Abstract
In contemporary bioethics, the autonomy of the patient has assumed considerable importance. Progressing from a more limited notion of informed consent, shared decision making calls upon patients to voice the desires and preferences of their authentic self, engaging in choice among alternatives as a way to exercise deeply held values. One influential opinion in Jewish bioethics holds that Jewish law, in contradistinction to secular bioethics, limits the patient’s exercise of autonomy only in those instances in which treatment choices are sensitive to preferences. Here, we analyze a discussion in the Mishna, a foundational text of rabbinic Judaism, regarding patient autonomy in the setting of religiously mandated fasting, and commentaries in the Babylonian and Palestinian Talmuds, finding both a more expansive notion of such autonomy and a potential metaphysical grounding for it in the importance of patient self-knowledge.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry, M. J., & Edgman-Levitan, S. (2012). Shared decision making—pinnacle of patient-centered care. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(9), 780–781.
Fox, R. (1990). The evolution of American bioethics: A sociological perspective. In G. Weisz (Ed.), Social Science Perspectives on Medical Ethics (p. 206). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Quill, T. E., & Brody, H. (1996). Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: Finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Annals Intern Medicine, 125, 763–769.
Shatz, D. (1997). Concepts of autonomy in Jewish medical ethics. The Jewish Law Annual, 12, 18.
Steinberg, A. S. (2003). Encyclopedia of Jewish medical ethics. Jerusalem, Israel: Feldheim Publishers.
Wolpe, P. R. (1998). The triumph of autonomy in American bioethics: A sociological view. In R. Devries & J. Subedi (Eds.), Bioethics and Society: Sociological Investigations of the Enterprise of Bioethics (pp. 38–59). Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berger, Z., Cahan, R.J. Patient Autonomy in Talmudic Context: The Patient’s “I Must Eat” on Yom Kippur in the Light of Contemporary Bioethics. J Relig Health 55, 1778–1785 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0276-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-016-0276-x