Skip to main content
Log in

Sugars in Mediterranean Floral Nectars: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-pressure liquid chromatography analyses of 73 plant species showed that the nectars of phrygana (East Mediterranean garrigue) mainly contain sucrose, glucose, and fructose, and traces of 10 minor sugars. Although the sucrose/hexose ratio was not related to plant life habit, ecological constraints had a detectable effect in shaping sugar composition. This was detected by distinguishing the phryganic plant species into “spring–summer” and “winter” flowering, with the distinction made on the basis of the water deficit in the study area. Plants flowering in spring–summer had a higher rate of “high sucrose” (i.e., sucrose/hexose ratio ≥0.5; 60.8% of the plant species) vs. “low hexose” nectars (i.e., ratio <0.5; 39.2%). The ratio was reversed in winter flowering species (36.4% vs. 63.6% with “high sucrose” and “high hexose,” respectively). Sucrose/hexose ratios were associated with plant family. The highest values were those of Lamiaceae, which differed significantly from the “low sucrose” Liliaceae and Apiaceae. Based on recorded plant–pollinator interactions in the community, the present data provide evidence of a partitioning of nectar resources by the existing pollinator guilds within the community, based on the sugar profiles of nectar (all sucrose/hexose ratios for all interactions). Among all major groups, bees and wasps (aculeates) preferred “high sucrose” nectars, which differed significantly from syrphids, anthomyid a.o. flies, and beetles that visited “low sucrose” nectars. Similarly, butterflies visited “lower sucrose” nectars compared to bees. Within families, only Megachilidae could be clearly characterized as “high sucrose” consumers, differing in this respect from all the remaining insect groups including most other bee families. This confirms previous findings that Megachilidae have a key position in Mediterranean communities where they probably constitute a selective factor for “high sucrose” nectars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H. G. Baker I. Baker (1975) Studies of nectar constitution and pollinator–plant coevolution L. E. Gilbert P. H. Raven (Eds) Coevolution of Animals and Plants University of Texas Press Austin 100–140

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Baker I. Baker (1979) ArticleTitleSugar ratios in nectars Phytochem. Bull. 12 43–45

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Baker I. Baker (1982) Chemical constituents of nectar in relation to pollination mechanisms and phylogeny M. H. Nitecki (Eds) Biochemical Aspects of Evolutionary Biology—Proceedings of the 4th Annual Spring Systematics Symposium University of Chicago Press Chicago 131–172

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Baker I. Baker (1983) Floral nectar sugar constituents in relation to pollinator type C. E. Jones R. J. Little (Eds) Handbook of Experimental Pollination Ecology Van Nostrand-Reinhold New York 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Baker I. Baker (1986) ArticleTitleThe occurrence and significance of amino acids in floral nectar Plant Syst. Evol. 151 175–186

    Google Scholar 

  • H. G. Baker I. Baker (1990) ArticleTitleThe predictive value of nectar chemistry to the recognition of pollinator types Isr. J. Botan. 39 157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • J. C. Biesmeijer J. A. P. Richter M. A. J. P. Smets M. J. Sommeijer (1999) ArticleTitleNiche differentiation in nectar-collecting stingless bees: The influence of morphology, floral choice and interference competition Ecol. Entomol. 24 380–388

    Google Scholar 

  • S. A. Corbet P. G. Willmer J. W. L. Beament D. M. Unwin O. E. Prys-Jones (1979) ArticleTitlePost-secretory determinants of sugar concentration in nectar Plant Cell Environ. 2 293–308

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Dafni Y. Lensky A. Fahn (1988) ArticleTitleFlower and nectar characteristics of nine species of Labiatae and their influence on honeybee visits J. Apic. Res. 27 103–114

    Google Scholar 

  • M. E. Dodd J. Silvertown M. W. Chase (1999) ArticleTitlePhylogenetic analysis of trait evolution and species diversity variation among angiosperm families Evolution 53 732–744

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Gottsberger J. Schrauwen H. F. Linskens (1984) ArticleTitleAmino acids and sugars in nectar, and their putative evolutionary significance Plant Syst. Evol. 145 55–77

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Herrera (1985) ArticleTitleNectar secretion patterns in southern Spanish Mediterranean scrublands Isr. J. Botan. 34 47–58

    Google Scholar 

  • J. P. Kochmer S. N. Handel (1986) ArticleTitleConstraints and competition in the evolution of flowering phenology Ecol. Monogr. 56 303–325

    Google Scholar 

  • C. D. Michener (1979) ArticleTitleBiogeography of the bees Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 66 277–347

    Google Scholar 

  • C. D. Michener (2000) The Bees of the World The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Nicolson (1998) ArticleTitleThe importance of osmosis in nectar secretion and its consumption by insects Am. Zool. 38 418–425

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Nicolson (2002) ArticleTitlePollination by passerine birds: Why are the nectars so dilute? Comp. Biochem. Phys., B. 131 645–652

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Nicolson B. E. Wyk ParticleVan (1998) ArticleTitleNectar sugars in Proteaceae: Patterns and processes Aust. J. Bot. 46 489–504

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Pagano K. Gauvreau (1993) Principles of Biostatistics Duxbury Press Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • J. S. Pate M. B. Peoples P. J. Storer C. A. Atkins (1985) ArticleTitleThe extrafloral nectaries of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). II. Nectar composition, origin of nectar solutes, and nectary functioning Planta 166 28–38

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Percival (1961) ArticleTitleTypes of nectar in angiosperms New Phytol. 60 235–281

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Percival (1965) Floral Biology Pergamon Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou, T. 1991. Pollination ecology in a phryganic ecosystem. Ph.D. thesis (in Greek, with English summary). Aristotle University, Thessaloniki.

  • T. Petanidou (1996) ArticleTitleLabiatae: A key family for wild bees and the pollination ecology in Mediterranean phryganic communities Lamiales Newsl. 4 4–6

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou W. N. Ellis (1993) ArticleTitlePollinating fauna of a phryganic ecosystem: Composition and diversity Biodiversity Lett. 1 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou W. N. Ellis (1996) Interdependence of native bee faunas and floras in changing Mediterranean communities A. Matheson S. L. Buchmann C. O’Toole P. Westrich I. H. Williams (Eds) The Conservation Biology of Bees. Linnean Society Symposium Series No. 18 Academic Press London 201–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou, T. and Potts, S. G. 2005. Mutual use of resources in Mediterranean plant–pollinator communities: How specialised are pollination webs?, in N. Waser and J. Ollerton (eds.). Specialization and Generalization in Plant–Pollinator Interactions. University of Chicago Press, in press.

  • T. Petanidou E. Smets (1995) ArticleTitleThe potential of marginal lands for bees and apiculture: Nectar secretion in Mediterranean shrublands Apidologie 26 39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou D. Vokou (1990) ArticleTitlePollination and pollen energetics in Mediterranean ecosystems Am. J. Bot. 77 986–992

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou D. Vokou (1993) ArticleTitlePollination ecology of Labiatae in a phryganic (East Mediterranean) ecosystem Am. J. Bot. 80 892–899

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou W. N. Ellis N. S. Margaris D. Vokou (1995) ArticleTitleConstraints on flowering phenology in a phryganic (East Mediterranean shrub) community Am. J. Bot. 82 607–620

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou A. Laere ParticleVan E. Smets (1996) ArticleTitleChange in floral nectar components from fresh to senescent flowers of Capparis spinosa L., a nocturnally flowering Mediterranean shrub Plant Syst. Evol. 199 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Petanidou V. Goethals E. Smets (2000) ArticleTitleNectary structure of Labiatae in relation to their nectar secretion and characteristics in a Mediterranean shrub community—Does flowering time matter? Plant Syst. Evol. 225 103–118

    Google Scholar 

  • G. H. Pyke N. M. Waser (1981) ArticleTitleOn the production of dilute nectars by hummingbird and honeyeater flowers Biotropica 13 260–270

    Google Scholar 

  • H. P. Rusterholz A. Erhardt (1997) ArticleTitlePreferences for nectar sugars in the peacock butterfly, Inachis io Ecol. Entomol. 22 220–224

    Google Scholar 

  • E. E. Southwick (1982) Nectar biology and pollinator attraction in the north temperate climate M. C. D. Breed C. Michener H. E. Evans (Eds) The Biology of Social Insects Westview Press Boulder 19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • F. G. Stiles C. E. Freeman (1993) ArticleTitlePatterns in floral nectar characteristics of some bird-visited plant species from Costa Rica Biotropica 25 191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • The International Plant Names Index. 2004. http://www.ipni.org.

  • Waser, N. and Ollerton, J. 2005. Specialization and Generalization in Plant–Pollinator Interactions. University of Chicago Press, in press.

  • H. Wells P. S. Hill P. H. Wells (1992) ArticleTitleNectarivore foraging ecology—Rewards differing in sugar types Ecol. Entomol. 17 280–288

    Google Scholar 

  • G. R. Wykes (1952) ArticleTitleAn investigation of the sugars present in the nectar of flowers of various species New Phytol. 51 210–215

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by an EC grant (DG VI-contract AIR3-BM92-004). I thank Prof. E. Smets and Prof. A. Van Laere for offering laboratory facilities at the Catholic University of Leuven; E. Nackaerts and V. Goethals for technical assistance on sugar analyses; Prof. Sue Nicolson, Prof. Peter J. Davies, Dr. Ellen Lamborn and an anonymous reviewer for invaluable comments on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodora Petanidou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petanidou, T. Sugars in Mediterranean Floral Nectars: An Ecological and Evolutionary Approach. J Chem Ecol 31, 1065–1088 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-4248-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-4248-y

Key Words

Navigation