Abstract
In spite of being readily available, photographs have played a minor and passive role in science classes. In our study, we present an active way of using photographs in classroom discussions with the use of a classroom response system (CRS) in middle school astronomy classes to teach the concepts of day–night and seasonal change. In this new pedagogical method, students observe objects or phenomena in photographs and use the information to develop understanding of the scientific concepts. They share their ideas in classroom discussion with the assistance of the CRS. Pre- and posttest results showed that the new pedagogy helped students overcome primitive conceptions and enhanced their understanding of the concepts. The observation of the rich details of photographs played three pedagogical roles in classroom discussion: easing students’ anxiety about learning a new scientific concept; continuous stimulus of learning; and as evidence or data.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agan L (2004) Stellar ideas: exploring students’ understanding of stars. Astron Educ Rev 3(1):77–97
Ardac D, Akaygun S (2005) Using static and dynamic visuals to represent chemical change at molecular level. Int J Sci Educ 27(11):1269–1298
Atwood RK, Atwood VA (1996) Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of the cause of seasons. J Res Sci Teach 33(5):553–563
Baxter J (1989) Children’s understanding of familiar astronomical events. Int J Sci Educ 11(5):502–513
Beatty ID, Gerace WJ (2009) Technology-enhanced formative assessment: a research-based pedagogy for teaching science with classroom response technology. J Sci Educ Technol 18(2):146–162
Brown RA, Ishee J, Lallo C (1995) The electronic picturebook and astronomy’s education initiative. In: Shaw RA, Payne HE, Hayes JJE (eds), Astronomical society of the pacific conference series, vol 77, pp 3–7. Retrieved from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1995ASPC...77....3B
Bullock DW, LaBella VP, Clingan T, Ding Z, Stewart G, Thibado PM (2002) Enhancing the student instructor interaction frequency. Phys Teach 40(9):535–541
Collins A, Brown JS, Newman SE (1989) Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In: Resnick LB (ed) Knowing, learning and instruction: essays in honor of robert glaser. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 453–494
Corbin J, Strauss A (2007) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 3rd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
Driver R, Bell B (1986) Students’ thinking and the learning of science: a constructivist view. Sch Sci Rev 67(240):443–456
Dufresne RJ, Gerace WJ, Leonard WJ, Mestre JP, Wenk L (1996) Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning. J Comput High Educ 7(2):3–47
Dunlop J (2000) How children observe the universe. Publ Astron Soc Aust 17(2):194–206
Eshach H (2010) Using photographs to probe students’ understanding of physical concepts: the case of Newton’s 3rd law. Res Sci Educ 40(4):589–603
Feldman A, Capobianco BM (2008) Teacher learning of technology enhanced formative assessment. J Sci Educ Technol 17(1):82–99
Fies C, Marshall J (2006) Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. J Sci Educ Technol 15(1):101–109
Gilbert JK (2008) Visualization: an emergent field of practice and enquiry in science education. In: Gilbert JK, Reiner M, Nakhleh M (eds) Visualization: theory and practice in science education. Springer, Netherlands, pp 3–24
Goldstone RL, Sakamoto Y (2003) The transfer of abstract principles governing complex adaptive systems. Cogn Psychol 46(4):414–466
Heywood D, Parker J, Rowlands M (2013) Exploring the visuospatial challenge of learning about day and night and the sun’s path. Sci Educ 27(5):772–796
Katz P (2011) A case study of the use of Internet photobook technology to enhance early childhood “scientist” identity. J Sci Educ Technol 20(5):525–536
Kay R, Knaack L (2009) Exploring the use of audience response systems in secondary school science classrooms. J Sci Educ Technol 18(5):382–392
Kikas E (2004) Teacher’s conceptions and misconceptions concerning three natural phenomena. J Research Sci Teach 41(5):432–448
Lederman NG (2007) Nature of science: past, present, and future. In: Abell S, Lederman NG (eds) Handbook of research on science education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 831–879
Lee H, Feldman A, Beatty ID (2012) Factors that affect science and mathematics teachers’ initial implementation of technology-enhanced formative assessment using a classroom response system. J Sci Educ Technol 21(5):523–539
Lehesvuori S, Viiri J, Rasku-Puttonen H, Moate J, Helaakoski J (2013) Visualizing communications structures in science classrooms: tracing cumulatively in teacher-led whole class discussions. J Res Sci Teach 50(8):912–939
Loucks-Horsley S, Love NB, Stiles KE, Mundry SE, Hewson PW (2003) Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics, 2nd edn. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks
Myers G (1988) Every picture tells a story: illustrations in E.O. Wilson’s sociobiology. Hum Stud 11(2–3):235–269
National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington
Plummer JD (2009) Early elementary students’ development of astronomy concepts in the planetarium. J Res Sci Teach 46(2):192–209
Pozzer LL, Roth W-M (2003) Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(10):1089–1114
Pozzer-Ardenghi L, Roth W-M (2004) Making sense of photographs. Sci Educ 89(2):219–241
Pozzer-Ardenghi L, Roth W-M (2005) Photographs in lectures: gestures as meaning-making resources. Linguist Educ 15(3):275–293
Sadler PM (1987) Misconceptions in astronomy. In: Novak JD (ed) Proceedings of the Second International Seminar: Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, vol 3. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 422–425
Sadler, P.M. (1992). The initial knowledge state of high school astronomy students. Ed.D. Dissertation, Harvard School of Education
Schur Y, Galili I (2009) A Thinking Journey - A New Mode of Teaching Science. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 7(3):627–646
Shapiro, T. (2007). Evaluating the Thinking Journey mode of Teaching as applied in Learning the Concept of the Day-Night Cycle. MS Thesis: Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Sloutsky VM, Kaminski JA, Heckler AF (2005) The advantage of simple symbols for learning and transfer. Psychon Bull Rev 12(3):508–513
NGSS Lead States (2013) Next generation science standards: for states, by states. Washington: The National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/NGSS
Thompson CL (1989) Discrepant events: what happens to those who watch? School Science and Mathematics 89(1):26–29
Trumper R (2001) A cross-age study of junior high school students’ conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. International Journal of Science Education 23(11):1111–1123
Vosniadou S (1994) Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction 4(1):45–69
Vosniadou S, Brewer WF (1994) Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science 18(1):123–184
Yair Y, Schur Y, Mintz R (2003) A Thinking Journey to the planets using scientific visualization technologies: implications to astronomy education. J Sci Educ Technol 12(1):43–49
Zeilik M, Morris VJ (2003) An examination of misconceptions in an astronomy course for science, mathematics, and engineering majors. Astronomy Education Review 2(1):101–119
Acknowledgments
This study was funded in part by US National Science Foundation Grant ESI-0456124. The opinions expressed are solely those of the authors, and no official endorsement from the funder should be presumed. We thank Dr. Yaron Schur of the TJ group in Israel for his valuable comments on the CRS questions. Most of all, we would like to thank the participating teacher, Mary, and her students. Without them, this study could not have been conducted.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H., Feldman, A. Photographs and Classroom Response Systems in Middle School Astronomy Classes. J Sci Educ Technol 24, 496–508 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9539-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9539-z