Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of the solid–liquid bubble interface in partial nucleate boiling

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Physics and Thermophysics Aims and scope

Several models of heat transfer in partial nucleate boiling are identified in order to determine the relationship between the dominant physical parameters. The correlations are different for different models, so the main goal of this analysis is to determine the validity of each model and to identify the most dominant physical phenomenon in the nucleate boiling heat transfer. This is done by comparing the results of different models with a vast range of reliable experimental data. The comparison shows that the Sakashita and Kumada model gives the best results in the nucleate boiling heat transfer. It is also shown that the most dominating phenomenon in isolated partial bubbles zones is the transient conduction taking place mainly under the bubbles. This is in contradiction with a majority of the models that consider convection as the most important mode in the nucleate boiling heat transfer. The selected model can also be extrapolated and used in the case of fully developed bubbles zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. L. Tien, A hydrodynamic model for nucleate pool boiling, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 5, 533–540 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Nishikawa and K. Yamagata, On the correlation of nucleate boiling heat transfer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 1, 219–235 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Hara, The mechanism of nucleate boiling heat transfer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 6, 959–969 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. I. L. Pioro, W. Rohsenow, and S. S. Doerffer, Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer–I. Review of parametric effects of boiling surface, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, 5033–5044 (2004).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Kurihara and J. E. Myers, The effects of superheat and surface roughness on boiling coefficients, AIChE J., 6, 83–91 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Kocamustafaogullari and M. Ishii, Interfacial area and nucleation site density in boiling system, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 26, 1377–1387 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Kumada and H. Sakashita, Pool boiling heat transfer–II. Thickness of liquid macrolayer formed beneath vapor masses, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 38, 979–987 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Iida and K. Kobayashi, An experimental investigation on the mechanism of pool boiling phenomena by probe method, in: Proc. 4th Int. Heat Transfer Conf., Ðàris (1970), paper No. B1.1.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Hocine Benhamza.

Additional information

Published in Inzhenerno-Fizicheskii Zhurnal, Vol. 84, No. 2, pp. 286–291, March–April, 2011.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hocine Benhamza, M.E., Chouarfa, F. Modeling of the solid–liquid bubble interface in partial nucleate boiling. J Eng Phys Thermophy 84, 305–311 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-011-0474-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10891-011-0474-z

Keywords

Navigation