Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Approach for Verifying the Accuracy of X-ray Computed Tomography Measurements of Surface Topographies in Additively Manufactured Metal Parts

  • Published:
Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface topographies of metal additively manufactured components are inherently characterized by the presence of complex surface characteristics that are not accessible by contact or optical measuring techniques. Micro X-ray computed tomography is capable of measuring non-accessible surfaces and micro-scale surface features, including undercuts. In this work, an innovative approach for evaluating the accuracy and establishing the traceability of surface topography measurements obtained by X-ray computed tomography is presented. Reference samples produced by selective laser melting of Ti6Al4V were specifically designed in order to acquire reference cross-sectional surface profiles representing the actual morphology (including re-entrant features) using an imaging probing system. Surface topographies were measured on these samples by using three different techniques: X-ray computed tomography, confocal microscopy and focus variation. Moreover, the effect of different voxel dimensions on the accuracy of surface topography measurements performed by X-ray computed tomography was investigated. Results showed that X-ray computed tomography (at the highest tested resolution) can acquire surfaces and re-entrant features with small deviations with respect to the reference profiles; the deviations were quantified. On the contrary, focus variation and confocal microscopy can measure surfaces obtaining results that are close to the reference profiles only if such surfaces have no undercuts or inaccessible features.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levy, G.N., Schindel, R., Kruth, J.P.: Rapid manufacturing and rapid tooling with layer manufacturing (LM) technologies, state of the art and future perspectives. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 52(2), 589–609 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wits, W.W., Carmignato, S., Zanini, F., Vaneker, T.: Porosity testing methods for the quality assessment of selective laser melted parts. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 65(1), 201–204 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gibson, I., Rosen, D.W., Stucker, B.: Additive Manufacturing Technologies. Springer, New York (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Townsend, A., Senin, N., Blunt, L., Leach, R., Taylor, J.S.: Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review. Precis. Eng. 46, 34–47 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salzinger, M. et al. (2010). Analysis and comparison of the surface filtering characteristics of CT and tactile measurements. In: 6th ICT Conference, Wels, Austria

  6. Carmignato, S., Aloisi, V., Medeossi, F., Zanini, F., Savio, E.: Influence of surface roughness on computed tomography dimensional measurements. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. ISO 25178-2:2012 Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—surface texture: areal—Part 2: terms, definitions and surface texture parameters. ISO, Geneva

  8. Thompson, A., Senin, N., Giusca, C., Leach, R.: Topography of selectively laser melted surfaces: a comparison of different measurement methods. CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 66, 543–546 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Townsend, A., Pagani, L., Scott, P.J., Blunt, L.: Areal surface texture data extraction from X-ray computed tomography reconstructions of metal additively manufactured parts. Precis. Eng. 48, 254–264 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerckhofs, G., Pyka, G., Moesen, M., Van Bael, S., Schrooten, J., Wevers, M.: High-resolution microfocus x-ray computed tomography for 3D surface roughness measurements of additive manufactured porous materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 15, 153–158 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carmignato, S., Dewulf, W., Leach, R.: Industrial X-ray Computed Tomography. Springer, New York (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59573-3_4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Zanini, F., Carmignato, S.: Two-spheres method for evaluating the metrological structural resolution in dimensional computed tomography. Meas. Sci. Technol. 28, 114002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/aa85b7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Whitehouse, D.J.: Surfaces and Their Measurement. Hermes Penton Science, London (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Zanini, F., Sbettega, E., Sorgato, M., Carmignato, S. (2018). Accuracy of surface topography measurements performed by X-ray computed tomography on additively manufactured metal parts. In: euspen’s 18th Conference, Venice, Italy

  15. VDI/VDE 2630—2.1:2015—Computed tomography in dimensional measurement—determination of the uncertainty of measurement and the test process suitability of coordinate measurement systems with CT sensors. VDI/VDE Society for Metrology and Automation Engineering (GMA), Duesseldorf

  16. ISO 15530-3:2011, Geometrical product specifications (GPS)—coordinate measuring machines (CMM): technique for determining the uncertainty of measurement—Part 3: use of calibrated workpieces or standards, ISO

  17. ISO 4288:1996 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface texture: profile method—rules and procedures for the assessment of surface texture. ISO, Geneva

  18. Pagani, L., Qi, Q., Jiang, X., Scott, P.J.: Towards a new definition of areal surface texture parameters on freeform surface. Measurement 109, 281–291 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zanini, F., Sbettega, E., Carmignato, S.: X-ray computed tomography for metal additive manufacturing: challenges and solutions for accuracy enhancement. Procedia CIRP 75, 114–118 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pagani, L., Zanini, F., Carmignato, S., Jiang, X., Scott, P.J. (2018). Generalization of profile texture parameters for additively manufactured surfaces. In: XXII IMEKO World Congress, Belfast (UK)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Raffaele Berardi, University of Padova, for his contribution with the experimental analyses. This work has received funding from the University of Padua, under Projects Nr. CPDA151522/15 and BIRD167853/16.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Vicenza, Italy

    Filippo Zanini, Elia Sbettega & Simone Carmignato

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

    Marco Sorgato

Authors
  1. Filippo Zanini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elia Sbettega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marco Sorgato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simone Carmignato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Zanini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zanini, F., Sbettega, E., Sorgato, M. et al. New Approach for Verifying the Accuracy of X-ray Computed Tomography Measurements of Surface Topographies in Additively Manufactured Metal Parts. J Nondestruct Eval 38, 12 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0547-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-018-0547-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation