Abstract
This study investigates preverbal structural and semantic processing in Japanese, a head-final language, using the maze task. Two sentence types were tested—simple scrambled sentences (Experiment 1) and control sentences (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 showed that even for simple, mono-clausal Japanese sentences, (1) there are online processing costs associated with parsing noncanonical word orders and (2) these costs are incurred during the incremental integration of constituents into developing sentence representations. Experiment 2 indicated (1) that antecedents are provisionally assigned to empty subjects in Japanese control sentences before verb information becomes available and (2) that this process is guided by an object control bias. Taken together, these findings are interpreted to suggest an important role for preverbal analysis in the processing of displaced constituents and of referential properties for empty elements in head-final languages.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head- final language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 23–54.
Aoshima, S., Yoshida, M., & Phillips, C. (2009). Incremental processing of coreference and binding in Japanese. Syntax, 12, 93–134.
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.
Betancort, M., Carreiras, M., & Acuña-Fariña, C. (2006). Processing controlled PROs in Spanish. Cognition, 100, 217–282.
Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1986). The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15, 209–224.
Clifton, C., Jr., & Frazier, L. (1989). Comprehending sentences with long-distance dependencies. In G. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 273–317). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Crain, S., & Fodor, J. D. (1985). How can grammars help parsers? In D. R. Dowty, L. Karttunen, & A. M. Zwicky (Eds.), Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives (pp. 94–128). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Forster, K. I. (2010). Using a maze task to track lexical and sentence processing. The Mental Lexicon, 5, 347–357.
Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116–124.
Forster, K. I., Guerrera, C., & Elliot, L. (2009). The maze task: Measuring forced incremental sentence processing time. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 163–171.
Frazier, L., Clifton, C., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 13, 187–222.
Gibson, E., & Warren, T. (2004). Reading-time evidence for intermediate linguistic structure in long-distance dependencies. Syntax, 7, 55–78.
Grodner, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity. Cognitive Science, 29, 261–290.
Hagiwara, H., & Caplan, D. (1990). Syntactic comprehension in Japanese aphasics: Effects of category and thematic role order. Brain and Language, 38, 159–170.
Hagiwara, H., Soshi, T., Ishihara, M., & Imanaka, K. (2007). A topographical study on the event-related potential correlates of scrambled word order in Japanese complex sentence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 175–193.
Ikuta, N., Sugiura, M., Inoue, K., Sato, S., Horie, K., & Kawashima, R. (2009). Neural basis of sentence processing in which incoming words form a sentence. NeuroReport, 20, 531–535.
Inoue, A., & Fodor, J. (1995). Information-paced parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9–63). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238.
Kamide, Y. (2006). Incrementality in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka, & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Handbook of Japanese psycholinguistics (pp. 249–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133–159.
Kim, J., Koizumi, M., Ikuta, N., Fukumitsu, Y., Kimura, N., Iwata, K., et al. (2009). Scrambling effects on the processing of Japanese sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 151–166.
Kizach, J., Nyvad, A. M., & Christensen, K. R. (2013). Structure before meaning: Sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization. PLoS ONE, 8, e76326. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076326.
Koizumi, M. (2005). Syntactic structure of ditransitive constructions in Japanese: Behavioral and imaging studies. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), The proceedings of the 6th Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Koizumi, M., & Tamaoka, K. (2010). Psycholinguistic evidence for the VP-internal subject position in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 663–680.
Kondo, T., & Yamashita, H. (2011). Why speakers produce scrambled sentences: An analysis of a spoken language corpus in Japanese. In H. Yamashita, J. Packard, & Y. Hirose (Eds.), Processing and producing head-final structures (pp. 195–215). London: Springer.
Koso, A., Hagiwara, H., & Soshi, T. (2005). Cognitive processes involved in parsing Japanese ditransitives: An event-related potential study. In Paper presented at the Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics, Tokyo.
Kwon, N., & Sturt, P. (2013). Null pronominal (pro) resolution in Korean, a discourse-oriented language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 377–387.
Mazuka, R., & Itoh, K. (1995). Can Japanese speakers be led down the garden path? In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 295–329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Cost of scrambling in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East-Asian languages (pp. 131–166). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Miyagawa, S. (1987). Lexical categories in Japanese. Lingua, 73, 29–51.
Miyamoto, E. T. (2002). Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 307–347.
Miyamoto, E. T. (2006). Processing alternative word orders in Japanese. In M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka, & Y. Shirai (Eds.), Handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics (pp. 257–263). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miyamoto, E. T. (2008). Processing sentences in Japanese. In S. Miyagawa & M. Saito (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 217–249). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miyamoto, E. T., & Nakamura, M. (2005). Unscrambling some misconceptions: A comment on Koizumi and Tamaoka (2004). Gengo Kenkyu [Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan], 128, 113–129.
Miyamoto, E. T., & Takahashi, S. (2002a). Antecedent reactivation in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. In T. Ionin, H. Ko, & A. Nevins (Eds.), The Proceedings of HU-MIT 2001-MIT working papers in linguistics 43 (pp. 123–138). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Miyamoto, E. T., & Takahashi, S. (2002b). Sources of difficulty in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East Asian languages (pp. 167–188). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Miyamoto, E. T., & Takahashi, S. (2004). Filler-gap dependencies in the processing of scrambling in Japanese. Language and Linguistics, 5, 153–166.
Nagata, H. (1991). Temporal course of activation of the antecedent by the reflexive in syntactically ambiguous sentences in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 501–520.
Nagata, H. (1992). Activation of the antecedent by the reflexive in Japanese: A supplementary control experiment. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 99–106.
Nagata, H. (1993). Verb-control information in parsing Japanese reflexive sentences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 77, 207–215.
Nagata, H. (1995a). On-Line and off-line reflexive resolution in Japanese logophoric sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 205–229.
Nagata, H. (1995b). On-line reflexive resolution in Japanese causative garden path sentences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 167–176.
Nagata, H. (1995c). Reflexive resolution in parsing Japanese logophoric and nonlogophoric sentences. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 943–953.
Nakayama, M. (1995). Scrambling and probe recognition. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese sentence processing (pp. 257–273). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nemoto, N. (1999). Scrambling. In M. Tsujimura (Ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp. 121–153). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Ninose, Y., Oda, J., Sakaki, Y., Sakamoto, T., & Gyoba, J. (1998). Ryooji-bunrichoohoo Niyoru Kuushugo Hantei Purosesu-no Bunseki (2): Gojun-no Kooka. [On the real-time processing of empty subjects in Japanese using a dichotic-listening method (2): The word order effect]. Ninchi Kagaku [Cognitive Science], 5, 82–88.
Nishimura, Y., Sugisaki, K., Hattori, N., Inokuchi, Y., Komachi, M., Nishimura, Y., et al. (2010). An event-related fNIRS investigation of Japanese word order. Experimental Brain Research, 202, 239–246.
Nishimura, Y., Sugisaki, K., Hattori, N., Inokuchi, Y., Nishimura, Y., Ogawa, M., et al. (2008). A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study on the basic word order in Japanese. NeuroReport, 9, 915–919.
Nyvad, A. M., Kizach, J., & Christensen, K. R. (2014). Structure before meaning: Sentence processing, plausibility, and subcategorization. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. doi:10.1007/s10936-014-9300-z.
Oda, J., Ninose, Y., Sakaki, Y., Gyoba, J., & Sakamoto, T. (1997). Ryooji-bunrichoohoo Niyoru Kuushugo Hantei Purosesu-no Bunseki. [On the real-time processing of empty subjects in Japanese using a dichotic-listening method]. Ninchi Kagaku [Cognitive Science], 4, 58–63.
Pritchett, B. L. (1988). Garden path phenomena and the grammatical basis of language processing. Language, 64, 539–576.
Pritchett, B. L. (1991). Head position and parsing ambiguity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 251–270.
Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Qiao, X., Shen, L., & Forster, K. (2012). Relative clause processing in Mandarin: Evidence from the maze task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27, 611–630.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506.
Sakamoto, T. (1995). Transparency between parser and grammar: On the processing of empty subjects in Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.), Japanese Sentence Processing (pp. 275–294). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sakamoto, T. (1996). Processing empty subjects in Japanese: Implications for the transparency hypothesis. Fukuoka: Kyushu University Press.
Sakamoto, T. (2002). Processing filler-gap constructions in Japanese: The case of empty subject sentences. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East Asian languages (pp. 189–221). Stanford: CSLI.
Sakamoto, T. (2006). Processing empty categories in Japanese. In M. Nakayama, R. Mazuka, & Y. Shirai (Eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics (pp. 270–276). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shibatani, M., & Kageyama, T. (1988). Word formation in a modular theory of grammar: Post-syntactic compounds in Japanese. Language, 64, 451–484.
Staub, A. (2010). Eye movements and processing difficulty in object relative clauses. Cognition, 116, 71–86.
Stowe, L. A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive Processes, 1, 227–245.
Tamaoka, K., Asano, M., Miyaoka, Y., & Yokosawa, K. (2013). Pre- and post-head processing for single- and double-scrambled sentences of a head-final language as measured by the eye tracking method. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. doi:10.1007/s10936-013-9244-8.
Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., & Miyaoka, Y. (2003). The effects of phrase-length order and scrambling in the processing of visually presented Japanese sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32, 431–454.
Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H., & Koizumi, M. (2005). Priority information used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical functions? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34, 281–332.
Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (1996). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 454–475.
Tsujimura, N. (1996). An introduction to Japanese linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Ueno, M., & Kluender, R. (2003). Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain and Language, 86, 243–271.
Ueyama, A. (1999). Two types of scrambling constructions in Japanese. In A. Barss & T. Langendoen (Eds.), Anaphora: A reference guide (pp. 23–71). Dordrecht: Foris.
Witzel, J., & Forster, K. (2014). Lexical co-occurrence and ambiguity resolution. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 29, 158–185.
Witzel, J. D., & Witzel, N. O. (2011). The processing of Japanese control sentences. In H. Yamashita, J. Packard, & Y. Hirose (Eds.), Processing and producing head-final structures (pp. 23–47). London: Springer.
Witzel, N., Witzel, J., & Forster, K. (2012). Comparisons of online reading paradigms: Eye tracking, moving-window, and maze. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 105–128.
Wolff, S., Schlesewsky, M., Hirotani, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2008). The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese. Brain and Language, 107, 133–157.
Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 163–188.
Zushi, M. (2003). Null arguments: The case of Japanese and Romance. Lingua, 113, 559–604.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This study was supported in part by a Graduate Research Grant from the Social and Behavioral Sciences Research Institute at the University of Arizona.
Appendices
Appendix A
The sentences are presented in the following order for each item set: active/canonical, active/scrambled, passive/canonical, passive/scrambled.
Appendix B
In each item, the overt embedded-clause subjects are presented in parentheses, and the SC and OC verbs are separated by a slash.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Witzel, J., Witzel, N. Incremental Sentence Processing in Japanese: A Maze Investigation into Scrambled and Control Sentences. J Psycholinguist Res 45, 475–505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9356-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-015-9356-4