Skip to main content
Log in

Geant4 model validation of Compton suppressed system for process monitoring of spent fuel

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nuclear material accountancy is of continuous concern for the regulatory, safeguards, and verification communities. In particular, spent nuclear fuel reprocessing facilities pose one of the most difficult accountancy challenges: monitoring highly radioactive, fluid sample streams in near real-time. The Multi-Isotope Process monitor will allow for near-real-time indication of process alterations using passive gamma-ray detection coupled with multivariate analysis techniques to guard against potential material diversion or to enhance domestic process monitoring. The Compton continuum from the dominant 661.7 keV 137Cs fission product peak obscures lower energy lines which could be used for spectral and multivariate analysis. Compton suppression may be able to mitigate the challenges posed by the high continuum caused by scattering. A Monte Carlo simulation using the Geant4 toolkit is being developed to predict the expected suppressed spectrum from spent fuel samples to estimate the reduction in the Compton continuum. Despite the lack of timing information between decay events in the particle management of Geant4, encouraging results were recorded utilizing only the information within individual decays without accounting for accidental coincidences. The model has been validated with single and cascade decay emitters in two steps: as an unsuppressed system and with suppression activated. Results of the Geant4 model validation will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Department of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section (2005) Technical Document-1467

  2. Orton C, Fraga C, Christensen R, Schwantes J (2011) Nucl Instrum Methods A 629:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pickett S, Doyle J (eds) (2008) Nuclear safeguards, security, and nonproliferation. Butterworth-Heinemann/Elsevier, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  4. Orton C, Fraga C, Christensen R, Schwantes J (2011) Nucl Instrum Methods A. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2011.12.083

  5. Matsson I, Grapengiesser B (1997) Appl Radiat Isot 48:1289–1298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Britton R (2011) J Radioanal Nucl Chem. doi:10.1007/s10967-011-1362-x

  7. Knoll G (2000) Radiation detection and measurement, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Landsberger S, Peshev S (1996) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 202:201–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Aryaeinejad R, Hartwell J, Scates W (2005) IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 52:1728–1732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kulisek J, Hartwell J, McIlwain M, Gardner R (2007) Nucl Instrum Methods A 580:226–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lubrun A, Bignan G (2001) Nucl Technol 135:216–229

    Google Scholar 

  12. Agostinelli S et al (2003) Nucl Instrum Methods A 506:250–303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hurtado S, Garcia-Tenorio R, Garcie-Leon M (2009) IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 56:1531–1536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Roteta M, Garcia-Toraño E (1996) Nucl Instrum Methods A 369:665–670

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Çetiner N, Ünlü K, Brenizer J (2008) J Radioanal Nucl Chem 276:615–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boson J, Ågren G, Johansson L (2008) Nucl Instrum Methods A 587:304–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was performed under the Nuclear Forensics Graduate Fellowship Program, which is sponsored by the US Department of Homeland Security, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office and the US Department of Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency. The authors thank the US Department of Energy’s Materials Protection, Accounting and Control Technology (MPACT), Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCR&D) program and the Next Generation Safeguards Initiative (NGSI), Office of Nonproliferation and International Security (NIS), National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) for funding this work. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is operated for the US Department of Energy by Battelle under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah E. Bender.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bender, S.E., Ünlü, K., Orton, C.R. et al. Geant4 model validation of Compton suppressed system for process monitoring of spent fuel. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296, 647–654 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1988-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-012-1988-3

Keywords

Navigation