Abstract
Within the prominent debate on disaffiliation and coping strategies of middle-class households in mixed neighbourhoods, the paper aims to shed light on a less researched question: what are the characteristics of middle-class households that form inter-ethnic and inter-social networks in mixed communities in contrast to those that do not? Based on exploratory research in a German inner-city neighbourhood, we focus on differentiations within the middle class. We identify two most contrasting groups as regards social boundary crossing or social closure and analyse their different preferences, values and routines. Neighbourhood foci such as parent initiatives concerning childcare or schooling have a reinforcing role for either intra-group networks or boundary-crossing interactions. The findings are based on an analysis of narratives, daily routines and social networks of middle-class family households in a gentrifying neighbourhood.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Neighbourhood statistics provide figures for German citizens with second nationality and foreign citizens only. According to these, in one part of our study area 32 % and in the other 27 % of the population had a migration background in 2014. The total population with migration background is thus higher than the official figures.
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Andreotti, A., Le Galès, P., & Moreno Fuentes, F. J. (2013). Controlling the urban fabric: The complex game of distance and proximity in European upper-middle-class residential strategies. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(2), 576–597.
Atkinson, R. (2006). Padding the bunker: Strategies of middle-class disaffiliation and colonisation in the city. Urban Studies, 43(4), 819–832.
Atkinson, R., & Kintrea, K. (2000). Owner occupation, social mix and neighbourhood impacts. Policy and Politics, 28, 93–108.
Ball, S. J., Vincent, C., Kemp, S., & Pietikainen, S. (2004). Middle class fractions, childcare and the ‘relational’ and ‘normative’ aspects of class practices. The Sociological Review, 52, 478–502.
Blokland, T. (2003). Urban bonds. Social relations in an inner city neighbourhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Blokland, T., & van Eijk, G. (2010). Do people who like diversity practice diversity in neighbourhood life? Neighbourhood use and the social networks of ‘diversity-seekers’ in a mixed neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(2), 313–332.
Blokland, T., & van Eijk, G. (2012). Mixture without mating: Partial gentrification in the case of Rotterdam, The Netherlands. In G. Bridge, T. Butler, & L. Lees (Eds.), Mixed communities: Gentrification by stealth (pp. 299–318). Bristol: Policy Press.
Boterman, W. R. (2013). Dealing with diversity. Middle-class family households and the issue of ‘black’ and ‘white’ schools in Amsterdam. Urban Studies, 50(6), 1130–1147.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten. Sonderheft 2 der Zeitschrift ‘Soziale Welt’ (pp. 183–198). Göttingen: Otto Schwartz Verlag.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Bourdieu, P. (1999). Site effects. In P. Bourdieu, et al. (Eds.), The weight of the world. Social suffering in contemporary world (pp. 123–129). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bridge, G., Butler, T., & Lees, L. (Eds.). (2012). Mixed communities. Gentrification by stealth?. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Brown-Saracino, J. (2009). A neighbourhood that never changes. Gentrification, social preservation, and the search for authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, T. (2003). Living in the bubble: Gentrification and its ‘others’ in North London. Urban Studies, 40(12), 2469–2486.
Butler, T., & Robson, G. (2001). Social capital, gentrification and neighbourhood change in London: A comparison of three south London neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2145–2162.
Butler, T., & Robson, G. (2003). London calling. The middle classes and the remaking of inner London. Oxford: Berg.
Buzar, St, Ogden, Ph, Hall, R., Haase, A., Kabisch, S., & Steinfuehrer, A. (2007). Splintering urban populations: Emergent landscapes of reurbanisation in four European cities. Urban Studies, 44(4), 651–677.
Goodsell, T. L. (2013). Familification: Family, neighbourhood change, and housing policy. Housing Studies, 28, 845–868.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Karsten, L. (2014). From yuppies to yupps: Family gentrifiers consuming spaces and re-inventing cities. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 105(2), 175–188.
Kleinhans, R. (2004). Social implications of housing diversification in urban renewal: A review of recent literature. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19, 367–390.
Lamont, M., & Molnar, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.
Lees, L., Butler, T., & Bridge, G. (2012). Introduction: Gentrification, social mixing and mixed communities. In G. Bridge, T. Butler, & L. Lees (Eds.), Mixed communities: Gentrification by stealth (pp. 1–14). Bristol: Policy Press.
Ley, D. (1996). The new middle class and the remaking of the central city. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nast, J., & Blokland, T. (2014). Social mix revisited: Neighbourhood institutions as setting for boundary work and social capital. Sociology, 2014(48), 482–499.
Oldenburg, R., & Brisset, D. (1982). The third place. Qualitative Sociology, 5(4), 265–284.
Pinkster, F. (2013). “I Just Live Here”: Everyday practices of disaffiliation of middle-class households in disadvantaged neighbourhoods. Urban Studies. Published online before print June 4, 2013. doi:10.1177/0042098013489738.
Savage, M., Bagnall, G., & Longhurst, B. (2005). Globalization and belonging. London: Sage.
Sennett, R. (2008). The uses of disorder. Personal identity and city life. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Small, M. (2009). Unanticipated gains: Origins of network inequality in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smets, P., & Kreuk, N. (2008). Together or separate in the neighbourhood? Contacts between natives and Turks in Amsterdam. The Open Urban Studies Journal, 2008(1), 35–47.
Smets, P., & Watt, P. (2013). Editorial. Exclusion and belonging in urban public and quasi-public space. The Open Urban Studies Journal, 1, 27–29.
Tilly, C. (2004). Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 34(2), 211–236.
Tissot, S. (2011). Of dogs and men: The making of spatial boundaries in a gentrifying neighborhood. City & Community, 10(3), 265–284.
Valentine, G. (2008). Living with difference: Reflections on geographies of encounter. Progress in human geography lecture. Progress in Human Geography, 32(3), 323–337.
Van Eijk, G. (2010). Unequal networks. Spatial segregation, relationships and inequality in the city. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Van Gent, W. P. C., Musterd, S., & Ostendorf, W. (2009). Bridging the social divide? Reflections on current Dutch Neighbourhood policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 24, 357–368.
Wacquant, L. (2008). Relocating gentrification: The working class, science and the state in recent urban research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(1), 198–205.
Watt, P. (2009). Living in an oasis: Middle-class disaffiliation and selective belonging in an English suburb. Environment and Planning A, 41(12), 2874–2892.
Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. The American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.
Wittebrood, K., & Permentier, M. (2011). Wonen, wijken & interventies. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Christine Bawrick for comments on an earlier version of this article. We also would like to thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weck, S., Hanhörster, H. Seeking Urbanity or Seeking Diversity? Middle-class family households in a mixed neighbourhood in Germany. J Hous and the Built Environ 30, 471–486 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9425-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9425-2