Skip to main content
Log in

Bereavement and Traumatic Bereavement: Working with the Two-Track Model of Bereavement

  • Published:
Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bereavement following loss through death is a universal human experience, but how it is experienced and understood is mediated by many variables. In this article, we stress the importance of a bifocal approach to understanding, assessing and intervening following the loss of significant persons using the framework of the Two-Track Model of Bereavement. This model examines both biopsychosocial functioning as well as the nature of the ongoing relationship with the deceased and the death story in working with the bereaved. It is particularly suited to identify adaptive and maladaptive responses to loss and to optimally focus interventions where needed. Two case vignettes are presented to orient the discussion. Traumatic bereavements, a term indicating the interface between trauma and loss, increase the likelihood of complications following loss and these are considered. Bereavements that occur under external traumatic circumstances increase the risk for dysfunction, symptomatic difficulties and complicated grief. In addition, there are forms of traumatic bereavement that arise due to subjective elements related to aspects of the psychological relationship to the deceased and the relational bond with him or her. Clinically, there is a need to identify and understand the various aspects of the traumas of bereavement and to intervene appropriately. Interventions based on the Two-Track Model of Bereavement will be described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Nadav, O., & Rubin, S. S. (2016). Love and bereavement: Life functioning and relationship to partner and spouse in bereaved and non-bereaved young women. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 74(1), 62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and loss: Loss (Vol. 3). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, J. (1997). Trauma and recovery. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karniel-Laor, E. (2004). Post-traumatic stress disorder and grief response: Their interrelationship and the contribution of damage to the “world assumption” and “self perception”. A Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. Tel Aviv University.

  • Klass, D., Silverman, P., & Nickman, S. (Eds.). (1996). Continuing bonds: New understanding of grief. Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosminsky, P., & Jordan, J. R. (2016). Attachment-informed grief therapy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkinson, R. (1996). Cognitive behavioral grief therapy. Journal of Rational Emotive & Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 14(3), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkinson, R. (2001). Cognitive behavioral therapy of grief: A review and application. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 671–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkinson, R. (2007). Cognitive grief therapy. New York: W.W. Norton. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkinson, R. (2012). The ABC of rational response to loss. In R. A. Niemeyer (Ed.), Technique’s of grief therapy: Creative principles for counseling the bereaved (pp. 129–132). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkinson, R., & Ellis, A. (2000). The application of Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy (REBT) in traumatic and nontraumatic loss. In R. Malkinson, S. S. Rubin, & E. Witztum (Eds.), Traumatic and nontraumatic loss and bereavement: Clinical theory and practice. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press/International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkinson, R., Rubin, S. S., & Witztum, E. (Eds.). (2000). Traumatic and nontraumatic loss and bereavement: Clinical theory and practice. Madison, CT: Psychosocial Press/International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neria, Y., Gross, R., Litz, B., Maguen, S., Insel, B., et al. (2007). Prevalence and psychological correlates of complicated grief among bereaved adults 2.5–3.5 years after September 11th attacks. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20, 251–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prigerson, H. G. (2004). Complicated grief: When the path to adjustment leads to a dead-end. Bereavement Care, 23, 38–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prigerson, H. G., Frank, E., Kasl, S. V., Reynolds, C. F., III, Anderson, B., Zunebko, G. S., et al. (1995). Complicated grief and bereavement-related depression as distinct disorder: Preliminary empirical validation in elderly bereaved spouses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. (1981). A two-track model of bereavement: Theory and research. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 51(1), 101–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S. (1984). Mourning distinct from melancholia: The resolution of bereavement. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 57, 339–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S. (1999). The Two-Track Model of Bereavement: Overview, retrospect and prospect. Death Studies, 23(8), 681–714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., & Bar-Nadav, O. (2016). The Two-Track Bereavement Questionnaire for complicated grief (TTBQ-CG31). In R. Neimeyer (Ed.), Techniques of grief therapy (Vol. 2, pp. 87–98). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., Bar-Nadav, O., Malkinson, R., Koren, D., Gofer-Shnarch, M., & Michaeli, E. (2009). The two-track model of bereavement questionnaire (TTBQ): Development and findings of a relational measure. Death Studies, 33, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., & Malkinson, R. (2001). Parental response to child loss across the life-cycle: Clinical and research perspectives. In M. Stroebe, R. Hansson, W. Stroebe, & H. Schut (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research: Consequences, coping and care (pp. 219–240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., Malkinson, R., & Witztum, E. (2003). Trauma and bereavement: Conceptual and clinical issues revolving around relationships. Death Studies, 27, 667–690.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., Malkinson, R., & Witztum, E. (2008). Clinical aspects of a DSM complicated grief diagnosis: Challenges, dilemmas, and opportunities. In M. S. Stroebe, R. O. Hansson, H. Schut, & W. Stroebe (Eds.), Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention (pp. 187–206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., Malkinson, R., & Witztum, E. (2012). Working with the bereaved: Multiple lenses on loss and mourning. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, S. S., Malkinson, R., & Witztum, E. (2016). The Multiple faces of loss and bereavement: Theory and therapy. Haifa: University of Haifa/Pardess Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear, M. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Traumatic loss and the syndrome of complicated grief. PTSD Research Quarterly, 13, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, P. R., & Rubin, S. S. (2015). Bereavement/grief interventions. The encyclopedia of clinical psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, M. S., Hansson, R. O., Schut, H., & Stroebe, W. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of bereavement research and practice: Advances in theory and intervention. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebe, M. S., Schut, H., & Finkenauer, C. (2001). The traumatization of grief? A conceptual framework for understanding the trauma-bereavement interface. Israel Journal of Psychiatry, 38(3–4), 185–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Witztum, E., Malkinson, R., & Rubin, S. S. (2005). Traumatic grief and bereavement resulting from terrorism: Israeli and American perspectives. In S. C. Heilman (Ed.), Death, bereavement, and mourning. New York: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witztum, E., Malkinson, R., & Rubin, S. S. (2016). Loss, traumatic bereavement and mourning culture: The Israel example. In Y. Ataria, D. Gurevitch, H. Pedya, & Y. Neria (Eds.), International handbook of trauma and culture. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Shimshon Rubin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rubin, S.S., Witztum, E. & Malkinson, R. Bereavement and Traumatic Bereavement: Working with the Two-Track Model of Bereavement. J Rat-Emo Cognitive-Behav Ther 35, 78–87 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-016-0259-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-016-0259-6

Keywords

Navigation