Skip to main content
Log in

Youth Development Through Mentorship: A Los Angeles School-Based Mentorship Program Among Latino Children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite higher risk for school failure, few school-based mentoring (SBM) studies have focused on low-income at-risk Latino children. We describe the development and evaluation of the Youth Empowerment Program (YEP), a sustainable, high-quality, SBM program among urban Latino students. Based on evidence from work in other communities, YEP was created as a partnership between the 4th and 5th grades at a Los Angeles Title I elementary school and university undergraduates. We tested the feasibility of applying a previously validated relationship quality assessment tool in this population. Since 2008, 61 mentor and mentee pairs have participated in YEP, with an average relationship length of 1.5 years. Through 2010, over 95 % of pairs had relationships lasting at least 1 year, while 47 % lasted 2 or more years. Seventy-percent of mentees and 85 % of mentors were female, and an increased trend for early relationship termination was observed among male mentees. Through 2011, relationships lasted under 1 year among 29 % of male mentees compared to 7 % of female mentees (p = 0.15). A previously validated relationship quality assessment tool was easily incorporated into YEP, with relationships exhibiting youth-centeredness, emotional engagement and low dissatisfaction. After 5 years, YEP has become a feasible and sustainable SBM program providing long-term relationships for low-income Latino children. These relationships may improve youth health through fewer risky behaviors and attitude improvements. Future work should focus on supporting male mentors and mentees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grossman, J., & Rhodes, J. (2002). The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grossman, J., & Bulle, M. (2006). Review of what youth programs do to increase the connectedness of youth with adults. Journal of Adolescent Health, 6, 788–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sipe, C. (2002). Mentoring programs for adolescents: A research summary. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31(6), 251–260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DuBois, D., Holloway, B., Valentine, J., & Cooper, H. (2002). Effectiveness of mentoring programs for youth: A meta-analytic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 157–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rhodes, J., Reddy, R., Roffman, J., & Grossman, J. (2005). Promoting successful youth mentoring relationships: A preliminary screening questionnaire. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 147–167.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rhodes, J., Grossman, J., & Resch, N. (2000). Agents of change: Pathways through which mentoring relationships influence adolescents’ academic adjustment. Child Development, 71(6), 1662–1671.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Herrera, C. (2004). School-based mentoring: A closer look. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Karcher, M. (2008). The study of mentoring in the learning environment (SMILE): A randomized evaluation of the effectiveness of school-based mentoring. Prevention Science, 9(2), 99–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrera, C., Sipe, C., McClanahan, W., Arbreton, A., & Pepper, S. (2000). Mentoring school-age children: Relationship Development in community-based and school-based programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karcher, M., Nakkula, M., & Harris, J. (2005). Developmental mentoring match characteristics: Correspondence between mentors’ and mentees’ assessments of relationship quality. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(2), 93–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman, J., Chan, C., Schwartz, S., & Rhodes, J. (2011). The test of time in school-based mentoring: The role of relationship duration and re-matching on academic outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(2), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shetgiri, R., Kataoka, S., Ryan, G., Askew, L., Chung, P., & Schuster, M. (2009). Risk and resilience in Latinos: A community-based participatory research study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6), S217–S224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jucovy, L. (2002). Measuring the quality of mentor-youth relationships: A tool for mentoring programs. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Office of Data and Accountability, “2010–2011 school accountability report card (SARC),” Los Angeles unified school district, 2011. Online. Available: http://search.lausd.k12.ca.us/cgi-bin/fccgi.exe?w3exec=sarc4&which=6952. Accessed August 13, 2013.

  15. Los Angeles Unified School District, “Data summary sheet,” 2011. Online. Available: http://schoolinfosheet.lausd.net/budgetreports/reports.jsp. Accessed August 13, 2013.

  16. Neighborhood Knowledge California (NKCA), UCLA School of Public Affairs, Online. Available: http://www.spa.ucla.edu/policyforum/default.cfm?page=nkca_info.cfm. Accessed March 18, 2012.

  17. US Census Bureau, “census 2000 block group,” Online. Available: http://www.census.gov/geo/www/cob/bg2000.html. Accessed March 19, 2012.

  18. Cannata, A., Garringer, M., Taylor, J., & Arvalo, E. (2006). Preparing participants for mentoring: The U.S. Department of Education Mentoring Program’s guide to initial training of volunteers, youth, and parents, Encino, CA: Mentor Resource Center.

  19. Jucovy, L. (2001). Training new mentors. Philadelphia, PA: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory’s National Mentoring Center.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bernstein, L., Rappaport, C., Olsho, L., Hunt, D., & Levin, M. (2009). Impact evaluation of the U.S. Department of Education’s student mentoring program. Washington, DC: National Center for Education and Regional Assistance.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Molnar, B., Cerda, M., Roberts, A., & Buka, S. (2008). Effects of neighborhood resources on aggressive and delinquent behaviors among urban youths. American Journal of Public Health, 98(6), 1086–1093.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schwartz, S., Rhodes, J., Chan, C., & Herrera, C. (2011). The impact of school-based mentoring on youths with different relational profiles. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 450–462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herrera, C., Grossman, J., Kauh, T., & McMaken, J. (2011). Mentoring in schools: And impact study of big brothers big sisters school-based mentoring. Child Development, 82(1), 346–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Stoner Avenue Elementary school principals and elementary school teachers whose support is integral to YEP’s existence. We also thank the numerous SCOPE mentors and LAUSD students who have participated in this program. We thank Dr. Rashmi Shetgiri for her help in early program conceptualization. The SCOPE program is partially supported by a federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau Pipeline Grant (T16MC06956, PI = Kuo).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan J. Coller.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Coller, R.J., Kuo, A.A. Youth Development Through Mentorship: A Los Angeles School-Based Mentorship Program Among Latino Children. J Community Health 39, 316–321 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9762-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9762-1

Keywords

Navigation