Abstract
Parasite-mediated sexual selection theory suggests that females may choose male partners who possess a relatively low pathogen load in order to maximize their reproductive investment (e.g. by avoiding pathogens or producing pathogen-resistant offspring). However, males might also maximize their reproductive investment by preferring unparasitized females; even in non-sex-role-reversed systems where female choice predominates. We address this hypothesis in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster where female choice plays a major selective role. Females in this system exhibit reduced fecundity when parasitized, creating the opportunity for simultaneous parasite-mediated male choice. To address our hypothesis, virgin females were either prick-injected with a sub-lethal dose of the gram-negative bacteria Pseudomonas aeuginosa (pricked-parasitized group, PP), prick-injected with sterile media (pricked-unparasitized group, PU) or unpricked and unparasitized (UU group). Twenty-four hours post-infection, females were decapitated to minimize the confounding effects of female behavior on male preference (decapitated females will stand upright, but lack reproductive behavior). Males were then assigned to one of two different two-choice trials (experiment A: PU versus UU females or experiment B: PP versus UU females) and their courtship behavior monitored. In experiment A, males exhibited no courtship preference for either female. However, experiment B males preferentially courted UU females more often than PP females. These results suggest that males prefer unparasitized mates, which could play a significant role in shaping disease resistance in this system. These data also provide some of the first evidence that males prefer unparasitized females in systems that do not exhibit sex-role reversal.
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B-Methodol 57:289–300
Bonduriansky R (2001) The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 76:305–339. doi:10.1017/s1464793101005693
Byrne PG, Rice WR (2006) Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 273:917–922. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3372
Cook R, Cook A (1975) Attractiveness to males of female Drosophila melanogaster - effects of mating, age and diet. Anim Behav 23:521–526. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(75)90129-3
Cureton JC, Martin RE, Lewis RL, Stoops SB, Deaton R (2011) Effects of a trematode infestation on body condition, reproduction and mating behaviors in a livebearing fish. Behaviour 148:967–984. doi:10.1163/000579511x587282
Deaton R (2009) Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis). Behav Process 80:1–6. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2008.07.010
Edward DA, Chapman T (2011) The evolution and significance of male mate choice. Trends Ecol Evol 26:647–654. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.07.012
Edward DA, Chapman T (2013) Life history variation in male mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 86:269–275. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.014
Folstad I, Karter AJ (1992) Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat 139:603–622
Gwynne DT (1991) Sexual competition among females - what cuases courtship-role reversal. Trends Ecol Evol 6:118–121. doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90089-g
Hamilton WJ, Poulin R (1997) The Hamilton and Zuk hypothesis revisited: a meta-analytical approach. Behaviour 134:299–320. doi:10.1163/156853997x00485
Hamilton WD, Zuk M (1982) Heritable true fitness and bright birds - a role for parasites. Science 218:384–387
Houde AE, Torio AJ (1992) Effect of parasitic infection on male color pattern and female choice in guppies. Behav Ecol 3:346–351. doi:10.1093/beheco/3.4.346
Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ (1991) The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33–38. doi:10.1038/350033a0
Taf L, Pischedda A, Stewart AD, Rice WR (2009) A cost of sexual attractiveness to high-fitness females. PLoS Biol 7 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000254
Lupold S, Manier MK, Ala-Honkola O, Belote JM, Pitnick S (2011) Male Drosophila melanogaster adjust ejaculate size based on female mating status, fecundity, and age. Behav Ecol 22:184–191. doi:10.1093/beheco/arq193
McKean KA, Yourth CP, Lazzaro BP, Clark AG (2008) The evolutionary costs of immunological maintenance and deployment. BMC Evol Biol 8
Moller AP, Christe P, Lux E (1999) Parasitism, host immune function, and sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 74:3–20. doi:10.1086/392949
Nandy B, Joshi A, Ali ZS, Sen S, Prasad NG (2012) Degree of adaptive male mate choice is positively correlated with female quality variance Scientific Reports 2 doi:10.1038/srep00447
Partridge L (1980) Mate choice increases a component of offspring fitness in fruit-flies. Nature 283:290–291. doi:10.1038/283290a0
Reinhold K, Kurtz J, Engqvist L (2002) Cryptic male choice: sperm allocation strategies when female quality varies. J Evol Biol 15:201–209. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00390.x
Roberts ML, Buchanan KL, Evans MR (2004) Testing the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: a review of the evidence. Anim Behav 68:227–239. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.05.001
Rosenqvist G, Johansson K (1995) Male avoidance of parasitized females explained by direct benefits in a pipefish. Anim Behav 49:1039–1045. doi:10.1006/anbe.1995.0133
Shorey HH, Bartell RJ (1970) Role of volatile female sex pheromone in stimulating male courtship behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim Behav 18:159. doi:10.1016/0003-3472(70)90085-0
Trivers RL (1972) Parental inverstment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the decent of man, 1871–1971. Aldine-Atherton, Chicago, pp 136–179
Wigby S, Domanitskaya EV, Choffat Y, Kubli E, Chapman T (2008) The effect of mating on immunity can be masked by experimental piercing in female Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 54:414–420. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.10.010
Acknowledgments
We thank Louisa Collins and Ian Kutch for assistance with data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wittman, T., Fedorka, K.M. Male Mate Choice for Unparasitized Females in Drosophila melanogaster . J Insect Behav 28, 37–43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9478-9
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-014-9478-9