Skip to main content
Log in

Weight optimization in HDMR with perturbation expansion method

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High dimensional model representation method forms an effective divide-and-conquer method used for the truncated representation of a multivariate function, having N independent variables, in terms of certain number (\(<\)2\(^N\)) of less variate functions. The main aim of this method is not to use all these functions in the representation and to obtain an approximation to the given problem. This results in a need of having a good convergence performance just as it is expected in the other numerical methods. This work aims to increase the convergence rate of HDMR approximation by optimizing the weight function, which appears in the method as Prof. Rabitz suggested first, with the help of the perturbation expansion and fluctuationlessness theory. This work also includes a computational procedure with the help of a testing function to better understand the steps of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.M. Sobol, Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Model. Comput. Exp. (MMCE) 1, 407–414 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Chowdhury, B.N. Rao, Hybrid high dimensional model representation for reliability analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198, 753–765 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M.C. Gomez, V. Tchijov, F. Leon, A. Aguilar, A tool to improve the execution time of air quality models. Environ. Model. Softw. 23, 27–34 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. I. Banerjee, M.G. Ierapetritou, Design optimization under parameter uncertainty for general black-box models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 41, 6687–6697 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B.N. Rao, R. Chowdhury, Probabilistic analysis using high dimensional model representation and fast fourier transform. Int. J. Comput. Methods Eng. Sci. Mech. 9, 342–357 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Ziehn, A.S. Tomlin, A global sensitivity study of sulfur chemistry in a premixed methane flame model using HDMR. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 40, 742–753 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Rabitz, Ö. Alış, General foundations of high dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. 25, 197–233 (1999)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ö. Alış, H. Rabitz, Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. 29, 127–142 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Li, C. Rosenthal, H. Rabitz, High dimensional model representations. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 7765–7777 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Demiralp, High dimensional model representation and its application varieties. Math. Res. 9, 146–159 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. B. Tunga, M. Demiralp, Hybrid high dimensional model representation approximants and their utilization in applications. Math. Res. 9, 438–446 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M.A. Tunga, M. Demiralp, Hybrid high dimensional model representation (HHDMR) on the partitioned data. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 185, 107–132 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. T. Ziehn, A.S. Tomlin, GUI-HDMR—a software tool for global sensitivity analysis of complex models. Environ. Model. Softw. 24, 775–785 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Sridharan, T. Chen, Modeling multiple input switching of CMOS gates in DSM technology using HDMR. Proc. Design Autom. Test Eur. 1–3, 624–629 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Banerjee, M.G. Ierapetritou, Parametric process synthesis for general nonlinear models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 1499–1512 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. V.U. Unnikrishnan, A.M. Prasad, B.N. Rao, Development of fragility curves using high-dimensional model representation. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 42, 419–430 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.H. Nayfeh, Perturbation Methods (Wiley, New York, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Kevorkian, J.D. Cole, Perturbation Methods in Applied Mathematics (Springer, New York, 1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Tunga, M. Demiralp, Constancy maximization based weight optimization in high dimensional model representation. Numer. Algorithms 52, 435–459 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Tunga, M. Demiralp, Constancy maximization based weight optimization in high dimensional model representation for multivariate functions. J. Math. Chem. 49, 1996–2012 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Demiralp, A new fluctuation expansion based method for the univariate numerical integration under gaussian weights. in 8-th International WSEAS Conference on Applied Mathematics, 16–18 December 2005, Tenerife, Spain, pp. 68–73 (2005)

  22. K. Hoffman, R. Kunze, Linear Algebra (Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1971)

    Google Scholar 

  23. W. Oevel, F. Postel, S. Wehmeier, J. Gerhard, The MuPAD Tutorial (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Burcu Tunga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tunga, B., Demiralp, M. Weight optimization in HDMR with perturbation expansion method. J Math Chem 53, 2155–2171 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-015-0537-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10910-015-0537-z

Keywords

Navigation