Skip to main content
Log in

Cost Sharing and Hereditary Cancer Risk: Predictors of Willingness-to-Pay for Genetic Testing

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Genetic Counseling

Abstract

Increasing use of predictive genetic testing to gauge hereditary cancer risk has been paralleled by rising cost-sharing practices. Little is known about how demographic and psychosocial factors may influence individuals’ willingness-to-pay for genetic testing. The Gastrointestinal Tumor Risk Assessment Program Registry includes individuals presenting for genetic risk assessment based on personal/family cancer history. Participants complete a baseline survey assessing cancer history and psychosocial items. Willingness-to-pay items include intention for: genetic testing only if paid by insurance; testing with self-pay; and amount willing-to-pay ($25–$2,000). Multivariable models examined predictors of willingness-to-pay out-of-pocket (versus only if paid by insurance) and willingness-to-pay a smaller versus larger sum (≤$200 vs. ≥$500). All statistical tests are two-sided (α = 0.05). Of 385 evaluable participants, a minority (42 %) had a personal cancer history, while 56 % had ≥1 first-degree relative with colorectal cancer. Overall, 21.3 % were willing to have testing only if paid by insurance, and 78.7 % were willing-to-pay. Predictors of willingness-to-pay were: 1) concern for positive result; 2) confidence to control cancer risk; 3) fewer perceived barriers to colorectal cancer screening; 4) benefit of testing to guide screening (all p < 0.05). Subjects willing-to-pay a higher amount were male, more educated, had greater cancer worry, fewer relatives with colorectal cancer, and more positive attitudes toward genetic testing (all p < 0.05). Individuals seeking risk assessment are willing-to-pay out-of-pocket for genetic testing, and anticipate benefits to reducing cancer risk. Identifying factors associated with willingness-to-pay for genetic services is increasingly important as testing is integrated into routine cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 1–10.

  • Andersen, M. R., Smith, R., Meischke, H., Bowen, D., & Urban, N. (2003). Breast cancer worry and mammography use by women with and without a family history in a population-based sample. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 12(4), 314–320.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou, A., Pharoah, P., Narod, S., Risch, H. A., Eyfjord, J. E., Hopper, J., & Borg, Å. (2003). Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with <i> BRCA1</i> or <i> BRCA2</i> mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 72(5), 1117–1130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Azjen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. K. J. Beckman (Ed.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosompra, K., Flynn, B. S., Ashikaga, T., Rairikar, C. J., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2000). Likelihood of undergoing genetic testing for cancer risk: a population-based study. Preventive Medicine, 30(2), 155–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosompra, K., Ashikaga, T., Flynn, B. S., Worden, J. K., & Solomon, L. J. (2001). Psychosocial factors associated with the public’s willingness to pay for genetic testing for cancer risk: a structural equations model. Health Education Research, 16(2), 157–172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottorff, J. L., Ratner, P. A., Balneaves, L. G., Richardson, C. G., McCullum, M., Hack, T., & Buxton, J. (2002). Women’s interest in genetic testing for breast cancer risk the influence of sociodemographics and knowledge. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 11(1), 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burak, L. J., & Meyer, M. (1997). Using the health belief model to examine and predict college women’s cervical cancer screening beliefs and behavior. Health Care for Women International, 18(3), 251–262.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burn, J., Gerdes, A.-M., Macrae, F., Mecklin, J.-P., Moeslein, G., Olschwang, S., . . . Bertario, L. (2011). Long-term effect of aspirin on cancer risk in carriers of hereditary colorectal cancer: an analysis from the CAPP2 randomised controlled trial. The Lancet.

  • Chaliki, H., Loader, S., Levenkron, J. C., Logan-Young, W., Hall, W. J., & Rowley, P. (1995). Women’s receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer. American Journal of Public Health, 85(8_Pt_1), 1133–1135.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chikhaoui, Y., Gélinas, H., Joseph, L., & Lance, J.-M. (2002). Cost-minimization analysis of genetic testing versus clinical screening of at-risk relatives for familial adenomatous polyposis. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 18(1), 67–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, E., Stopfer, J. E., Burlingame, E., Evans, K. G., Nathanson, K. L., Weber, B. L., & Domchek, S. M. (2008). Factors determining dissemination of results and uptake of genetic testing in families with known BRCA1/2 mutations. Genetic Testing, 12(1), 81–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K., Peshkin, B., Luta, G., Tuong, W., & Schwartz, M. (2011). Interest in genetic testing for modest changes in breast cancer risk: implications for SNP testing. Public Health Genomics, 14(3), 178–189.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gudgeon, J. M., Williams, J. L., Burt, R. W., Samowitz, W. S., Snow, G. L., & Williams, M. S. (2011). Lynch syndrome screening implementation: business analysis by a healthcare system. The American Journal of Managed Care, 17(8), e288–e300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, K. L., Murphy, J. A., Kaufman, D. J., Javitt, G. H., Katsanis, S. H., & Scott, J. (2006). Oversight of US genetic testing laboratories. Nature Biotechnology, 24(9), 1083–1090.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, P. B., Valdimarsdottier, H., Brown, K. L., & Offit, K. (1997). Decision-making about genetic testing among women at familial risk for breast cancer. Psychosomatic Medicine, 59(5), 459–466.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Japsen, B. (2013, October 17, 2013). In 2014, workers’ share of health costs nearly $5,000 at large companies. Retrieved November 11, 2013, 2013, from http://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2013/10/17/in-2014-workers-share-of-health-costs-nearly-5000-at-large-companies/.

  • Järvinen, H. J., Renkonen-Sinisalo, L., Aktán-Collán, K., Peltomäki, P., Aaltonen, L. A., & Mecklin, J.-P. (2009). Ten years after mutation testing for Lynch syndrome: cancer incidence and outcome in mutation-positive and mutation-negative family members. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(28), 4793–4797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • King, M.-C., Marks, J. H., & Mandell, J. B. (2003). Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science, 302(5645), 643–646.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Daly, M., Masny, A., & Balshem, A. (1994). Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 12(4), 843–850.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Seay, J., Balshem, A., & Audrain, J. (1995). Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 57(3), 385–392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Schwartz, M. D., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., Sands, C., & Rimer, B. K. (1996). A randomized trial of breast cancer risk counseling: Interacting effects of counseling, educational level, and coping style. Health Psychology, 15(2), 75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, C., Kerner, J., Gomez-Caminero, A., Hughes, C., Reed, M. M., Biesecker, B., & Benkendorf, J. L. (1997). Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(2), 148–157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H. (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 119–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., Safer, M. A., & Panagis, D. M. (1983). The impact of communications on the self-regulation of health beliefs, decisions, and behavior. Health Education & Behavior, 10(1), 3–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mavaddat, N., Peock, S., Frost, D., Ellis, S., Platte, R., Fineberg, E., & Easton, D. F. (2013). Cancer risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from prospective analysis of EMBRACE. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105(11), 812–822. doi:10.1093/jnci/djt095.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mecklin, J. P., Aarnio, M., Läärä, E., Kairaluoma, M. V., Pylvänäinen, K., Peltomäki, P., & Järvinen, H. J. (2007). Development of colorectal tumors in colonoscopic surveillance in Lynch syndrome. Gastroenterology, 133(4), 1093–1098.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. M., & Champion, V. L. (1997). Attitudes about breast cancer and mammography: racial, income, and educational differences. Women & Health, 26(1), 41–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Patenaude, A. F., Dorval, M., DiGianni, L. S., Schneider, K. A., Chittenden, A., & Garber, J. E. (2006). Sharing BRCA1/2 test results with first-degree relatives: factors predicting who women tell. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 24(4), 700–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, A., Chandrasekharan, S., & Cook-Deegan, R. (2010). Spinocerebellar ataxia: patient and health professional perspectives on whether and how patents affect access to clinical genetic testing. Genetics in Medicine, 12, S83–S110.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock, I. (1990). The health belief model: explaining health behavior through expectancies. In F. Lewis, K. Glanz, & B. K. Rimer (Eds.), Health behavior and health education theory research and practice (pp. 39–61). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, M. D., Lerman, C., Miller, S. M., Daly, M., & Masny, A. (1995). Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Health Psychology, 14(3), 232.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., & Clarke, V. (1998). Colorectal cancer: a survey of community beliefs and behaviours in Victoria. The Medical Journal of Australia, 169(1), 37.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, N., Anderson, G., & Peacock, S. (1994). Mammography screening: how important is cost as a barrier to use? American Journal of Public Health, 84(1), 50–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, S. W. (1997). Participation in colorectal cancer screening: a review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 89(19), 1406–1422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Kuppermann, M., Kim, B., Phillips, K. A., & Ladabaum, U. (2012a). Influence of patient preferences on the cost-effectiveness of screening for lynch syndrome. Journal of Oncology Practice, 8(3S), e24s–e30s.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, V. W., Koh, P. K., Chow, W. L., & Lim, J. F. Y. (2012b). Predictive genetic testing of first degree relatives of mutation carriers is a cost-effective strategy in preventing hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer in Singapore. Familial Cancer, 11(2), 279–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, M., Dancyger, C., & Michie, S. (2010). Communicating genetic risk information within families: a review. Familial Cancer, 9(4), 691–703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Y.-N., Hamilton, O., Egleston, B., Salador, K., Murphy, C., & Meropol, N. J. (2010). Understanding how out-of-pocket expenses, treatment value, and patient characteristics influence treatment choices. The Oncologist, 15(6), 566–576.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, K. Y., Caughey, A. B., Little, S. E., Cheung, M. K., & Chen, L.-M. (2011). A cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic surgery versus gynecologic surveillance for women from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) Families. Familial Cancer, 10(3), 535–543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Fox Chase Cancer Center Core Grant (P30-006927-45). Dr. Hall is a recipient of a Mentored Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society (MRSG-07-232-01-CPHPS).

Conflicts of Interest

Jennifer M. Matro, Karen J. Ruth, Yu-Ning Wong, Katen C. McCully, Christina M. Rybak, Neal J. Meropol and Michael J. Hall declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 and 2008. Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Human and Animal Rights

No animal or human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Matro.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Table 1

(DOCX 16 kb)

Supplemental Table 2

(DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matro, J.M., Ruth, K.J., Wong, YN. et al. Cost Sharing and Hereditary Cancer Risk: Predictors of Willingness-to-Pay for Genetic Testing. J Genet Counsel 23, 1002–1011 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9724-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9724-5

Keywords

Navigation