Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Moderating Role of Intergroup Contact in Race Composition, Perceived Similarity, and Applicant Attraction Relationships

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study investigated the moderating effect of intergroup contact on the relationship between the race composition of organizational representatives, perceived similarity, and minority applicant attraction.

Design/Methodology/Approach

344 minority Malaysian-Chinese university students read a job advertisement that varied the racial composition of organizational representatives (100 % Malay or 50 % Malay–50 % Chinese or 100 % Chinese). Of these participants, 161 were Malaysian-Chinese in Malaysia (high intergroup contact location) and 183 were Malaysian-Chinese in Australia (low intergroup contact location). After reading the advertisement, participants responded to a series of scale items (e.g., perceived surface-level similarity, perceived deep-level similarity, and applicant attraction).

Findings

Results showed that the effect of race composition on attraction was stronger for minority participants in Australia than for minority participants in Malaysia. Perceived deep-level similarity mediated this moderated relationship.

Implications

The study findings suggest that organizations should include minority representatives in their recruitment advertising to attract minority applicants, particularly to attract minorities in locations with few opportunities for intergroup contact.

Originality/Value

By testing the mediating effects of perceived surface-level and deep-level similarity, this study contributes to our understanding of the mechanism linking the interaction between race composition and location with applicant attraction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Khalid, M. (2011). NEP to NEM: Who cares? Wealth distribution in Malaysia. Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia ke VI (PERKEM VI) (pp. 400–409), June 2011.

  • Agadjanian, V., & Liew, H. P. (2005). Preferential policies and ethnic differences in post-secondary education in Peninsular Malaysia. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8, 213–230. doi:10.1080/13613320500110659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., Mahto, R. V., & Otondo, R. F. (2007). Web-based recruitment: Effects of information, organizational brand, and attitudes toward a web site on applicant attraction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1696–1708. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anastasio, P., Bachman, B., Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. (1997). Categorization, recategorization and common ingroup identity. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 236–256). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ancheh, K. S. B. (2005). Factors influencing students’ choice of Malaysian private higher education institutions. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Adelaide, SA: University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. doi:10.5465/AMR.1989.4278999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, D. R. (2003). Reactions to diversity in recruitment advertising: Are differences black and white? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 672–679. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.672.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, D. R., Hernandez, M., & Hebl, M. R. (2004). Who’s watching the race? Racial salience in recruitment advertising. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 146–161. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02541.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, D. R., & Thomas, K. M. (2004). Blending content and contact: the roles of diversity curriculum and campus heterogeneity in fostering diversity management competency. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(4), 380–396. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2004.15112544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees: Individual and organizational perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskett, G. D. (1973). Interview decisions as determined by competency and attitude similarity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 343–345. doi:10.1037/h0034707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernama. (2012). Jobseekers must keep an open mind. Retrieved November 3, 2012 from http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/11/03/jobseekers-must-keep-an-open-mind/.

  • Biernat, M. (1990). Stereotypes on campus: How contact and liking influence perceptions of group distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20(18, Pt 2), 1485–1513. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01489.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. B., & Miller, N. (Eds.). (1984). Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., Eller, A., Leeds, S., & Stace, K. (2007). Intergroup contact and intergroup attitudes: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(4), 692–703. doi:10.1002/ejsp.384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R., & Turner, J. (1981). Interpersonal and intergroup behaviour. In J. Turner & H. Giles (Eds.), Intergroup behaviour (pp. 33–65). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D., & Clore, G. L. (1970). A reinforcement model of evaluative responses. Personality: An International Journal, 1(2), 103–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Graham, M. E. (2000). The determinants of job seekers’ reputation perceptions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 929–947. doi:10.1002/1099-1379(200012)21:8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, S. A. (2005). The influence of fit perceptions, equal opportunity policies, and social support network on pre-entry police officer career commitment and intentions to remain. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(4), 341–352. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2005.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carless, S. A., & Imber, A. (2007). The influence of perceived interviewer and job and organizational characteristics on applicant attraction and job choice intentions: The role of applicant anxiety. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(4), 359–371. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2007.00395.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, W. J., Wayne, J. H., & Manegold, J. G. (2013). Who will we recruit? Targeting deep-and surface-level diversity with human resource policy advertising. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005). Applicant attraction to organizations and job choice: a meta-analytic review of the correlates of recruiting outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 928–944. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chattopadhyay, P., Tluchowska, M., & George, E. (2004). Identifying the in-group: A closer look at the influence of demographic dissimilarity on employee social identity. Academy of Management Review, 29, 180–202. doi:10.5465/AMR.2004.12736071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. W. (1978). Interpersonal and attitudinal outcomes in cooperating interracial groups. Journal of Research & Development in Education, 12(1), 97–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T, Jr. (2001). Creating the multicultural organization: A strategy for capturing the power of diversity. Business school management series. Michigan: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(1), 67–76. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.79.1.67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, G. B. (2007). Perceptions as reality: The influence of actual and perceived demographic dissimilarity. Journal of Business Psychology, 22, 79–89. doi:10.1007/s10869-007-9052-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2010). Population and demography: Population distribution and basic demographic characteristics. Retrieved October 20, 2011 from http://www.statistics.gov.my/portal/download_Population/files/census2010/Taburan_Penduduk_dan_Ciri-ciri_Asas_Demografi.pdf.

  • Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., & Kawakami, K. (2003). Intergroup contact: The past, present, and the future. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 5–21. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsass, P. M., & Graves, L. M. (1997). Demographic diversity in decision-making groups: The experiences of women and people of color. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 946–973. doi:10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., Judge, T. A., Rowland, K. M., & Fitzgibbons, D. E. (1994). Subordinate influence and the performance evaluation process: Test of a model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(1), 101–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2000). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The common ingroup identity model: Recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1994). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias. Small Group Research, 25(2), 224–249. doi:10.1177/1046496494252005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaertner, S. L., Rust, M. C., Dovidio, J. F., Bachman, B. A., & Anastasio, P. A. (1996). The contact hypothesis: The role of a common ingroup identity on reducing intergroup bias among majority and minority group members. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 230–260). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, C. B. (2005). Relational demography and similarity-attraction in interview assessments and subsequent offer decisions: Are we missing something? Group Organization Management, 30, 597–624. doi:10.1177/1059601104267661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, N. C., Panter, A. T., Daye, C. E., Allen, W. A., Wightman, L. F., & Deo, M. E. (2008). Does diversity at undergraduate institutions influence student outcomes? Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(2), 80–94. doi:10.1037/1938-8926.1.2.80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. M., & Powell, G. N. (1995). The effect of sex similarity on recruiters’ evaluations of actual applicants: A test of the similarity-attraction paradigm. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 85–98. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01747.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. doi:10.2307/256901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J., & Florey, A. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 1029–1045. doi:10.2307/3069328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67, 451–470. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F. (2003). Measuring attraction to organizations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 63(6), 986–1001. doi:10.1177/0013164403258403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. J. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 121–140. doi:10.5465/AMR.2000.2791606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 386–408. doi:10.5465/AMR.2006.20208687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraichy, D., & Chapman, D. S. (2014). Tailoring Web-Based Recruiting Messages: Individual Differences in the Persuasiveness of Affective and Cognitive Messages. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(2), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1991). Intergroup relations and organizational dilemmas: The role of categorization processes. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 191–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, C. T., Roberson, L., & Perry, E. L. (2007). The multiple-category problem: Category activation and inhibition in the hiring process. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 529–548. doi:10.5465/AMR.2007.24351855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., Karakowsky, L., & Siegel, J. P. (1999). The effects of proportional representation on intragroup behavior in mixed-race decision-making groups. Small Group Research, 30(3), 259–279. doi:10.1177/104649649903000301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnehan, F., Chrobot-Mason, D., & Konrad, A. M. (2006). Diversity attitudes and norms: The role of ethnic identity and relational demography. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27(4), 419–442. doi:10.1002/job.382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, R. (2012). Malaysia, a racialized nation: Study of the concept of race in Malaysia. Paper presented at International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research: Knowledge, Culture and Society, 42, 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, J. (2013). Is Malaysia university entry a level playing field? Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-23841888.

  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, L. A., Thomas, K. M., & Taylor, G. A. (2000). Advertising and recruitment: Marketing to minorities. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 235–255. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200003)17:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1971). Racially separate or together?. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934. doi:10.1002/ejsp.504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumer, B. (2013). These ten charts show the black-white economic gap hasn’t budged in 50 years. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/08/28/these-seven-charts-show-the-black-white-economic-gap-hasnt-budged-in-50-years.

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. doi:10.1177/014920638601200408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratto, F., Liu, J. H., Levin, S., Sidanius, J., Shih, M., Bachrach, H., & Hegarty, P. (2000). Social dominance orientation and the legitimization of inequality across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31, 369–409. doi:10.1177/0022022100031003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 164–177. doi:10.2307/1556374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riordan, C. M. (2000). Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 131–173). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. L. (1991). Recruitment, job choice, and post-hire consequences: A call for new directions. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 399–444). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett, P. R., & Larson, J. R, Jr. (1990). Research strategies and tactics in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 419–489). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava, S., & Gregory, J. (2009). Exploring the antecedents of perceived diversity. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(4), 526–542. doi:10.5172/jmo.15.4.526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedley, B. D., Butler, A. S., & Bristow, L. R. (Eds.). (2004). In the nation’s compelling interest: Ensuring diversity in the health care workforce. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374. doi:10.2307/1882010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, A. M. (2002). Malaysian private higher education: Globalization, privatization, transformation and marketplaces. London, UK: Asean Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, E. & Sharma, Y. (2013). Uproar over ‘race bias’ in public university places. University World News, 281. Retrieved from http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20130717110401762.

  • The Economist. (2005). Race in Malaysia: Failing to spread the wealth. Retrieved January 3, 2013 from http://www.economist.com/node/4323219?Story_ID=E1_QPNPNTJ.

  • Tsui, A. S., Egan, T. D., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549–579. doi:10.5465/AMBPP.1991.4976867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A. I. I. I. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402–423. doi:10.2307/256368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarities: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228–234. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in group processes: Theory and research, 2, 77–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Bavel, J. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2009). Self-categorization with a novel mixed-race group moderates automatic social and racial biases. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(3), 321–335. doi:10.1177/0146167208327743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WealthInequality.org. (2015). Immigrants and wealth. Retrieved from http://wealthinequality.org/Immigrants_and_Wealth.html.

  • Wells, C. L., IV. (2008). The relationship between potential job applicants’ ethnic identity and their attraction to organizations as a function of the racial diversity depicted in recruitment brochures. Unpublished master thesis, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

  • Williams, R. M, Jr. (1947). The reduction of intergroup tensions: A survey of research on problems of ethnic, racial, and religious group relations. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsko, C., Park, B., Judd, C. M., & Bachelor, J. (2003). Intergroup contact: Effects on group evaluations and perceived variability. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 93–110. doi:10.1177/1368430203006001014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., Maloney, M. M., Bhappu, A. D., & Salvador, R. (2008). When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(1), 41–59. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, HELP University, Level 8, Wisma HELP, Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights, Kuala Lumpur, 50490, Malaysia

    Yin Lu Ng

  2. Centre for HRM, School of Management, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Carol T. Kulik

  3. Research School of Management, College of Business & Economics, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Prashant Bordia

Authors
  1. Yin Lu Ng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carol T. Kulik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prashant Bordia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yin Lu Ng.

Appendix: 50% Malay–50% Chinese condition

Appendix: 50% Malay–50% Chinese condition

figure a

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ng, Y.L., Kulik, C.T. & Bordia, P. The Moderating Role of Intergroup Contact in Race Composition, Perceived Similarity, and Applicant Attraction Relationships. J Bus Psychol 31, 415–431 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9419-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9419-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation