Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the temperature distribution in the explosion of a methane/air mixture in a tunnel

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics Aims and scope

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

The aim of this work is to investigate temperature distribution in methane/air mixture explosion near a wall of a tunnel by numerical simulation. The results obtained on the basis of the hypothesis of an adiabatic wall are compared with those for a nonadiabatic wall. It is shown that the temperature near the wall in explosion of methane/air mixtures in tunnels changes abruptly. The hypothesis of an adiabatic wall leads to a great error in the calculated temperature near the wall. If heat conduction in the wall is ignored, the temperatures at various locations of a section are almost equal, whereas the measured temperatures on the vessel wall are always lower than those calculated on the basis of the hypothesis mentioned. However, when it is necessary to find the temperatures in the field outside the range near the wall, heat conduction in it can be ignored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. L. Cashdollar, I. A. Zlochower, and G. M. Green, Flammability of methane, propane, and hydrogen gases, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 13, 327–340 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. N. Gascoin and P. Gillard, Confined kerosene vapor explosion: severity prediction laws based on numerical simulations, Energy Fuels, 24, 404–418 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Daniau, M. Bouchez, O. Herbinet, P.-M. Marquaire, N. Gascoin, and P. Gillard, Fuel reforming for scramjet thermal management and combustion optimization, in: A Collection Tech. Papers13th AIAA/CIRA Int. Space Planes Hypersonic Syst. Technol. Conf. 3 (2005), pp. 1799–1807.

  4. O. Kalejaiye, P. R. Amyotte, M. J. Pegg, and K. L. Cashdollar., Effectiveness of dust dispersion in the 20-L Siwek chamber, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 23, 46–59 (2010).

  5. D. B. Mercer, P. R. Amyotte, D. J. Dupuis, M. J. Pegg, A. E. Dahoe, W. B. C. de Heij, J. F. Zevenbergen, and B. Scarlett, The influence of injector design on the decay of pre-ignition turbulence in a spherical explosion chamber, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 14, 269–282 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Chawla, P. R. Amyotte, and M. J. Pegg, A comparison of experimental methods to determine the minimum explosible concentration of dusts, Fuel, 75, 654–658 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Kobiera, J. Kindracki, P. Zydak, and P. Wolanski, A new phenomenological model of gas explosion based on characteristics of flame surface, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 20, 271–280 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Wolanski, C. W. Kauffman, M. Sichel, and J. A. Nicholls, Detonation of methane–air mixtures, in: Proc. 18th Symp. Int. Combust. (1981), pp. 1651–1660.

  9. A. E. Dahoe, Laminar burning velocities of hydrogen–air mixtures from closed vessel gas explosions, J. Loss. Prev. Process Ind., 18, 152–166 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. E. Dahoe and P. H. Goey, On the determination of the laminar burning velocity from closed vessel gas explosions, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 16, 457–478 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. E. Dahoe, R. S. Cant, and B. Scarlett, On the decay of turbulence in the 20-liter explosion sphere, Flow Turbul. Combust., 67, 159–184 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. E. Dahoe, R. S. Cant, M. J. Pegg, and B. Scarlett, On the transient flow in the 20-liter explosion sphere, J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., 14, 475–487 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. C. L. Tang, Z. H. Huang, C. Jin, J. He, J. Wang, X. Wang, and H. Miao, Explosion characteristics of hydrogen–nitrogen–air mixtures at elevated pressures and temperatures, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 34, 554–561 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Q. Zhang, W. Li, D.-C. Lin, Y. Duan, and H.-M. Liang, Experimental study of gas deflagration temperature distribution and its measurement, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 35, 503–508 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Z. Xiao, Z. W. Song, and F. Zhang, Experimental study on the coefficient of thermal conductivity for concrete and analysis, J. Constr. Mater. [in Chinese], 13, 17–21 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. P. Sun, Y. S. Yuan, J. H. Jiang, and J. Y. Cheng, Experimental study on the change rule of coefficient for concrete, Concrete [in Chinese], No. 5, 59–61 (2009).

  17. D. M. Jiang, Combustion in Engine [in Chinese], Xi’an Jiao Tong Univ. Press, Xi’an (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Zhang.

Additional information

Published in Inzhenerno-Fizicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 85, No. 6, pp. 1307–1311, November–December, 2012.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Q., Pang, L. Analysis of the temperature distribution in the explosion of a methane/air mixture in a tunnel. J Eng Phys Thermophy 85, 1413–1418 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-012-0790-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-012-0790-y

Keywords

Navigation