Skip to main content
Log in

Photographs and Classroom Response Systems in Middle School Astronomy Classes

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of being readily available, photographs have played a minor and passive role in science classes. In our study, we present an active way of using photographs in classroom discussions with the use of a classroom response system (CRS) in middle school astronomy classes to teach the concepts of day–night and seasonal change. In this new pedagogical method, students observe objects or phenomena in photographs and use the information to develop understanding of the scientific concepts. They share their ideas in classroom discussion with the assistance of the CRS. Pre- and posttest results showed that the new pedagogy helped students overcome primitive conceptions and enhanced their understanding of the concepts. The observation of the rich details of photographs played three pedagogical roles in classroom discussion: easing students’ anxiety about learning a new scientific concept; continuous stimulus of learning; and as evidence or data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agan L (2004) Stellar ideas: exploring students’ understanding of stars. Astron Educ Rev 3(1):77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardac D, Akaygun S (2005) Using static and dynamic visuals to represent chemical change at molecular level. Int J Sci Educ 27(11):1269–1298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atwood RK, Atwood VA (1996) Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the cause of seasons. J Res Sci Teach 33(5):553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter J (1989) Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. Int J Sci Educ 11(5):502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty ID, Gerace WJ (2009) Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. J Sci Educ Technol 18(2):146–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RA, Ishee J, Lallo C (1995) The electronic picturebook and astronomy’s education initiative. In: Shaw RA, Payne HE, Hayes JJE (eds), Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 77, pp 3–7. Retrieved from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995ASPC...77....3B

  • Bullock DW, LaBella VP, Clingan T, Ding Z, Stewart G, Thibado PM (2002) Enhancing the student instructor interaction frequency. Phys Teach 40(9):535–541

  • Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE (1989) Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In: Resnick LB (ed) Knowing, learning and instruction: essays in honor of robert glaser. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 453–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin J, Strauss A (2007) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

  • Driver R, Bell B (1986) Students’ thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist view. Sch Sci Rev 67(240):443–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne RJ, Gerace WJ, Leonard WJ, Mestre JP, Wenk L (1996) Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning. J Comput High Educ 7(2):3–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop J (2000) How children observe the universe. Publ Astron Soc Aust 17(2):194–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eshach H (2010) Using photographs to probe students’ understanding of physical concepts: the case of Newton’s 3rd law. Res Sci Educ 40(4):589–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman A, Capobianco BM (2008) Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. J Sci Educ Technol 17(1):82–99

  • Fies C, Marshall J (2006) Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. J Sci Educ Technol 15(1):101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JK (2008) Visualization: an emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In: Gilbert JK, Reiner M, Nakhleh M (eds) Visualization: theory and practice in science education. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstone RL, Sakamoto Y (2003) The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cogn Psychol 46(4):414–466

  • Heywood D, Parker J, Rowlands M (2013) Exploring the visuospatial challenge of learning about day and night and the sun’s path. Sci Educ 27(5):772–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz P (2011) A case study of the use of Internet photobook technology to enhance early childhood “scientist” identity. J Sci Educ Technol 20(5):525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay R, Knaack L (2009) Exploring the use of audience response systems in secondary school science classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol 18(5):382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kikas E (2004) Teacher’s conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. J Research Sci Teach 41(5):432–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman NG (2007) Nature of science: past, present, and future. In: Abell S, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 831–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee H, Feldman A, Beatty ID (2012) Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. J Sci Educ Technol 21(5):523–539

  • Lehesvuori S, Viiri J, Rasku-Puttonen H, Moate J, Helaakoski J (2013) Visualizing communications structures in science classrooms: tracing cumulatively in teacher-led whole class discussions. J Res Sci Teach 50(8):912–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley S, Love NB, Stiles KE, Mundry SE, Hewson PW (2003) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, 2nd edn. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers G (1988) Every picture tells a story: illustrations in E.O. Wilson’s sociobiology. Hum Stud 11(2–3):235–269

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer JD (2009) Early elementary students’ development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. J Res Sci Teach 46(2):192–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer LL, Roth W-M (2003) Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(10):1089–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer-Ardenghi L, Roth W-M (2004) Making sense of photographs. Sci Educ 89(2):219–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pozzer-Ardenghi L, Roth W-M (2005) Photographs in lectures: gestures as meaning-making resources. Linguist Educ 15(3):275–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler PM (1987) Misconceptions in astronomy. In: Novak JD (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, vol 3. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 422–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, P.M. (1992). The initial knowledge state of high school astronomy students. Ed.D. Dissertation, Harvard School of Education

  • Schur Y, Galili I (2009) A Thinking Journey - A New Mode of Teaching Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7(3):627–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, T. (2007). Evaluating the Thinking Journey mode of Teaching as applied in Learning the Concept of the Day-Night Cycle. MS Thesis: Hebrew University of Jerusalem

  • Sloutsky VM, Kaminski JA, Heckler AF (2005) The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychon Bull Rev 12(3):508–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/NGSS

  • Thompson CL (1989) Discrepant events: what happens to those who watch? School Science and Mathematics 89(1):26–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper R (2001) A cross-age study of junior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. International Journal of Science Education 23(11):1111–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou S (1994) Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction 4(1):45–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou S, Brewer WF (1994) Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science 18(1):123–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yair Y, Schur Y, Mintz R (2003) A Thinking Journey to the planets using scientific visualization technologies: implications to astronomy education. J Sci Educ Technol 12(1):43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeilik M, Morris VJ (2003) An examination of misconceptions in an astronomy course for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Astronomy Education Review 2(1):101–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded in part by US National Science Foundation Grant ESI-0456124. The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors, and no official endorsement from the funder should be presumed. We thank Dr. Yaron Schur of the TJ group in Israel for his valuable comments on the CRS questions. Most of all, we would like to thank the participating teacher, Mary, and her students. Without them, this study could not have been conducted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunju Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, H., Feldman, A. Photographs and Classroom Response Systems in Middle School Astronomy Classes. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 496–508 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9539-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9539-z

Keywords

Navigation