Abstract
A response class hierarchy (RCH) is a ranking of the behaviors within a response class, such that the behaviors occur in a predictable, temporal order. In the current study, we identified a RCH through an extinction analysis for two individuals who exhibited multiple topographies of problem behavior. Potential replacement communication responses were identified during the extinction analysis for each participant. We then examined the emergence and subsequent reinforcement of the identified communication responses in the absence of explicit training during treatment analyses. Reinforcement of communication in combination with other treatment components (e.g., extinction; discriminative stimuli) resulted in expansion of the RCH and decreased occurrences of problem behavior.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baer, D. M. (1982). The imposition of structure on behavior and the demolition of behavior structures. In H. E. Howe (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Catania, A. C. (1998). Learning (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Fisher, W. W., & Mazur, J. E. (1997). Basic and applied research on choice responding. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 30, 387–410.
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., Bowman, L. G., Hagopian, L. P., Owens, J. C., & Slevin, I. (1992). A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 491–498.
Fisher, W. W., Piazza, C. C., & Chiang, C. L. (1996). Effects of equal and unequal reinforcer duration during functional analysis. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 29, 117–120.
Grow, L. L., Kelley, M. E., Roane, H. S., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2008). Utility of extinction-induced response variability for selection of mands. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41, 15–24.
Hagopian, L. P., Contrucci Kuhn, S. A., Long, E. S., & Rush, K. S. (2005). Schedule thinning following communication training: using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 177–193.
Hanley, G. P., Iwata, B. A., & Thompson, R. H. (2001). Reinforcement schedule thinning following treatment with functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 17–38.
Iwata, B. A., Dorsey, M. F., Slifer, K. J., Bauman, K. E., & Richman, G. S. (1994). Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 197–209 (Reprinted from Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 3–20, 1982).
Kelley, M. E., Lerman, D. C., Fisher, W. W., Roane, H. S., & Zangrillo, A. N. (2011). Reinforcement delay fading during differential reinforcement of communication: the effects of signals on response maintenance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 107–122.
Lalli, J. S., Mace, F. C., Wohn, T., & Livezey, K. (1995). Identification and modification of a response-class hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28, 551–559.
Lieving, G. A., Hagopian, L. P., Long, E. S., & O’Connor, J. (2004). Response-class hierarchies and resurgence of severe problem behavior. The Psychological Record, 54, 621–634.
Mace, F. C. (1994). Basic research needed for stimulating development of behavioral technologies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 529–550.
Mace, F. C., Pratt, J. L., Prager, K. L., & Pritchard, D. (2011). An evaluation of three methods of saying “no” to avoid an escalating response class hierarchy. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 83–94.
Neef, N. A., Mace, F. C., Shea, M. C., & Shade, D. (1992). Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: extensions of matching theory to educational settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 691–699.
Neef, N. A., Mace, F. C., & Shade, D. (1993). Impulsivity is students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26, 37–52.
Richman, D. M., Wacker, D. P., Asmus, J. M., Casey, S. D., & Andelman, M. (1999). Further analysis of problem behavior in response class hierarchies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 32, 269–283.
Shabani, D. B., Carr, J. E., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2009). A laboratory model for studying response-class hierarchies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 105–121.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
DeRosa, N.M., Roane, H.S., Doyle, N.M. et al. Modification of Response Class Hierarchies Through Differential Reinforcement of Functionally Equivalent Communication. J Dev Phys Disabil 25, 119–133 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9312-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9312-2