Abstract
The low level of residential mobility in England, particularly in the social sector, has been a continuing topic both in the literature and among policy makers. The period 1995–2007 was one of relatively rapid tenure change as well as sustained economic growth which could be expected to have increased mobility across tenures but also the costs of immobility in both the labour and housing markets. It was also a period where allocations to the social sector were increasingly concentrated among more vulnerable households. Given these trends does social housing continue to stand out as particularly immobile? If so is the relative immobility an outcome of who lives in social housing rather than how the sector is managed? And do low levels of mobility have significant negative impacts generating labour market inefficiencies and poor use of social housing? This paper uses Survey of English Housing data for the decade of growth from the mid 1990s to examine the drivers of mobility across tenures and how these have changed over the period, with particular emphasis on outcomes in the social sector. These drivers are described and modelled for the study period and suggest that social sector tenants with similar characteristics are much less mobile than households in other tenures but that the costs of this immobility, while difficult to quantify may well be quite limited.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Results reported here come from additional modelling of the HA and local authority sectors separately.
References
Ball, M. (2004). The future of private renting in the UK. London: Social Market Foundation.
Barker, K. (2004). Review of housing supply: Delivering stability: Securing our future housing needs. London: HM Treasury.
Battu, H., Ma, A., & Phimister, E. (2008). Housing tenure, job mobility and unemployment in the UK. Economic Journal, 118, 311–328.
Boyle, P., & Shen, J. (1997). Public housing and migration: A multilevel modelling approach. International Journal of Population Geography, 3, 227–242.
Burrows, R. (1999). Residential mobility and residualisation in social housing in England. Journal of Social Policy, 28(1), 27–52.
Champion, A., Rees, P., Boyle, P., & Stillwell, J. (1998). The determinants of migration flows in England: A review of existing data and evidence. Report prepared for the Department of Environment, Transport and Regions, Department of Geography. Leeds: University of Leeds.
Cho, Y., & Whitehead, C. (2005a). People and places: Mobility aspirations among London households. Open House International, 30(3), 45–53.
Cho, Y., & Whitehead, C. (2005b). Residential mobility of social tenants and households entering Low Cost Home Ownership (LCHO): A comparison of London and the Northern Regions. Data spring Discussion Paper 10, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
Clark, W. A. V., & Dieleman, F. M. (1996). Households and housing: Choice and outcomes in the housing market. Rutgers: Centre for Urban Policy Research, State University of New Jersey.
Crook, A., Whitehead, C., Jones, M., Monk, S., Tang, C., Tunstall, B., et al. (2011). New Affordable Home: What, for whom and where have registered providers been building between 1989–2009?. London: Homes and Communities Agency.
DCLG. (2002). Allocation of accommodation: Guidance for local authorities in England. London: DCLG.
DCLG. (2012). Allocation of accommodation: Guidance for local housing authorities in England. London: DCLG.
Dieleman, F. M. (2001). Modelling residential mobility: A review of recent trends in research. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 16, 249–265.
Dohmen, T. J. (2005). Housing, mobility and unemployment. Regional Science & Urban Economics, 35, 305–325.
DTZ Consulting & Research. (2006). Housing, economic development and productivity: Literature review. Reading: DTZ Consulting & Research.
Flowerdew, R., & Halfacre, K. H. (1994). Logit modelling of migration. In J. C. H. Stillwell & P. Congdon (Eds.), Migration models: Macro and micro approaches (pp. 92–112). London: Belhaven.
Gardner, J., Pierre, G., & Oswald, A. J. (2001). Moving for Job Reasons. UK: Department of Economics, University of Warwick.
Gordon, I. R. (1990). Housing and Labour market constraints on migration across the North-South divide. In J. Ermisch (Ed.), Housing and the national economy. London: Avebury-Gower.
Gordon, I. R., & Molho, I. I. (1998). A multi-stream analysis of the changing pattern of inter-regional migration in Great Britain, 1960–91. Regional Studies, 32, 309–323.
Helderman, A. C., Mulder, C. H., & Ham, M. V. (2004). The changing effect of home ownership on residential mobility in the Netherlands, 1980–1998. Housing Studies, 19(4), 601–616.
Hills, J. (2007). Ends and means: The future roles of social housing in England. CASE report: ESRC Research Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion. 34.
Hughes, G., & McCormick, B. (1981). Do council house policies reduce migration between regions. Economic Journal, 91, 919–937.
Hughes, G., & McCormick, B. (1985). Migration intentions in the UK: Which households want to migrate and which succeed? Economic Journal, 95, 113–123.
Hughes, G., & McCormick, B. (1987). Housing markets, unemployment and labour market flexibility in the UK. European Economic Review, 31, 83–113.
Hughes, G., & McCormick, B. (2000). Housing policy and labour market performance: A review of existing data and evidence. Report prepared for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, University of Edinburgh.
Lui, H., & Suen, W. (2011). The effects of public housing on internal mobility in Hong Kong. Journal of Housing Economics, 20(1), 15–29.
Meen, G., & Andrews, M. (1998). Modelling regional house prices: A review of literature. Report prepared for the Department of Environment, Transport and Regions, Centre for Spatial and Real Estate Economics, University of Reading.
Munro, M., Pawson, H., & Monk, S. (2005). Evaluation of English housing policy 1975–2000: Theme 4: Widening choice. London: Office of Deputy Prime Minister.
Oswald, A. (1996). A conjecture on the explanation for high unemployment in the industrialised nations: Part 1. University of Warwick Economic Research Paper 475.
Oswald, A. (1998). The missing piece of the unemployment puzzle. Paper presented at CEPR/ESRC workshop on Unemployment Dynamics, London, 4 November.
Owen, D., & Green, A. E. (1992). Migration patterns and trends. In T. Champion & T. Fielding (Eds.), Migration processes and patterns, 1: Research progress and prospects (pp. 17–38). London: Belhaven.
Pawson, H. (1998). Gravity defied: Local authority lettings and stock turnover in the 1990s. In S. Wilcox (Ed.), Housing finance review 1998/99. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Pawson, H., & Bramley, G. (2000). Understanding recent trends in residential mobility in council housing in England. Urban Studies, 37(8), 1231–1259.
Whitehead, C. M. E. (1999). Urban housing markets: Theory and policy. In E. S. Miles & P. Cheshire (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Whitehead, C. M. E. (2010). International trends in owner-occupation in the light of the financial crisis. Housing Finance International, (Winter), 6–12.
Whitehead, C., & Scanlon, K. (2008). Social housing in Europe. London: LSE London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, Y., Whitehead, C. The immobility of social tenants: is it true? Does it matter?. J Hous and the Built Environ 28, 705–726 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9331-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9331-4