Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Exploratory Study of Honor Crimes in the United States

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a lack of research on honor crimes within the United States. We used an open source search methodology to identify the victim-offender relationship and motivations for this crime within the United States. Using data collected based on the protocol for the United States Extremist Crime Database (ECDB), we identified a total of 16 honor crimes with 40 victims that occurred between January 1st 1990 and December 31st 2014 in the United States. Based on our findings, the overarching motivations for honor crimes in the United States were the perpetrator’s former partner beginning the process of separation and the westernized behavior of the victim, typically the offender’s daughter or step-daughter. Honor crimes were not limited to current/former intimate partners or daughters, as they also included the death of extended family members (e.g. in-laws, nieces, and cousins). Policy implications and directions for future research on honor crimes are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Freilich et al. (2014) provide an appendix that lists these sources. For a detailed discussion of the incident identification process, see Chermak et al. (2012), Freilich et al. (2014); Gruenewald (2011), and Gruenewald & Pridemore (2012).

  2. We recently looked at 10 sources (such as the FBI, the Anti-Defamation League, etc.) that the ECDB had used to identify homicides committed by far-right extremists in the United States between 1990 and 2010 (Chermak et al. 2012). After examining these sources similarities and differences, we normalized their inclusion criteria to accurately assess variations in the events they included. We used a “catchment-re-catchment” analysis and found that the inclusion of additional sources resulted in an increasing number of events that were identified in previous sources. Further, the ECDB’s use of key word searches identified over 10 cases that should have been included but yet were missed by all the other sources. Thus, the ECDB’s strategy of using multiple sources- and ideally all relevant sources- to identify the cases interested in minimized the danger of selectivity bias and resulted in a more complete universe.

  3. These web-engines include: 1. Lexis-Nexis; 2. Proquest; 3. Yahoo; 4. Google; 5. Copernic; 6. News Library;7. Westlaw; 8. Google Scholar (both articles & legal opinions); 9. Amazon; 10. Google U.S. Government;11. Federation of American Scientists; 12. Google Video; 13. Center for the Study of Intelligence; 14. Surf Wax;15. Dogpile; 16. Mamma; 17. Librarians’ Internet Index; 18. Scirus; 19. All the Web; 20. Google News; 21. Google Blog; 22. Homeland Security Digital Library; 23. Vinelink; 24. The inmate locator; 25. Bureau of Prisons; 26. Individual State Department of Corrections (DOCs); 27. Blackbookonline.info; 28. Quantloos; 29. Anti-Defamation League; 30. Southern Poverty Law Center; and 31. Center on Law and Security

  4. Freilich et al. (2014) explained how the larger ECDB study that relies upon multiple coders addressed inter-rater reliability. They write that “we addressed this important issue in a number of ways. First, coders were trained. New coders initially coded previously coded cases and both sets of values were compared. We created a listserv of ECDB personnel and instructed coders to share difficult issues. In this way, inconsistencies were addressed early in the coding process. Second, coding abnormalities were continually checked across coders. Third, filling in values for certain ECDB variables required little interpretation as the variables captured basic facts such as a suspect’s race, age, or gender….. we [also] conducted an initial measurement of inter-rater reliability for selected individual and situational characteristics of far-right homicides and found coder agreement between 89 % and 98 % of the time. When coders disagreed it was usually not because of differences in the values coded, but because one coder found a document that contained information that could be coded, while the second coder did not find it (p. 374–375).” Importantly, as noted, we conducted multiple open source searches of each of our 16 honor killings to insure that we did not miss important information. In addition, all the authors participated in the training of coders, and all the points noted in this footnote.

  5. Databases that were searched included state, local, and federal inmate locators; online local court dockets; the social security death index; and online national record aggregators such as Ancestry.com, Archives.com, BeenVerified.com and other news aggregates. If the case was missing the victim’s date of birth for instance, in Google the coder would search “Victim’s Name” and “date of birth” to find information on the missing values.

  6. All web-engines were searched using key terms such as “dowry murders” “Indian honor crime” and “Indian honor killing” in conjunction with “United States”.

  7. For a more detailed description of the coding of variables, see Freilich et al. (2014). All coding is conducted in an Access database.

References

  • AHA Foundation. (2012). What is honor violence?. Retrieved from http://theahafoundation.org/issues/honor-violence/.

  • Anderson, R. R., Seibert, R. F., & Wagner, J. G. (1998). Politics and changes in the middle east. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Araji, S. K., & Carlson, J. (2001). Family violence including crimes of honor in Jordan: Correlates and perceptions of seriousness. Violence Against Women, 7(5), 586–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 651–680.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, N. V., Gregware, P. R., & Cassidy, M. A. (1999). Family killing fields: Honor rationales in the murder of women. Violence Against Women, 5(2), 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barner, J. R., & Carney, M. M. (2011). Interventions for intimate partner violence: A historical review. Journal of Family Violence, 26(3), 235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrouquere, B. (2006). Family fled Somali violence, now children are dead and father is charged with murder. Associated Press Worldstream.. Retreived from. http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2006Oct14/0,4670,ChildrenDead,00.html.

  • Bates, D. G., & Rassam, A. (1983). People and cultures of the middle east. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, C. R., McFarlane, J. M., Walker, G. R., & Devitt, C. O. (1999). Beyond public records: Databases field strategies for locating and interviewing proxy respondents in homicide research. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, K. (2003). When men murder women: An analysis of 2001 homicide data. Washington, DC: Violence Policy Center Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, A. (2009, Feb. 17). Beheaded women’s sister: I might have heard deadly confrontation. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/16/buffalo.beheading/index.html.

  • Brownridge, D. A. (2006). Violence against women post-separation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(5), 514–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunswick, D., & Collins, L. (2009, Feb. 16). Founder of Islamic TV station accused of beheading wife. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/02/16/buffalo.beheading/index.html.

  • Burman, J. (2002). Suspect arrested at border; Jersey City man wanted in murder of 3 women tried to slip into Canada. Hamilton Spectator.

  • Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., Koziol-McLain, J., Block, C. R., Campbell, D., Curry, M. A., et al. (2003). Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. NIJ Journal, 250, 14–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. E. (1984). Causes and maintenance of domestic violence: An ecological analysis. Social Service Review, 58(4), 569–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermak, S. (1995). Victims in the news: Crime and the American news media. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chermak, Steven. (2002). Searching for a demon: The media construction of the militia movement. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

  • Chermak, S., Freilich, J. D., Parkin, W. S., & Lynch, J. (2012). American terrorism and extremist crime data sources and selectivity bias: An investigation focusing on homicide events committed by far-right extremists. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(1), 191–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chermak, S. M., & Gruenewald, J. (2006). The media’s coverage of domestic terrorism. Justice Quarterly, 23(4), 428–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesler, P. (2010). Worldwide trends in honor killings. Middle East Quarterly, XVII(2), 3–11.

  • Chicago Tribune. (2011). Man sentenced to life for killing 5 family members: Prosecutors say he was angry they wouldn’t convert to Islam. Chicago Tribune.

  • CNN. (2008). Dad charged with murdering reluctant bride. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2008/CRIME/07/08/honor.killing/.

  • Coomaraswamy, R. (2005). Violence against women and ‘crimes of honour’. In L. Welchman, & S. Hossai (Eds.), ‘Honour’: Crimes, paradigms, and violence against women (pp. xi–xiv). New York, NY: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, M. (2014). Death by family: Honor violence as punishment. Punishment & Society, 16(4), 406–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeKeseredy, W. S. (2011). Feminist contributions to understanding woman abuse: Myths, controversies, and realities. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16(4), 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, R. (2011). Is honor killing a “Muslim phenomenon”? Textual interpretations and cultural representations. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 31(3), 423–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, R. (2014a). The profiles of victims, perpetrators, and unfounded beliefs in honor killings in Turkey. Homicide Studies, 18(4), 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, R. (2014b). Different cultural understandings of honor that inspire killing: An inquiry into the defendant’s perspective. Homicide Studies, 18(4), 363–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doğan, R. (2014c). The dynamics of honor killings and the perpetrators’ experiences. Homicide Studies, Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1088767914563389

  • Douglas, U., Bathrick, D., & Perry, P. A. (2008). Deconstructing male violence against women: The men stopping violence community-accountability model. Violence Against Women, 14(2), 247–261.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, Z. R. (2009). 3 dead, 1 critical in Roslyn heights apparent murder-suicide. Newsday.

  • Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisner, M., & Ghuneim, L. (2013). Honor killing attitudes among adolescents in Amman, Jordan. Aggressive Behavior, 39(5), 405–417.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freilich, J. D., Chermak, S. M., Belli, R., Gruenewald, J., & Parkin, W. S. (2014). Introducing the United States extremist crime database (ECDB). Terrorism and Political Violence, 26(2), 372–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A. (2005). Uniform crime reports [United States]: supplementary homicide reports, 1976–2002 [computer file] (ICPSR ed., ). Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Moreno, C., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M., Heise, L., & Watts, C. H. (2006). Prevalence of intimate partner violence: Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. The Lancet, 368(9543), 1260–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. (2009). Honor killings and the quest for justice in black and minority ethnic communities in the United Kingdom. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 20(4), 475–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. (2008). ‘Crimes of honor’ and violence against women in the UK. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 32(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, A. K., Begikhani, N., & Hague, G. (2012). ‘Honour’- based violence in kurdish communities. Women's Studies International Forum, 35, 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, I. M., & Abu Ras, W. (1994). On aggression, human rights, and hegemonic discourse: The case of a murder for family honor in Israel. Sex Roles, 30(3/4), 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. T., Shackelford, T. K., Romero, G. A., Kaighobadi, F., & Miner, E. J. (2008). Punishment, proprietariness and paternity: Men’s violence against women from an evolutionary perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13(6), 481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, J. (2011). A comparative examiniation of homicide perpetrated by far-right extremists. Homicide Studies, 15(2), 177–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, J., Chermak, S., & Pizzaro, J. (2013). Covering victims in the news: What makes minority homicides newsworthy? Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 755–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, J., Pizarro, J., & Chermak, S. (2009). Evaluating the newsworthiness of homicide incidents. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36(3), 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, J., & Pridemore, W. (2012). A comparison of ideologically-motivated homicides from the next extremist crime database and homicides from the supplementary homicide reports using multiple imputation by chained equations to handle missing values. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(1), 141–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2005). Male versus female intimate partner violence: Putting controversial findings into context. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1120–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Bates, L., Smutzler, N., & Sandin, E. (1997a). A brief review of the research on husband violence part I: Maritally violent versus nonviolent men. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2(1), 65–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Bates, L. (1997b). A brief review of the research on husband violence part III: Sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and differing consequences of husband and wife violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2(3), 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, P. G., Johnston, J. R., Crooks, C. V., & Bala, N. (2008). Custody disputes involving allegations of domestic violence: Toward a differentiated approach to parenting plans. Family Court Review, 46(3), 500–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(2), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(4), 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropko, M. R. (1999, Jun. 8). Prosecutor’s description of ‘honor killing’ offends Arab-Americans. The Associated Press State & Local Wire.

  • Kulwicki, A. D. (2002). The practice of honor crimes: A glimpse of domestic violence in the Arab world. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 23(1), 77–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kulwicki, A., Aswad, B., Carmona, T., & Ballout, S. (2010). Barriers in the utilization of domestic violence services among Arab immigrant women: Perceptions of professionals, service providers & community leaders. Journal of Family Violence, 25(8), 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulczycki, A., & Windle, S. (2011). Honor killings in the middle east and north Africa: A systematic review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 17(11), 1442–1464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortner, S. B. (1978). The virgin and the state. Feminist Studies, 4, 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, W. S. (2012). Developing theoretical propositions of far-right ideological victimization (unpublished doctoral dissertation). graduate center and john jay college. New York: City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkin, W. S., & Freilich, J. D. (2015). Routine activities and right-wing extremists: An empirical comparison of the victims of ideologically and non-ideologically motivated homicides committed by American far-rightists. Terrorism and Political Violence, 27(1), 182–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pipes, D. (2009). Muslim accused of beheading wife appears in court. Religion News Blog. Retrieved from http://www.religionnewsblog.com/23300/muslim-who-beheaded-wife-appears-in-court.

  • Raj, A., & Silverman, J. (2002). Violence against immigrant women: The roles of culture, context and legal immigrant status on intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 8(3), 367–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sageman, M. (2004). Understanding terror networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D. G. (2002). Are physical assaults by wives and girlfriends a major social problem?: a review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 8(12), 1424–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoetz, D. (2008). Daughter rejects marriage, ends up dead. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=5322587&page=1.

  • Sen, P. (2005). ‘Crimes of honour’, value and meaning. In L. Welchman, & S. Hossai (Eds.), ‘Honour’: Crimes, paradigms, and violence against women (pp. 42–63). New York, NY: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sev’er, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change: A feminist analysis of honor killings in rural Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7(9), 964–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, A. (2001). The devil you know: Continuing problems with research on terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 13(4), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokoloff, N. J. (2008). Expanding the intersectional paradigm to better understand domestic violence in immigrant communities. Critical Criminology, 16(4), 229–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standish, K. (2013). Understanding cultural violence and gender: Honour killings; dowry murder; the Zina ordinance and blood-feuds. Journal of Gender Studies, 23(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: The entrapment of women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöckl, H., Devries, K., Rotstein, A., Abrahams, N., Campbell, J., Watts, C., & Moreno, C. G. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner homicide: A systematic review. The Lancet, 382(9895), 859–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The conflict tactics (CT) scales. Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straus, M. (1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. Gelles, & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies on family violence (pp. 67–88). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uskel, A. K., Cross, S. E., Sunbay, Z., Gercek-Swing, B., & Ataca, B. (2012). Honor bound: The cultural construction of honor in Turkey and the northern United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(7), 1131–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA (United Nations Population Fund) (2000). The state of the world population. Retrieved from http://www.unfpa.org/swp/2000/english/index.html.

  • Vandello, J. A., & Cohen, D. (2003). Male honor and female fidelity: Implicit cultural scripts that perpetuate domestic violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 997–1010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Welchman, L., & Hossain, S. (Eds.) (2005). “Honourcrimes, paradigms, and violence against women. London: Zed Press.

  • Wiken, U. (2008). In honor of fadime: Murder and shame. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka, M., & Choi, D. (2005). Culture and interpersonal violence research: Paradigm shift to create a full continuum of domestic violence services. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(4), 513–519.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brittany E. Hayes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hayes, B.E., Freilich, J.D. & Chermak, S.M. An Exploratory Study of Honor Crimes in the United States. J Fam Viol 31, 303–314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9801-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-016-9801-7

Keywords

Navigation