53
Wardhuagh CW (2014) The spatial and temporal distributions of arthropods in forest canopies: uniting disparate patterns with hypotheses for specialisation. Biol Rev 89(4):1021–1041
Wu J (2013) Key concepts and research topics in landscape ecology revisited: 30 years after the Allerton Park workshop. Landscape Ecol 28:1–11
Zettler JA, Taylor MD, Allen CR, Spira TP (2004) Consequences of forest clear-cuts for native and nonindigenous ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 97(3):513–518
Acknowledgments
Primary support for Kwame Oppong Hackman came from a research Grant from Tsinghua University research (Grant Number 2012Z02287). The authors wish to acknowledge the support of Messrs John Nuapa Aidoo and Isaac Darko who offered great support during the collection and classification of data. We also thank the Ghana Forestry Commission (GFC) for granting access to the Subri River and Krokosua forest reserves and also to the GFC staff at Daboase and Juaboso for their support in identifying and setting up experiments in suitable areas of the reserves. We would like to thank two anonymous reviewers whose constructive comments and suggestions helped us to improve the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Appendix A1
Description of collection sites. Detailed description of sites of collection (DOCX 7318 kb)
Appendix A2
Proof of Equation 2. A short proof of equation 2 (DOCX 12 kb)
Appendix A3
Matlab codes. M-files (Matlab scripts) for computing the diversities and plotting the diversity profiles (TXT 7 kb)
Appendix A4
Diversity profile plots. Plots of non-asymptotic and asymptotic diversity profiles for each type of land-use (ZIP 965 kb)
Appendix A5
Ecological data. Arthropod morphospecies data for each land-use type and for each trap type (including pooled data) (ZIP 61 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hackman, K.O., Gong, P. & Venevsky, S. A rapid assessment of landscape biodiversity using diversity profiles of arthropod morphospecies. Landscape Ecol 32, 209–223 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0440-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0440-4