Abstract
New regulations on the allocation of social housing recently came into effect in the Netherlands as a result of a state-support complaint filed by institutional investors to the European Commission. At least 90 % of vacant social housing dwellings has to be allocated to households with a yearly income of less than €34,000. This has caused concerns about the availability of housing among (lower-)middle-income households. They can no longer access social housing, and due to the prevalence of social housing and the fiscal favoring of owner-occupied housing, the affordable private rented sector is almost absent in the Netherlands. Thus, currently they rely on the owner-occupied housing market with their restricted financial budgets and might lose out. This study substantiates this assumed “squeezed middle” problem with empirical data for housing regions in the Netherlands. The adopted spatial analysis method shows to what extent and where lower-middle-income households have access to homeownership in the Netherlands, and how the “squeezed middle” varies among the Dutch regional housing markets. The spatial analysis indicates that in some regions, there indeed is a group of middle-income households that is “squeezed.” Yet, the study also reveals that the problem might be more qualitative than quantitative in nature: households may not be able or willing to trade-off location for access to more affordable or more appropriate housing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aalbers, M. (2009). Geographies of the financial crisis. Area, 41(1), 34–42.
Bertram, A., & Helderman, J. K. (2008). Wat gaan we doen met de woningcorporatie. In F. J. H. Don (Ed.), Agenda voor de woningmarkt. Amsterdam: Koninklijke Vereniging voor Staatshuishoudkunde.
Blessing, A. (2012). Magical or monstrous? Hybridity in social housing governance. Housing Studies, 27(2), 189–207.
Blessing, A. (2014). Magical or monstrous? Understanding market oriented reforms of social rental housing. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
Boelhouwer, P., & Priemus, H. (2012). Housing system reform: the opinion of advisory boards versus political reality in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 27(4), 527–542.
CBS (2013). Nieuwbouwwoningen; bouwvergunningen, gereedgekomen, 1995–2012. http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=37548&D1=13-16,23,26,29-30&D2=0-4&D3=16,101,186,237,254-l&HD=100525-1040&HDR=T&STB=G1,G2. Accessed on June 25, 2013.
Chakrabarti, R., & Zhang, J. (2014). Unaffordable housing and local employment growth: Evidence from California Municipalities. IZA Discussion Papers 7562. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.
Elsinga, M., & Lind, H. (2013). The Effect of EU-legislation on rental systems in Sweden and the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 28(7), 960–970.
Eskinasi, M., De Groot, C., van Middelkoop, M., Verwest, F., & Conijn, J. (2012). Effecten van de staatssteunregeling voor de middeninkomensgroepen op de woningmarkt. The Hague: Planbureau voor de Leefongeving.
Fainstein, S. S. (2010). The just City. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Gilderbloom, J. I., Hanka, M. J., & Lasley, C. B. (2009). Amsterdam: Planning and policy for the ideal city? Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 14(6), 473–493.
Haffner, M. E. A. (2002). Dutch personal income tax reform 2001: An exceptional position for owner-occupied housing. Housing Studies, 17(3), 521–534.
Haffner, M. E. A., & Boumeester, H. J. F. M. (2010). The affordability of housing in the Netherlands: An increasing income gap between renting and owning? Housing Studies, 25(6), 799–820.
Hananel, R. (2013). Can centralization, decentralization and welfare go together? The case of Massachusetts Affordable Housing Policy (Ch. 40B). Urban Studies. Epub ahead of print 23 December 2013. doi:10.1177/0042098013512877.
Kromhout, S., Smeulders, E., & Scheele-Goedhart, J. (2010). Tussen wal en schip: Twee deelstudies naar de gevolgen van de 90%-norm. Amsterdam: RIGO Research en Advies BV.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writing on cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ministrty of General Affairs (2010). Leefbaarometer. www.leefbaarometer.nl. Accessed on 25, 2013.
Mumford, L. (2011 [1937]). What is a city?. In R.T. LeGates & F. Stout (Eds). The City reader. London: Routledge.
Neuteboom, P., & Brounen, D. (2011). Assessing the accessibility of the homeownership market. Urban Studies, 48(11), 2231–2248.
Peck, J. (2005). Struggling with the creative class. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 740–770.
Pittini, A., & Laino, E. (2011). Housing Europe review: The nuts and bolts of European social housing systems. Brussels: Cecodhas Housing Europes’s Observatory.
Priemus, H., & Gruis, V. (2011). Social housing and illegal state aid: The agreement between European Commission and Dutch Government. International Journal of Housing Policy, 11(1), 89–104.
Raad Landelijk Gebied. (2011). Open deuren, dichte deuren: Middeninkomensgroepen op de woningmarkt—een simulatie. The Hague: Raden voor de Leefomgeving en Infrastructuur.
Raco, M. (2008). Key worker housing, welfare reform and the new spatial policy in England. Regional Studies, 42(5), 737–751.
Rijksoverheid (2010). Besluit Beheer Sociale Huursector. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/besluiten/2005/07/01/besluit-beheer-sociale-huursector-bbsh.html. Accessed on July 28, 2014.
Rouwendal, J. (2007). Mortgage interest deductibility and homeownership in the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(4), 369–382.
Schilder, F., & Janssen-Jansen, L. (2012). Amsterdam: A just housing market? Measuring the ‘justness’ of Dutch housing market policy. In: Conference paper for Congress of the European Real Estate Society, Edinburgh.
SCP. (2011). Wonen, wijken & interventies Krachtwijkenbeleid in perspectief. Den Haag: SCP.
Sol, E., & Van der Vos, M. (2012). EU’s SG(E)I ruling and implementation. SGEI: The Casus of Social Housing in the Netherlands. Serie DP-HSI. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. Hugo Sinzheimer Instituut.
Staatsblad (2012). Besluit van 21 December 2012 tot wijziging van het Besluit Gedragstoezicht financiële ondernemingen Wft, het Belsuit marktmisbruik Wft, het Besluit prudentiële regels Wft, alsmede enige andere besluiten op het terrein van de financiële markten (Wijzigingsbelsuit financiële markten 2013). The Hague: Koninkrijk der Nederlanden.
Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal (2013). Kosten Koper: Eindrapport—Een reconstructie van 20 jaar stijgende huizenprijzen. The Hague: Tweede Kamer der Staten Generaal.
Uitermark, J. (2009). An in memoriam for the just city of Amsterdam. City, 13(2–3), 348–361.
Van der Heijden, H., & Haffner, M. E. A. (2000). Housing expenditure and housing policy in the West European rental sector. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 15, 71–92.
Woon Amsterdam. (2013). Woon Amsterdam 2013: Transformatie. Amsterdam: Dienst Belastingen Gemeente Amsterdam, Makelaarsvereniging Amsterdam & Amsterdamse Federatie van Woningcorporaties.
WSW. (2012). Sturen op economische ontwikkelingen: Trentrapportage woningcorporaties 2012. Hilversum: Waarborgfonds Sociale Woningbouw.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jonkman, A., Janssen-Jansen, L. The “squeezed middle” on the Dutch housing market: how and where is it to be found?. J Hous and the Built Environ 30, 509–528 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9420-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-014-9420-7