Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementary Oppositions in the Construal of Self and Others

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the construal of self and others, highly diverse, idiosyncratic, and evocative adjectival terms were manifested as contrasting, opposite terms for a set of supplied constructs rather than conventional antonyms. These “personal contrasts” are seen as a neglected companion to George Kelly’s (The Psychology of Personal Constructs, 1955) conception of “personal constructs”. These construct/contrast pairings are seen as representing connected, complementary aspects of an essential unity such that each side of a pair informs the meaning of the other. This complementarity, long recognized in an extensive literature on polar, dichotomous, and binary pairs in the physical and social worlds, is seen as having applicability to many descriptive adjectives. It is suggested that adjectival complementary pairings often involve unique associative linkages, the tracing of which could prove fruitful for understanding the construal of self and others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Assn. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. (DSM-IV). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

  • Ashton M.C., Goldberg L.R. and Lee K. (2004). A hierarchical analysis of 1,710 English personality-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87: 707–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bannister D. (Eds.) (1977). New perspectives in personal construct theory. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister D. and McNair J.M.M. (1968). The evaluation of personal constructs. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohr N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chetwynd J. (1977). The psychological meaning of structural measures derived from grids. In: Slater, P. (eds) The measurement of intrapersonal space by grid technique, Dimensions of intrapersonal space (Vol 2), pp 175–194. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransella F. and Bannister D. (1977). A manual for repertory grid technique. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike C.R. (1979). The foundations of primitive thought. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeksema, J., Rullman, H. Sanchez-Valencia, V., & van der Wouden, T. (Eds.). (2001). Perspectives on negation and polarity items. Philadelphia, PA: Benjamin Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G.A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. (Vols. I & II). Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso J.A.S. and Engstrom D.A. (2006). The complementary nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch E. (2006). Personal constructs and psychodynamic psychotherapy: A case study. Psychoanalytic Psychology 23: 554–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LandfieldA.W. Epting F.A. (1987). Personal construct psychology: Clinical and personality assessment. Human Sciences Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham R. (1973). Right & Left: Essays on dual symbolic classification. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Needham R. (1987). Counterpoints. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Neimeyer R.A. and Neimeyer G.J. (2002). Advances in personal construct psychology: New directions and perspectives. Praeger, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. K. (1932). Opposition: A linguistic psychological analysis, Revised Ed., 1967. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University of Press.

  • Osgood C.E., Suci G.H. and Tannenbaum P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle A. (1975). Frames and cages: The repertory grid approach to human understanding. International University of Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler J. and Joffe W.G. (1967). The tendency to persistence in psychological function and development, with special reference to fixation and regression. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 31: 257–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slater P. (Ed.) (1976). The measurement of intrapersonal space by grid technique Explorations of intrapersonal space (Vol. I). Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Slater P. (Ed.) (1977). The measurement of intrapersonal space by grid technique: Dimensions of intrapersonal space (Vol. II). Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 35 Greenough Avenue, Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130, USA

    Ehud Koch

  2. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard University Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

    Ehud Koch

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Ehud Koch

Authors
  1. Ehud Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehud Koch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, E. Complementary Oppositions in the Construal of Self and Others. J Psycholinguist Res 37, 355–371 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9076-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-008-9076-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation