Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Sodium Bisulfite on the Physicochemical and Adhesion Properties of Canola Protein Fractions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focused on investigating the potential of using canola protein fractions as bio-degradable wood adhesives. Native and sodium bisulfite (NaHSO3)-modified canola protein fractions isolated successively at different pH values (7.0, 5.5, and 3.5) was used as adhesives. Wood specimens were assembled with adhesives at a pressure of 2 MPa at 150, 170, or 190 °C for 10 min. The adhesion performance of adhesives were evaluated by wet, soak, and dry shear strength. Their physicochemical properties: extractability, electrophoresis profiles, thermal, rheological and morphological properties were also characterized. Results showed that canola protein had the highest protein yield and purity at pH 5.5. Electrophoresis profile proved that NaHSO3 cleaved the disulfide bonds in canola protein. This could induce extra charges (RS-SO3 −) on the protein surface, leading to the reduced apparent viscosity. Thermal analysis implied that the thermal transition temperature of canola protein decreased with modification of NaHSO3. Canola protein adhesives showed excellent dry and soak shear strength with 100 % wood cohesive failure in all curing temperatures. The wet adhesion strength of native and modified canola protein fraction adhesives at pH 5.5 and pH 3.5 (3.9–4.1 MPa) was higher than the fractions at pH 7.0. NaHSO3 had insignificant effects on the adhesion performance of canola protein adhesives but notably improved the handling and flow-ability properties of canola protein adhesives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wool PR, Sun XS (2005) Bio-based polymers and composites, 1st edn. Elsevier, Burlington, pp 327–368

    Google Scholar 

  2. USDA (2011) Oilseeds: world markets and trade. http://www.fas.usda.gov/oilseeds/circular/2011/March/oilseeds.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2011

  3. Aider M, Barbana C (2011) Canola proteins: composition, extraction, functional properties, bioactivity, applications as a food ingredient and allergenicity—a practical and critical review. Trends Food Sci Tech 22:21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoglund AS, Rodin J, Larsson E, Rask L (1992) Plant Physiol 98(2):509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Monsalve RI, Rodriguez R (1990) J Exp Bot 41:89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Krzyzaniak A, Burova T, Barciszewski J (1998) Nahrung 42:201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Berot S, Compoint JP, Larre C, Malabat C, Gueguen J (2005) Large scale purification of rapeseed proteins (Brassica napus L). J Chromatogr B 818(1):35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwenke KD, Raab B, Plietz P, Damaschun G (1983) Nahrung 27:165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu J, Muir AD (2008) J Food Sci 73:210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wäsche A, Wurst S, Borcherding A, Luck T (1998) Nahrung 42:269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pedroche J, Yust MM, Lqari H, Giron-Calle J, Alaiz M, Vioque J, Millan F (2004) Food Chem 88(3):337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tzeng YM, Diosady LL, Rubin LJ (1988) J Food Sci 53(5):1537

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lonnerdal B, Janson JC (1972) Biochim Biophys Acta 278(1):175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Manamperi WAR, Chang SKC, Ulven CA, Pryor SW (2010) J Am Oil Chem Soc 87:909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li N, Qi G, Sun XS, Stamm MJ, Wang D (2011) J Am Oil Chem Soc. doi:10.1007/s11746-011-1977-7

  16. AOAC International (1995) Crude protein combustion method. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 15th edn. AOAC International. Method 990.03. Gaithersburg, MD

  17. AOAC International (1995) Fat(crude) or ether extracts in food and animal feed-Soxhlet method. Official methods of analysis of AOAC International, 15th edn. AOAC International. Method 920.39C. Gaithersburg, MD

  18. AOCS (1996) Approved method Ba 6a-05: crude fiber analysis in feeds by filter bag technique. Official method and recommended practices, 4th edn. American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign

  19. Laemmli UK (1970) Nature 227:680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mo X, Sun XS, Wang D (2004) J Am Oil Chem Soc 81:395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM D2339-98; ASTM D1183-96; ASTM D1151-00 (2002) Annual book of ASTM standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp 158–160, pp 70–73, pp 67–69

  22. Choi SJ, Woo HD, Ko SH, Moon TW (2008) Cereal Chem 85(1):65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kalapathy U, Hettiarachchy N, Myers D, Rhee K (1996) J Am Oil Chem Soc 73:1063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Blaicher FM, Elstner F, Stein W, Mukherjee KD (1983) J Agric Food Chem 31(2):58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sosulski FW, Dabrowski KJ (1984) J Agric Food Chem 32(5):1172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Manamperi WA, Pryor SW, Chang SKC (2007) Transactions of the ASABE. Paper number, RRV–07116

  27. Li N, Wang Y, Tilley M, Bean S, Wu X, Sun XS, Wang D (2011) J Polym Environ 19:755–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnamoorthy U, Muscato TV, Sniffen CJ, Van Soest PJ (1982) J Dairy Res 65:217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Albin DM, Wubben JE, Gabert VM (2000) J Agric Food Chem 48:1684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Oomah BD, Mazza G (1995) Inform 6(11):1246

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mo X, Sun XS, Wang Y (1999) J Appl Polym Sci 73:2595

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu DYM, Litster JD, White ET (2007) Trans Am Inst Chem Eng 53:514

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is contribution no. 12-050-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experimental Station, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Ningbo Li & Donghai Wang

  2. Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, USA

    Guangyan Qi & Xiuzhi Susan Sun

Authors
  1. Ningbo Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangyan Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiuzhi Susan Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donghai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donghai Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, N., Qi, G., Sun, X.S. et al. Effects of Sodium Bisulfite on the Physicochemical and Adhesion Properties of Canola Protein Fractions. J Polym Environ 20, 905–915 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0490-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-012-0490-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation