Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a sparging chamber for field radon analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Radon-222 has become a widely used tracer of submarine groundwater discharge. However, remote field studies are often limited by the need to pump water to a spray chamber which degasses dissolved radon for subsequent analysis in the gaseous phase. We develop here a new method of degassing dissolved 222Rn, utilizing a stream of bubbles driven by the internal air pump of a commercial radon analyzer to achieve air:water partitioning equilibrium, eliminating the need to pump water. This system utilizes a sparging chamber, comprised of a slotted vertically-oriented pipe with bubbles produced in the bottom. A non-slotted section of the pipe at the top of the chamber forms a sealed headspace, allowing air to be circulated in a closed loop between the sparging chamber and a radon-in-air monitor. We found that such a sparging chamber needs to allow bubbles to rise through at least 45 cm of water column to function at equal efficiency as the standard protocol of the spray chamber. Under our optimized configuration, the sparging chamber operates as efficiently as the standard protocol at measuring dissolved 222Rn activities when encountering increasing 222Rn activities, and offers even greater gas exchange efficiency when dissolved 222Rn activities decrease. The sparging chamber offers a more field-friendly alternative to measuring 222Rn activities, as it eliminates the need to maintain a submersible pump throughout the measurement and it offers increased temporal resolution when variable 222Rn activities are expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broecker WS, Peng T-H (1982) Tracers in the sea. Eldigio, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dymond J, Cobler R, Gordon L, Biscaye P, Mathieu G (1983) 226Ra and 222Rn contents of Galapagos Rift hydrothermal waters—the importance of low-temperature interactions with crustal rocks. Earth Planet Sci Lett 64(3):417–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gendron JF, Todd JF, Feely RA, Baker ET, Kadko DC (1994) Excess 222Rn above the cleft segment of the Juan de Fuca Ridge. J Geophys Res 99(B3):5007–5015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kadko DC, Rosenberg ND, Lupton JE, Collier RW, Lilley MD (1990) Chemical reaction rates and entrainment within the Endeavour Ridge hydrothermal plume. Earth Planet Sci Lett 99(4):315–335

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenberg ND, Lupton JE, Kadko D, Collier R, Lilley MD, Pak H (1988) Estimation of heat and chemical fluxes from a seafloor hydrothermal vent field using radon measurements. Nature 334(6183):604–607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Broecker WS (1965) An application of natural radon to problems in oceanic circulations. Proceedings Symposium on Diffusion in the Oceans and Freshwaters. Lamont Geological Observatory, New York, pp 116–145

    Google Scholar 

  7. Key RM, Brewer RL, Stockwell JH, Guinasso NL, Schink DR (1979) Some improved techniques for measuring radon and radium in marine sediments and in seawater. Mar Chem 7:251–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mathieu GG, Biscaye PE, Lupton RA, Hammond DE (1988) System for measurement of 222Rn at low levels in natural waters. Health Phys 55:989–992

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lucas HF (1957) Improved low-level alpha-scintillation counter for radon. Rev Sci Instrum 28:680–683

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Burnett WC, Dulaiova H (2003) Estimating the dynamics of groundwater input into the coastal zone via continuous radon-222 measurements. J Environ Radioact 69(1–2):21–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burnett WC, Kim G, Lane-Smith D (2001) A continuous monitor for assessment of 222Rn in the coastal ocean. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 249(1):167–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burnett WC, Aggarwal PK, Aureli A, Bokuniewicz H, Cable JE, Charette MA, Kontar E, Krupa S, Kulkarni KM, Loveless A, Moore WS, Oberdorfer JA, Oliveira J, Ozyurt N, Povinec P, Privitera AMG, Rajar R, Ramessur RT, Scholten J, Stieglitz T, Taniguchi M, Turner JV (2006) Quantifying submarine groundwater discharge in the coastal zone via multiple methods. Sci Total Environ 367:498–543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Charette MA, Moore WS, Burnett WC (2008) Uranium- and thorium-series nuclides as tracers of submarine groundwater discharge. U-Th Series Nuclides in Aquatic Systems, vol 13. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 155–191

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. McCoy C, Viso R, Peterson RN, Libes S, Lewis B, Ledoux J, Voulgaris G, Smith E, Sanger D (2011) Radon as an indicator of limited cross-shelf mixing of submarine groundwater discharge along an open ocean beach in the South Atlantic Bight during observed hypoxia. Cont Shelf Res 31(12):1306–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson RN, Burnett WC, Glenn CR, Johnson AJ (2009) Quantification of point-source groundwater discharges to the ocean from the shoreline of the Big Island, Hawaii. Limnol Oceanogr 54(3):890–904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos IR, Dimova N, Peterson RN, Mwashote B, Chanton JP, Burnett WC (2009) Extended time series measurements of submarine groundwater discharge tracers (222Rn and CH4) at a coastal site in Florida. Mar Chem 113(1–2):137–147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dulaiova H, Burnett WC, Wattayakorn G, Sojisuporn P (2006) Are groundwater inputs into river-dominated areas important? The Chao Phraya River—Gulf of Thailand. Limnol Oceanogr 51(5):2232–2247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Burnett WC, Peterson RN, Santos IR, Hicks RW (2010) Use of automated radon measurements for rapid assessment of groundwater flow into Florida streams. J Hydrol 380(3–4):298–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Peterson RN, Santos IR, Burnett WC (2010) Groundwater discharge to tidal rivers based on Rn-222 measurements and a dual-assumption approach. Estuarine, Coast Shelf Sci 86(2):165–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook PG, Lamontagne S, Berhane D, Clark JF (2006) Quantifying groundwater discharge to Cockburn River, southeastern Australia, using dissolved gas tracers 222Rn and SF6. Water Resour Res 42(W10411):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mullinger NJ, Binley AM, Pates JM, Crook NP (2007) Radon in Chalk streams: spatial and temporal variation of groundwater sources in the Pang and Lambourn catchments, UK. J Hydrol 339(3–4):172–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dimova NT, Burnett WC (2011) Evaluation of groundwater discharge into small lakes based on the temporal distribution of radon-222. Limnol Oceanogr 56(2):486–494. doi:10.4319/lo.2011.56.2.0486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dugan HA, Gleeson T, Lamoureux SF, Novakowski K (2012) Tracing groundwater discharge in a high Arctic lake using radon-222. Environ Earth Sci 66(5):1385–1392. doi:10.1007/s12665-011-1348-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kluge T, von Rohden C, Sonntag P, Lorenz S, Wieser M, Aeschbach-Hertig W, Ilmberger J (2012) Localising and quantifying groundwater inflow into lakes using high-precision Rn-222 profiles. J Hydrol 450:70–81. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weigel F (1978) Radon. Chemiker-Zeitung 102:287–299

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dulaiova H, Peterson RN, Burnett WC, Lane-Smith D (2005) A multi-detector continuous monitor for assessment of 222Rn in the coastal ocean. J Radioanal Nucl Chem V263(2):361–365

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dimova N, Burnett WC, Lane-Smith D (2009) Improved automated analysis of radon (Rn-222) and thoron (Rn-220) in natural waters. Environ Sci Technol 43(22):8599–8603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Derek Lane-Smith (Durridge Co.) for thoughtful input in optimizing the sparging chamber design, as well as Leigha Peterson, Sarah Chappel, Kelly Gregorcyk, David Young, and David Estes for assisting in laboratory and field data collection. This project was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) Ocean Technology and Interdisciplinary Coordination (OTIC; awards #OCE1029223 to RNP and #1028990 to JAB) and by the Coastal Carolina University Center for Marine and Wetland Studies. Field trials were conducted through ongoing efforts funded by a National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Science Collaborative project (award #11-1870; 21600-FB91 to CCU) and a supplemental award through the Georgia Coastal Ecosystems Long-Term Ecological Research project (NSF award #OCE0620959). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful reviews.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard N. Peterson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peterson, R.N., Breier, J.A., Harmon, L.R. et al. Development of a sparging chamber for field radon analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 298, 1347–1357 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2589-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-013-2589-5

Keywords

Navigation