Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of a Three-Tiered Intervention Model on Physical Activity and Fitness Levels of Elementary School Children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Journal of Primary Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Response to intervention (RtI) models are frequently used in schools to tailor academic instruction to the needs of students. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of using RtI to promote physical activity (PA) and fitness in one urban elementary school. Ninety-nine students in grades 2–5 participated in up to three tiers of intervention throughout the course of one school year. Tier one included 150 min/week of physical education (increased from 90 min/week the previous year) and coordinated efforts to improve school health. Tier two consisted of 30 min/week of small group instruction based on goal setting and social support. Tier three included an after-school program for parents and children focused on healthy living. PA, cardiovascular fitness, and body composition were assessed before and after the interventions using pedometers, a 20-m shuttle run, and height/weight measurements. From pre- to post-testing, PA remained relatively stable in tier one and increased by 2349 steps/day in tier two. Cardiovascular fitness increased in tiers one and two by 1.17 and 1.35 ml/kg/min, respectively. Although body mass index did not change, 17 of the 99 students improved their weight status over the course of the school year, resulting in an overall decline in the prevalence of overweight/obesity from 59.6 to 53.5 %. Preliminary results suggest that the RtI model can be an effective way to structure PA/health interventions in an elementary school setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bai, Y., Saint-Maurice, P. F., Welk, G. J., Allums-Featherston, K., Candelaria, N., & Anderson, K. (2015). Prevalence of youth fitness in the United States: Baseline results from the NFL PLAY 60 FITNESSGRAM Partnership Project. The Journal of Pediatrics, 167(3), 662–668. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.05.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1998). Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychology & Health, 13(4), 623–649. doi:10.1080/08870449808407422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, S. E., & The Expert Committee. (2007). Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: Summary report. Pediatrics, 120, S164–S192. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2329C.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batsche, G., Elliot, J., Graden, J. L., Grimes, J., Kovaleski, J. F., Prasse, D., & Tilly III, W. D. (2005). Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeke, C. E., Oken, E., Kleinman, K. P., Rifas-Shiman, S. L., Taveras, E. M., & Gillman, M. W. (2013). Correlations among adiposity measures in school-aged children. BMC Pediatrics, 13(1), 99. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-99.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, M. K., Appleton, J. J., & Stehouwer, J. D. (2005). Meta-analytic review of responsiveness-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23(4), 381–394. doi:10.1177/073428290502300406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). School health index: A self assessment and planning guide. http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/shi/

  • Clemes, S. A., & Biddle, S. J. H. (2013). The use of pedometers for monitoring physical activity in children and adolescents: measurement considerations. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 10(2), 249–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, C. L., Tudor-Locke, C., Cragg, S., & Cameron, C. (2010). Process and treatment of pedometer data collection for youth: The Canadian Physical Activity Levels among Youth Study. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 42(3), 430–435. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b67544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Z., Truesdale, K. P., Cai, J., Koontz, M. B., & Stevens, J. (2013). Anthropometric indices as measures of body fat assessed by DXA in relation to cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents: NHANES 1999-2004. International Journal of Body Composition Research, 11(3/4), 85–95.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cureton, K. J., Plowman, S. A., & Mahar, M. T. (2013). Aerobic capacity assessments. In: S. A. Plowman & M. D. Meredith (Eds.), FITNESSGRAM/ACTIVITYGRAM reference guide (4th Ed., pp. 6-1–6-22). Dallas, TX: The Cooper Institute.

  • Dauenhauer, B. D. (2012). Applying response to intervention in physical education. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 25(5), 21–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentro, K. N., Beals, K., Crouter, S. E., Eisenmann, J. C., McKenzie, T. L., Pate, R. R., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2014). Results from the United States’ 2014 report card on physical activity for children and youth. Journal of Physical Activity & Health, 11(Suppl 1), S105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbins, M., Husson, H., DeCorby, K., & LaRocca, R. L. (2013). School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2013(2), 1–260. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. F., White, J. B., & Nicholson, T. (2007). Impact of the great body shop on student health risks: A partial replication of the Robinson (1999) analysis of the Minnesota Student Survey. California Journal of Health Promotion, 5(1), 76–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedewa, A. L., & Ahn, S. (2011). The effects of physical activity and physical fitness on children’s achievement and cognitive outcomes: A meta-analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 521–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fedewa, A. L., Candelaria, A., Erwin, H. E., & Clark, T. P. (2013). Incorporating physical activity into the schools using a 3-tiered approach. Journal of School Health, 83(4), 290–297. doi:10.1111/josh.12029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2009). Response to intervention: Preventing and remediating academic difficulties. Child Development Perspectives, 3(1), 30–37. doi:10.1111/j.1750-8606.2008.00072.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2006). Introduction to response to intervention: What, why, and how valid is it? Reading Research Quarterly, 41(1), 93–99. doi:10.1598/RRQ.41.1.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (No. NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=3

  • Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2008). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention (RtI) and multi-tier intervention in the primary grades. A practice guide (No. NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/PracticeGuide.aspx?sid=3

  • Gordon, R. S. (1983). An operational classification of disease prevention. Public Health Reports, 98(2), 107–109.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hardman, C. A., Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (2011). Effects of rewards, peer-modelling and pedometer targets on children’s physical activity: A school-based intervention study. Psychology & Health, 26(1), 3–21. doi:10.1080/08870440903318119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, L. P., Ford, A., Sabin, M. A., Crowne, E. C., & Shield, J. P. H. (2007). Clinical measures of adiposity and percentage fat loss: Which measure most accurately reflects fat loss and what should we aim for? Archives of Disease in Childhood, 92(5), 399–403. doi:10.1136/adc.2006.103986.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Institute of Medicine. (2013). Educating the student body: Taking physical activity and physical education to school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamath, C. C., Vickers, K. S., Ehrlich, A., McGovern, L., Johnson, J., Singhal, V., et al. (2008). Behavioral interventions to prevent childhood obesity: A systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized trials. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 93(12), 4606–4615. doi:10.1210/jc.2006-2411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kuczmarski, R. J., Ogden, C. L., Guo, S. S., Grummer-Strawn, L. M., Flegal, K. M., Mei, Z., et al. (2002). 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and development (No. 246). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_11/sr11_246.pdf

  • Mahar, M. T., Guerieri, A. M., Hanna, M. S., & Kemble, C. D. (2011). Estimation of aerobic fitness from 20-m multistage shuttle run test performance. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 41(4, Supplement 2), S117–S123. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, T. L., Nader, P. R., Strikmiller, P. K., Yang, M., Stone, E. J., Perry, C. L., et al. (1996). School physical education: Effect of the child and adolescent trial for cardiovascular health. Preventive Medicine, 25(4), 423–431. doi:10.1006/pmed.1996.0074.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., & Rosengard, P. (2009). Beyond the stucco tower: Design, development, and dissemination of the SPARK physical education programs. Quest, 61(1), 114–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, K. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., & Compton, D. L. (2005). Responding to nonresponders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children, 71, 445–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: Design and interpretation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakae, S., Oshima, Y., & Ishii, K. (2008). Accuracy of spring-levered and piezo-electric pedometers in primary school Japanese children. Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 27(5), 233–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogden, C. L., Carroll, M. D., Kit, B. K., & Flegal, K. M. (2014). Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011–2012. JAMA, 311(8), 806–814. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.732.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rivard, C. W., & Neufeld, N. (2007). A comprehensive outcome analysis of a multi-site, multi-state family-based pediatric weight management program. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 107(8), A11. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2007.05.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SHAPE America. (2015). The essential components of physical education. Reston, VA: SHAPE America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaya, F. T., Flores, D., Gbarayor, C. M., & Wang, J. (2008). School-based obesity interventions: A literature review. Journal of School Health, 78(4), 189–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrill, C. (2008). Response to intervention (RtI): Application to adapted physical activity. Palaestra, 24(1), 57–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore, S. M., Sachs, M. L., DuCette, J. P., & Libonati, J. R. (2014). Step-count promotion through a school-based intervention. Clinical Nursing Research, 23(4), 402–420. doi:10.1177/1054773813485240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonsson, R. J., & Pan, Y. (2013). Prevention: A public health framework. In V. Buysse & E. S. Peisner-Feinberg (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention in early childhood (pp. 27–40). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecker, P. M., Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2008). Progress monitoring as essential practice within response to intervention. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 27(4), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, T. L., Silliman-French, L., Kinnison, L., & French, R. (2010). Implementation of a response-to-intervention system in general physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 81(9), 47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, W. B., Malina, R. M., Blimkie, C. J. R., Daniels, S. R., Dishman, R. K., Gutin, B., et al. (2005). Evidence based physical activity for school-age youth. The Journal of Pediatrics, 146(6), 732–737. doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.01.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • The Cooper Institute. (2013). In: M. D. Meredith & G. J. Welk (Eds.), FitnessGram & ActivityGram test administration manual. (4th Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

  • Tudor-Locke, C., Craig, C. L., Beets, M. W., Belton, S., Cardon, G. M., Duncan, S., et al. (2011). How many steps/day are enough? for children and adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), 78. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-8-78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, S. D., & Sidman, C. L. (2003). Determining measurement error in digital pedometers. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 7(1), 19–24. doi:10.1207/S15327841MPEE0701_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedl, R. J. (2005). Response to intervention: An alternative to traditional eligibility criteria for students with disabilities. Saint Paul, MN: Education Evolving. http://www.educationevolving.org/pdf/Response_to_Intervention.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Northern Colorado, Gunter Hall 2650, Campus Box 39, Greeley, CO, 80639, USA

    Brian Dauenhauer

  2. Curriculum and Instruction, The University of Texas at Austin, 1912 Speedway Stop D5000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA

    Xiaofen Keating

  3. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, The University of Texas at Austin, 2109 San Jacinto Blvd., Austin, TX, 78712-1415, USA

    Dolly Lambdin

Authors
  1. Brian Dauenhauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaofen Keating
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dolly Lambdin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Dauenhauer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report in the publication of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dauenhauer, B., Keating, X. & Lambdin, D. Effects of a Three-Tiered Intervention Model on Physical Activity and Fitness Levels of Elementary School Children. J Primary Prevent 37, 313–327 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-016-0430-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-016-0430-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation