Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

HIV Diagnoses and Prevalence in the Southern Region of the United States, 2007–2010

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Community Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On a number of leading health indicators, including HIV disease, individuals in the southern states of the United States fare worse than those in other regions. We analyzed data on adults and adolescents diagnosed with HIV infection through December 2010, and reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through June 2011 from 46 states with confidential name-based HIV reporting since January 2007 to describe the impact of HIV in the South. In 2010 46.0 % of all new diagnoses of HIV infection occurred in the South. Compared to other regions, a higher percentage of diagnoses in the South were among women (23.8 %), blacks/African Americans (57.2 %), and among those in the heterosexual contact category (15.0 % for males; 88.5 % for females). From 2007 to 2010 the estimated number and rate of diagnoses of HIV infection decreased significantly in the South overall (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] = −1.5 % [95 %CI −2.3 %, −0.7 %] and −2.1 % [95 % CI −4.0 %, −0.2 %], respectively) and among most groups of women, but there was no change in the number or rate of diagnoses of HIV infection among men overall. Significant decreases in men 30–39 and 40–49 years of age were offset by increases in young men 13–19 and 20–29 years of age. A continued focus on this area of high HIV burden is needed to yield success in the fight against HIV disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. U. S. Census Bureau. (2009). Population estimates: Entire data set. July 1, 2009. Accessed 24 Sep 2010.

  2. Bishaw, A. (2011). Areas with concentrated poverty. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-17.pdf.

  3. Kaiser Family Foundation. (2011). State health facts. Retrieved from http://www.statehealthfacts.org/index.jsp.

  4. United Health Foundation. (2011). America’s health rankings. Retrieved from http://www.americashealthrankings.org/.

  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Racial/ethnic disparities in diagnoses of HIV/AIDS—33 states, 2001–2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 55(05), 121–125.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson, A. S., Hu, X., Sharpe, T. T., & Dean, H. D. (2009). Disparities in HIV/AIDS diagnoses among racial and ethnic minority youth. The Journal of Equity in Health, 2(1), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Linley, L., Prejean, J., An, Q., Chen, M., & Hall, H. I. (2012). Racial/ethnic disparities in HIV diagnoses among persons aged 50 years and older in 37 US states, 2005–2008. American Journal of Public Health, 102(8), 1527–1534. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2011.300431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fleming, P. L., Lansky, A., Lee, L. M., & Nakashima, A. K. (2006). The epidemiology of HIV/AIDS in women in the southern United States. Sexually Transmitted Diseases, 33(7), S32–S38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lieb, S., Prejean, J., Thompson, D. R., Fallon, S. J., Cooper, H., Gates, G. J., et al. (2011). HIV prevalence rates among men who have sex with men in the southern United States: Population-based estimates by race/ethnicity. AIDS and Behavior, 15, 596–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). HIV Surveillance Report, 2010; vol. 22. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/surveillance/resources/reports/2010report/index.htm.

  11. Sutton, M., Anthony, M., Vila, C., McLellan-Lemal, E., & Weidle, P. J. (2010). HIV testing and HIV/AIDS treatment services in rural counties in 10 southern states: Service provider perspectives. The Journal of Rural Health, 26, 240–247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meditz, A. L., MaWhinney, S., Allshouse, A., Feser, W., Markowitz, M., Little, S., et al. (2011). Sex, race, and geographic region influence clinical outcomes following primary HIV-1 infection. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 203, 442–451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Southern State AIDS/STD Directors Work Group. (2003). Southern states manifesto HIV/AIDS and STDs in the south: A call to action! Retrieved from, http://www.vdh.state.va.us/epidemiology/DiseasePrevention/documents/pdf/FinalSouthernManifesto.pdf.

  14. Southern AIDS Coalition. (2008). Southern states manifesto: Update 2008: HIV/AIDS and sexually transmitted diseases in the South. Retrieved from, http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/Sections/NEWS/PDFs/ManifestoUPDATEFINAL071408.source.prod_affiliate.69.pdf.

  15. Reif, S., Whetten, K., Wilson, E., & Gong, W. (2011). HIV/AIDS epidemic in the south reaches crisis proportions in the last decade. Retrieved from, http://globalhealth.duke.edu/news/2011/ResearchReportFinal3-12.pdf.

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2008). Revised surveillance case definitions for HIV infection among adults, adolescents, and children aged < 18 months and for HIV infection and AIDS among children aged 18 months to < 13 years – United States, 2008. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 57(RR-10), 1-12.

  17. Song, R., Hall, H. I., & Frey, R. (2005). Uncertainties associated with incidence estimates of HIV/AIDS diagnoses adjusted for reporting delay and risk redistribution. Statistics in Medicine, 24(3), 453–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. McDavid Harrison, K., Kajese, T., Hall, H. I., & Song, R. (2008). Risk factor redistribution of the national HIV/AIDS surveillance data: An alternative approach. Public Health Reports, 123(5), 618–627.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Office of Management and Budget. Update of statistical area definitions and guidance on their uses. OMB Bulletin 10-02. Retrieved from, http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/bulletins/b10-02.pdf.

  21. Kleinbaum, D. G., Kupper, L. L., & Muller, K. E. (1988). Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods (2nd ed., pp. 266–268). Belmont, CA: PWS-Kent.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Amato, D. (1988). A generalized Kaplan-Meier estimator for heterogeneous populations. Communications in Statistics: Theory Methods, 17, 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hanna, D. B., Selik, R. M., Tang, T., & Gange, S. J. (2012). Disparities among US states in HIV-related mortality in persons with HIV infection, 2001–2007. AIDS, 26, 95–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Prejean, J., Song, R., Hernandez, A., Ziebell, R., Green, T., Walker, F., et al. (2011). Estimated HIV incidence in the United States, 2006–2009. PLoS ONE, 6(8), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Diagnoses of HIV infection and AIDS among adolescents and young adults in the United States and 5 U.S. dependent areas, 2006–2009. HIV Supplemental Surveillance Report, 17(No. 2). Retrieved from, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/surveillance/resources/reports/.

  26. The White House Office of National AIDS Policy. (2010). National HIV/AIDS strategy for the United States. Retrieved from, http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/onap/nhas/.

  27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). HIV prevention in the United States, high-impact prevention: Saving lives and money. Retrieved from, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/strategy/hihp/pdf/dhap_policy_maker.pdf.

  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2012). CDC’S new high-impact approach to HIV prevention funding for health departments: Advancing the National HIV/AIDS Strategy. Retrieved from, http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/funding/PS12-1201/pdf/HD_awards_media_factsheet.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge our partners in state and local health departments for their work in the collection of HIV surveillance data, and R. Luke Shouse, M.D., M.P.H., and Amy Lansky, Ph.D. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provides funding to state and local health departments to conduct surveillance of HIV disease in accordance with their own disease reporting regulations. CDC provides technical guidance for the collection of data by the state and local health departments and data are sent to CDC for national-level analyses. The analysis methods for this manuscript were developed by CDC. CDC makes all decisions regarding the publication of national surveillance data as a means to describe the HIV epidemic. ICF International, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America, employs Tian Tang, M.S., and provided scientific analysis services as directed by CDC through a contract with CDC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph Prejean.

Additional information

The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prejean, J., Tang, T. & Irene Hall, H. HIV Diagnoses and Prevalence in the Southern Region of the United States, 2007–2010. J Community Health 38, 414–426 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9633-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-012-9633-1

Keywords

Navigation