Abstract
This research was a cross-validation study of the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument-Revised (DVSI-R), using a diverse, statewide sample of 3,569 family violence perpetrators in Connecticut, assessed in February and March of 2007. It analyzed re-arrest data collected during an 18-month period post assessment. Three issues were central, which have been ignored in previous research on family violence risk assessment: (1) analyzing five refined measures of behavioral recidivism, (2) determining whether perpetrator characteristics and types of family and household relationships (beyond just heterosexual intimate partners) moderate the empirical relations between the DVSI-R and the behavioral recidivism measures, and (3) determining whether structured clinical judgment about the imminent risk of future violence to the victim or to others corresponds with recidivism predicted by the DVSI-R total numeric risk scores. The empirical findings showed that the DVSI-R had significant predictive accuracy across all five measures of recidivism. With one exception, these relations did not vary by gender, age, or ethnicity; and again with one exception, no significant evidence was found that types of family or household relationships moderated those empirical relations. In short, the evidence suggested that the DVSI-R was a robust risk assessment instrument, having applicability across different types of perpetrators and different types of family and household relationships. Finally, the empirical findings showed that structured clinical judgment about imminent risk-to-victim and risk-to-others corresponded with the prediction of recidivism by the DVSI-R total numeric risk scores, but the effects of those scores were significantly stronger than the perceived risk-to-victim or the perceived risk-to-others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct. Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2004). The Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Brennen, T., Dieterick, W., & Ehret, B. (2009). Evaluating the predictive validity of the Compas risk and needs assessment system. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 21–40. doi:10.1177/0093854808326545.
Campbell, J. C. (2007). Prediction of homicide of and by battered women. In J. C. Campbell (Ed.), Assessing dangerousness (2nd ed., pp. 85–104). New York: Springer.
Cleves, M. A. (2002). From the help desk: Comparing areas under receiver operating characteristic curves from two or more probit or logit models. The Stata Journal, 2, 301–313. Retrieved from http://www.statajournal.com/article.html?article=st0023.
Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Dutton, D. G., & Kropp, P. R. (2000). A review of domestic violence risk instruments. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1, 171–181. doi:10.1177/1524838000001002004.
Goodman, L. A., Dutton, M. A., & Bennett, L. (2000). Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 63–74. doi:10.1177/088626000015001005.
Hare, R. D. (1991). Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). New York: Multi-Health Systems.
Heckert, D. A., & Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 778–800. doi:10.1177/0886260504265619.
Hilton, N. Z., Carter, A. M., Harris, G. T., & Sharpe, A. J. (2008). Does using non-numerical terms to describe risk aid violence risk communication? Clinician preference, agreement, and decision-making. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 171–188. doi:10.1177/0886260507309337.
Hilton, N. Z., & Harris, G. T. (2005). Predicting recidivism among serious wife assaulters: A critical review and implications for policy and practice. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 3–23. doi:10.1177/1524838004272463.
Hilton, N. Z., & Harris, G. T. (2009). How nonrecidivism affects predictive accuracy: Evidence from a cross-validation of the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment (ODARA). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 326–337. doi:10.1177/0886260508316478.
Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. R. (2010). Risk assessment for domestically violent men: Tools for criminal justice, offender intervention, and victim services. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/12066-000.
Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavina, A., Faggiani, D., & Reuland, M. (2007). Explaining the prevalence, context, and consequences of dual arrests in intimate partner cases. Final report to the U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
Kropp, P. R., & Hart, S. D. (2000). The Spouse Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA): Reliability and validity in adult male offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 101–118. doi:10.1023/A:1005430904495.
National Research Council. (2004). Advancing the federal research agenda on violence against women. Washington, DC: The National Academic Press.
Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, M. A. (2006). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11367-000.
Simpson, S. S., Bouffard, L. A., Garner, J., & Hickman, L. (2006). The influence of legal reform on the probability of arrest in domestic violence cases. Justice Quarterly, 23, 297–316. doi:10.1080/07418820600869087.
Williams, K. R. (2008). Domestic Violence Screening Instrument (DVSI). In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology and law (pp. 240–242). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Williams, K. R., & Grant, S. R. (2006). Empirically examining the risk of intimate partner violence: The revised Domestic Violence Screening Instrument (DVSI-R). Public Health Reports, 121, 400–408. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20056981.
Williams, K. R., & Houghton, A. (2004). Assessing the risk of domestic violence re-offending: A validation study. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 437–455. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000039334.59297.f0.
Williams, K. R., Tuthill, L., & Lio, S. (2008). A portrait of juvenile offending in the United States. In R. D. Hoge, N. G. Guerra, & P. Boxer (Eds.), Treating the juvenile offender (pp. 15–32). New York: The Guilford Press.
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted with assistance from the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division (CSSD) of the State of Connecticut. Special appreciation is expressed to William Carbone, Executive Director of CSSD. Appreciation is also expressed (in alphabetical order) to Kathy Ceruti, Joe DiTunno, Steve Grant, Brian Hill, Deb Kulak, and Brian Sperry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Williams, K.R. Family Violence Risk Assessment: A Predictive Cross-Validation Study of the Domestic Violence Screening Instrument-Revised (DVSI-R). Law Hum Behav (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-011-9272-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-011-9272-6