Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Movement behaviour of a forest songbird in an urbanized landscape: the relative importance of patch-level effects and body condition during migratory stopover

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With expansion of urban areas worldwide, migrating songbirds increasingly encounter fragmented landscapes where habitat patches are embedded in an urban matrix, yet how migrating birds respond to urbanization is poorly understood. Our research evaluated the relative importance of patch-level effects and body condition to movement behaviour of songbirds during migratory stopover within an urban landscape. We experimentally relocated 91 migrant Swainson’s thrushes (Catharus ustulatus) fitted with 0.66 g radio-transmitters to seven forest patches that differed in area (0.7–38.4 ha) and degree of urbanization within central Ohio, USA, May 2004–2007. Fine-scale movement rate of thrushes (n = 55) did not differ among urban forest sites, but birds in low energetic condition moved at higher rates, indicating an energetically mediated influence on movement behaviour. In larger sites, Swainson’s thrushes (n = 59) had greater coarse-level movement during the first 3 days and utilized areas farther from forest edge, indicating stronger influence by patch-level factors. Thrushes exhibited strong site tenacity, with only five individuals (7%) leaving release patches prior to migratory departure. Movement outside the release patch only occurred at the smallest forest patches (0.7 and 4.5 ha), suggesting that these sites were too small to meet needs of some individuals. Swainson’s thrushes exhibited edge avoidance and apparent area sensitivity within urban forest patches during stopover, implying that conservation of larger patches within urban and other fragmented landscapes may benefit this species and other migrant forest birds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aborn DA, Moore FR (1997) Pattern of movement by summer tanagers (Piranga rubra) during migratory stopover: a telemetry study. Behaviour 134:1077–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachler E, Schaub M (2007) The effects of permanent local emigration and encounter technique on stopover duration estimates as revealed by telemetry and mark-recapture. Condor 109:142–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B 57:289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin MS, Cochran WW, Wikelski MC (2005) Biotelemetry of new world thrushes during migration: physiology, energetics, and orientation in the wild. Integr Comp Biol 45:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernetsov N (2006) Habitat selection by nocturnal passerine migrants en route: mechanisms and results. J Ornithol 147:185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernetsov N, Mukhin A (2006) Spatial behavior of European robins during migratory stopovers: a telemetry study. Wilson J Ornithol 118:364–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WW (1987) Orientation and other migratory behaviors of a Swainson’s thrush followed for 1500-km. Anim Behav 35:927–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WW, Wikelski MC (2005) Individual migratory tactics of New World Catharus thrushes: current knowledge and future tracking options from space. In: Marra P, Greenberg R (eds) Birds of two worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 274–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran WW, Graber RR, Montgomery GG (1967) Migratory flights of Hylocichla thrushes in spring: a radio telemetry study. Living Bird 6:213–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ (2001) Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedenström A (2008) Adaptations to migration in birds: behavioural strategies, morphology and scaling effects. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 363:287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedenström A, Alerstam T (1997) Optimal fuel loads in migratory birds: distinguishing between time and energy minimization. J Theor Biol 189:227–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helms CW, Drury WH (1960) Winter and migratory weight and fat field study on some North American buntings. Bird Band 31:1–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooge PN, Eichenlaub B (1997) ANIMAL MOVEMENT extension to ArcView, version 1.1. United States Geological Survey, Anchorage

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL (1985) Seasonal changes in the habitat distribution of transient insectivorous birds in southeastern Arizona: competition mediated? Auk 102:120–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenni L, Schaub M (2003) Behavioural and physiological reactions to environmental variation in bird migration: a review. In: Berthold P, Gwinner E, Sonnenschein E (eds) Avian migration. Springer-Verlag, Germany, pp 155–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenward RE (2001) A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack DE, Yong W (2000) Swainson’s Thrush (Catharus ustulatus), No. 540. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America. The Birds of North America, Inc, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Withey JC, Whittaker KA et al (2007) Consequences of habitat utilization by nest predators and breeding songbirds across multiple scales in an urbanizing landscape. Condor 109:516–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews SN (2008) Stopover habitat utilization by migratory landbirds within urbanizing landscapes of central Ohio. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

  • McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millspaugh JJ, Marzluff JM (2001) Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore FR, Aborn DA (2000) Mechanisms of en route habitat selection: how do migrants make habitat decisions during stopover? Stud Avian Biol 20:34–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore FR, Kerlinger P, Simons T (1990) Stopover on a gulf coast barrier island by spring trans-gulf migrants. Wilson Bull 102:487–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore FR, Gauthreaux SA, Kerlinger P, Simons TR (1995) Habitat requirements during migration: important link in conservation. In: Martin T, Finch D (eds) Ecology and management of neotropical migratory birds. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 121–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennington D, Hansel J, Blair RB (2008) The conservation value of urban riparian areas for landbirds during spring migration: land cover, scale, and vegetation effects. Biol Conserv 141:1235–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petit DR (2000) Habitat use by landbirds along Nearctic–Neotropical migration routes: implications for conservation of stopover habitats. Stud Avian Biol 20:15–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald PG, Brittingham MC (2004) Stopover habitats of landbirds during fall: use of edge-dominated and early successional forests. Auk 121:1040–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald PG, Brittingham MC (2007) Stopover habitat use by spring migrant landbirds: the roles of habitat structure, leaf development, and food availability. Auk 124:1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald PG, Matthews SN (2005) Landbird use of riparian and upland forest stopover habitats in an urban landscape. Condor 107:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Shustack DP (2008) Urban flight: understanding individual and population-level responses of Nearctic–Neotropical migratory birds to urbanization. J Anim Ecol 77:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hostedde AI, Zinner B, Millar JS et al (2005) Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology 86:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seewagen CL, Slayton EJ (2008) Mass changes of migratory landbirds during stopovers in a New York City park. Wilson J Ornithol 120:296–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sillett TS, Holmes RT (2002) Variation in survivorship of a migratory songbird throughout its annual cycle. J Anim Ecol 71:296–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons TR, Pearson SM, Moore FR (2000) Application of spatial models to the stopover ecology of trans-gulf migrants. Stud Avian Biol 20:4–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorace A (2002) High density of bird and pest species in urban habitats and the role of predator abundance. Ornis Fennica 79:60–71

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org. Last accessed 14 Sept 2009

  • Tietz JR, Johnson MD (2007) Stopover ecology and habitat selection of juvenile Swainson’s thrushes during fall migration along the northern California coast. Condor 109:795–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White J, Faaborg J (2008) Post-fledging movement and spatial habitat-use patterns of juvenile Swainson’s Thrushes. Wilson J Ornithol 120:62–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedner DS, Kerlinger P, Sibley DA et al (1992) Visible morning flight of Neotropical landbird migrants at Cape May, New Jersey. Auk 109:500–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikelski M, Tarlow EM, Raim A et al (2003) Costs of migration in free-flying songbirds. Nature 423:704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ydenberg R, Butler R, Lank D et al (2004) Western sandpipers have altered migration tactics as peregrine falcon populations have recovered. Proc R Soc B 271:1263–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to those who collected the data for this project; M. Labbe, S. Beaudreault, J. Fear, E. Dorsay, J. Cummings, J. Sauter, C. Stanton, J. Sullivan, and K. Kaminski. Comments from A. D. Rodewald and L. R. Iverson, and two anonymous reviews greatly improved the manuscript. We thank Columbus Recreation and Parks and E. Grody for permission to conduct research at Lazelle Woods, Woodward, and Rush Run parks. Columbus Metro Parks and J. O’Meara kindly gave permission to conduct research at Highbanks Metro Park. Funding was provided by the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Program (W-134-P, Wildlife Management in Ohio), and administered jointly by the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the Ohio Division of Wildlife. Animal handling methods were approved by the Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC Permit # 2009A0034).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen N. Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, S.N., Rodewald, P.G. Movement behaviour of a forest songbird in an urbanized landscape: the relative importance of patch-level effects and body condition during migratory stopover. Landscape Ecol 25, 955–965 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9475-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-010-9475-0

Keywords

Navigation