Abstract
Families who face genetic disease risk must learn how to grapple with complicated uncertainties about their health and future on a long-term basis. Women who undergo BRCA 1/2 genetic testing describe uncertainty related to personal risk as well as their loved ones’, particularly daughters’, risk. The genetic counseling setting is a prime opportunity for practitioners to help mothers manage uncertainty in the moment but also once they leave a session. Uncertainty Management Theory (UMT) helps to illuminate the various types of uncertainty women encounter and the important role of communication in uncertainty management. Informed by UMT, we conducted a thematic analysis of 16 genetic counseling sessions between practitioners and mothers at risk for, or carriers of, a BRCA1/2 mutation. Five themes emerged that represent communication strategies used to manage uncertainty: 1) addresses myths, misunderstandings, or misconceptions; 2) introduces uncertainty related to science; 3) encourages information seeking or sharing about family medical history; 4) reaffirms or validates previous behavior or decisions; and 5) minimizes the probability of personal risk or family members’ risk. Findings illustrate the critical role of genetic counseling for families in managing emotionally challenging risk-related uncertainty. The analysis may prove beneficial to not only genetic counseling practice but generations of families at high risk for cancer who must learn strategic approaches to managing a complex web of uncertainty that can challenge them for a lifetime.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aasen, T., & Skolbekken, J. A. (2014). Preparing for and communicating uncertainty in cancer genetic counselling sessions in Norway: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Health, Risk & Society, 16(4), 370–389.
Banning, J. H. (2003). Ecological sentence synthesis. Retrieved from http://mycahs.colostate.edu/James.H.Banning/PDFs/Ecological%20Sentence%20Synthesis.pdf.
Berger, C. R., & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112.
Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., Øyen, N., Havik, O. E., Carlsson, A., & Berglund, G. (2007). Risk perception, worry and satisfaction related to genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 16, 211–222.
Bjorvatn, C., Eide, G. E., Hanestad, B. R., & Havik, O. E. (2008). Anxiety and depression among subjects attending genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Patient Education and Counseling, 71, 234–243.
Borzekowski, D. L., Guan, Y., Smith, K. C., Erby, L. H., & Roter, D. L. (2014). The Angelina effect: Immediate reach, grasp, and impact of going public. Genetics in Medicine, 16(7), 516–521.
Bowen, D. J., Harris, J., Jorgensen, C. M., Myers, M. F., & Kuniyuki, A. (2010). Socioeconomic influences on the effects of a genetic testing direct-to-consumer marketing campaign. Public Health Genomics, 13(3), 131–142.
Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and Uncertainty Management. Journal of Communication, 51(3), 477–497.
Brashers, D. E. (2007). Communication and uncertainty management. In B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 223–241). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., Russell, J. A., Cardillo, L. W., Haas, S. M., Dobbs, L. K., et al. (2003). The medical, personal, and social causes of uncertainty in HIV illness. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 24(5), 497–522.
Brashers, D. E., Neidig, J. L., & Goldsmith, D. J. (2004). Social support and the management of uncertainty for people living with HIV or AIDS. Health Communication, 16(3), 305–331.
Brashers, D. E., Hsieh, E., Neidig, J. L., & Reynolds, N. R. (2006). Managing uncertainty about illness: Health care providers as credible authorities. In Le Poire, B. A., & Dailey, R. M. (Eds.), Applied interpersonal communication matters: Family, health, and community relations, 219–240: New York: Peter Lang.
Bylund, C. L., Fisher, C. L., Brashers, D., Edgerson, S., Glogowski, E. A., Boyar, S. R., & Kissane, D. (2012). Sources of uncertainty about daughters’ breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(2), 292–304.
Clark, S., Bluman, L. G., Borstelmann, N., Regan, K., Winer, E. P., Rimer, B. K., & Skinner, C. S. (2000). Patient motivation, satisfaction, and coping in genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 9(3), 219–235.
Daly, K. J. (2007). Qualitative methods for family studies and human development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Dean, M. (2016). Celebrity health announcements and online health information seeking: an analysis of Angelina Jolie’s preventative health decision. Health Communication, 31, 752–761.
Douglas, H. A., Hamilton, R. J., & Grubs, R. E. (2009). The effect of BRCA gene testing on family relationships: a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 18(5), 418–435.
Eijzenga, W., Hahn, D. E., Aaronson, N. K., Kluijt, I., & Bleiker, E. M. (2014). Specific psychosocial issues of individuals undergoing genetic counseling for cancer–a literature review. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 23(2), 133–146.
Evans, D. G., Barwell, J., Eccles, D. M., Collins, A., Izatt, L., Jacobs, C., et al. (2014). The Angelina Jolie effect: how high celebrity profile can have a major impact on provision of cancer related services. Breast Cancer Research, 16(5), 442–448.
Fisher, C. L. (2010). Coping with breast cancer across adulthood: emotional support communication in the mother-daughter bond. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 386–411.
Fisher, C. L. (2014). Coping together, side by side: Enriching mother-daughter communication across the breast cancer journey. New York: Hampton Press.
Fisher, C. L., Maloney, E., Glogowski, E., Hurley, K., Edgerson, S., Lichtenthal, W. G., & Bylund, C. (2014). Talking about familial breast cancer risk topics and strategies to enhance mother–daughter interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 24(4), 517–535.
Frost, C. J., Venne, V., Cunningham, D., & Gerritsen-McKane, R. (2004). Decision making with uncertain information: learning from women in a high risk breast cancer clinic. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 13(3), 221–236.
Gaff, C. L., Galvin, K. M., & Bylund, C. L. (2010). Facilitating family communication about genetics in practice. In C. L. Gaff & C. L. Bylund (Eds.), Family communication about genetics: theory and practice (pp. 243–272). New York: Oxford University Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
Hallowell, N., Statham, H., Murton, F., Green, J., & Richards, M. (1997). “Talking about chance”: the presentation of risk information during genetic counseling for breast and ovarian cancer. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6(3), 269–286.
Jolie, A. (2013). My medical choice. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html.
Jolie Pitt, A. (2015). Angelina Jolie Pitt: Diary of a surgery. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/opinion/angelina-jolie-pitt-diary-of-a-surgery.html.
Juthe, R. H., Zaharchuk, A., & Wang, C. (2014). Celebrity disclosures and information seeking: the case of Angelina Jolie. Genetics in Medicine, 17(7), 545–553.
Ladouceur, R., Gosselin, P., & Dugas, M. J. (2000). Experimental manipulation of intolerance of uncertainty: a study of a theoretical model of worry. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(9), 933–941.
Lupton, D. (1994). Toward the development of critical health communication praxis. Health Communication, 6(1), 55–67.
Maloney, E., Edgerson, S., Robson, M., Offit, K., Brown, R., Bylund, C., & Kissane, D. W. (2012). What women with breast cancer discuss with clinicians about risk for their adolescent daughters. Journal of Psychosocial Pncology, 30(4), 484–502.
Mouchawar, J., Hensley-Alford, S., Laurion, S., Ellis, J., Kulchak-Rahm, A., Finucane, M. L., & Ritzwoller, D. (2005). Impact of direct-to-consumer advertising for hereditary breast cancer testing on genetic services at a managed careorganization: a naturally-occurring experiment. Genetics in Medicine, 7, 191–197.
Owen, W. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(3), 274–287.
Peterson, S. K. (2005). The role of the family in genetic testing: theoretical perspectives, current knowledge, and future directions. Health Education & Behavior, 32(5), 627–639.
Rosen, N. O., & Knäuper, B. (2009). A little uncertainty goes a long way: state and trait differences in uncertainty interact to increase information seeking but also increase worry. Health Communication, 24(3), 228–238.
Roter, D. L., Erby, L. H., Larson, S., & Ellington, L. (2007). Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: preliminary test of a conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine, 65(7), 1442–1457.
Sachs, L., Taube, A., & Tishelman, C. (2001). Risk in numbers – Difficulties in the transformation of genetic knowledge from research to people: The case of hereditary cancer. Acta Oncologica, 40(4), 445–453. doi:10.1080/02841860119276.
Sandelowski, M., & Leeman, J. (2012). Writing usable qualitative health research findings. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1404–1413. doi:10.1177/1049732312450368.
Segal, J., Esplen, M. J., Toner, B., Baedorf, S., Narod, S., & Butler, K. (2004). An investigation of the disclosure process and support needs of BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 125A(3), 267–272. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.20485.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.
Sussner, K. M., Edwards, T., Villagra, C., Rodriguez, M. C., Thompson, H. S., Jandorf, L., & Valdimarsdottir, H. B. (2015). BRCA genetic counseling among at-risk Latinas in New York City: New beliefs shape new generation. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 24, 134–148.
Tercyak, K. P., Peshkin, B. N., Streisand, R., & Lerman, C. (2001). Psychological issues among children of hereditary breast cancer gene (BRCA1/2) testing participants. Psycho-Oncology, 10(4), 336–346.
Thompson, S., & O’Hair, H. D. (2008). Advice-giving and the management of uncertainty for cancer survivors. Health Communication, 23(4), 340–348.
Vanderpool, R. C., & Huang, B. (2010). Cancer risk perceptions, beliefs, and physician avoidance in Appalachia: results from the 2008 HINTS Survey. Journal of Health Communication, 15(sup3), 78–91.
Wideroff, L., Vadaparampil, S. T., Breen, N., Croyle, R. T., & Freedman, A. N. (2003). Awareness of genetic testing for increased cancer risk in the year 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Community Genetics, 6(3), 147–156.
Acknowledgments
This study was funded by Oki-Data Americas. The authors dedicate this study in memory of Dale Brashers, Ph.D. and Margaret Mary Roccotagliata.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
Authors Carla L. Fisher, PhD, Thomas Roccotagliata, MA, Camella J. Rising, MS, RDN, David W. Kissane, MD, Emily A. Glogowski, MS, MSc, and Carma L. Bylund, PhD declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human Studies and Informed Consent
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fisher, C.L., Roccotagliata, T., Rising, C.J. et al. “I Don’t Want to Be an Ostrich”: Managing Mothers’ Uncertainty during BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling. J Genet Counsel 26, 455–468 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9998-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-016-9998-x