Abstract
This article explores the personal identities of two prospective elementary teachers as they progressed from mathematics methods coursework into their capstone student teaching semester. Results indicate that both prospective teachers perceived contrasting obligations of effective mathematics teaching in the teacher education and student teaching contexts, yet came to reconcile these differences in different ways. Whereas one prospective teacher was able to oppose the obligations set forth in the student teaching context, the other complied with obligations in both the teacher education and student teaching contexts. Implications for teacher education include differentiated experiences and placements, methods design, and explicit foci on students’ mathematical thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, J. (2000). Social practice theory and mathematics teacher education: A conversation between theory and practice. Nordic Mathematics Education Journal, 8(3), 31–53.
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319.
Bambino, D. (2002). Critical friends. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 25–27.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1996). Cognitively guided instruction: A knowledge base for reform in primary mathematics instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 97(1), 3–20.
Cobb, P., Gresalfi, M., & Hodge, L. L. (2009). An interpretive scheme for analyzing the identities that students develop in mathematics classrooms. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40(1), 40–68.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (Eds.). (2010). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Routledge.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers.
Conference Board for the Mathematical Sciences (CBMS). (2012). The mathematical education of teachers II volume 17 of issues in mathematics education. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Fennema, E., Carpenter, T. P., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., Jacobs, V. R., & Empson, S. B. (1996). A longitudinal study of learning to use children’s thinking in mathematics instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 403–434.
Gresalfi, M. S., & Cobb, P. (2011). Negotiating identities for mathematics teaching in the context of professional development. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 270–304.
Henry, G. T., Purtell, K. M., Bastian, K. C., Fortner, C. K., Thompson, C. L., Campbell, S. L., & Patterson, K. M. (2013). The effects of teacher entry portals on student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 67, 7–23.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 372–400.
Hodges, T. E., & Cady, J. A. (2012). Negotiating contexts to construct an identity as a mathematics teacher. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 112–122.
Hodges, T. E., & Mills, H. (2014). Embedded field experiences as professional apprenticeships. In K. Karp & A. R. McDuffie (Eds.), Annual perspectves in mathematics education 2014: Using research to improve instruction (pp. 249–260). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Jong, C., & Hodges, T. E. (2015). Assessing attitudes toward mathematics across teacher education contexts. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(5), 407–425.
Kazemi, E., & Franke, M. L. (2004). Teacher learning in mathematics: Using student work to promote collective inquiry. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 7(3), 203–235.
LeCompte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 146–154.
Lord, B. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: Critical colleagueship and the role of professional communities (pp. 175–204). The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in education.
Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press Chicago.
Moyer, P. S., & Husman, J. (2006). Integrating coursework and field placements: The impact on preservice elementary mathematics teachers’ connections to teaching. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(1), 37–56.
Nasir, N. S., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61.
Nasir, N. S., & Hand, V. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 449–475.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2007). Mathematics teaching today. Reston, VA: Author.
National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Tripp, L., & Eick, C. (2008). Match-making to enhance the mentoring relationship in student teaching: Learning from a simple personality instrument. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2). Retrieved from: http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/download/7772/5539
Vacc, N. N., & Bright, G. W. (1999). Elementary preservice teachers’ changing beliefs and instructional use of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 89–110.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Wood, M. B. (2013). Mathematical micro-identities: Moment-to-moment positioning and learning in a fourth-grade classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 775–808.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Sample interview questions
-
1.
(Pre-teaching only) Please tell me some of the most important things you thought about as you created your teacher work sample.
-
(a)
What made you think ____ was an important thing to consider?
-
(b)
(At intervals), please give me an example of how those thoughts about __ show up in your plans.
-
(a)
-
2.
(Pre-teaching only) How did these ideas relate to your experiences in your courses?
-
(a)
Were there particular experiences in your math methods courses that are reflected in your teacher work sample?
-
(a)
-
3.
(Pre-teaching only) Describe your assessment plan?
-
(a)
What most influenced your thoughts on your assessment plan?
-
(a)
-
4.
Picture walking into a classroom and seeing the best teacher teaching mathematics.
-
(a)
What is s/he doing?
-
(b)
What are the students doing?
-
(c)
What kinds of materials and resources might this teacher/students be using?
-
(d)
What do you think this best teacher’s plans for instruction look like?
-
(e)
How do you think this best teacher assesses students?
-
(a)
-
5.
What aspects of this “best” teacher do you think are reflected in your teacher work sample?
-
6.
What aspects of this “best” teacher do you think are not reflected in your teacher work sample?
-
(a)
What keeps you from being able to do these things?
-
(a)
-
7.
(Pre-teaching only) What role, if any, did the following resources play in planning instruction and assessment for your teacher work sample?
-
(a)
University supervisor
-
(b)
Other university faculty
-
(c)
Cooperating teacher
-
(d)
Other faculty in host school
-
(e)
Adopted textbook
-
(f)
Other print resources
-
(g)
State curriculum or other Standards
-
(h)
Research/literature in mathematics education
-
(i)
Internet searches
-
(j)
Other web-based resources
-
(k)
Materials from coursework (if yes, ask for specific courses and items)
-
(l)
Your own knowledge and experiences as a K-12 student
-
(a)
-
8.
(Reserved for post-teaching interview protocol) Did you make any changes to the unit plan after you started teaching it?
-
(a)
If so, what prompted you to make those changes?
-
(b)
If so, what changes did you make?
-
(a)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hodges, T.E., Hodge, L.L. Unpacking personal identities for teaching mathematics within the context of prospective teacher education. J Math Teacher Educ 20, 101–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9339-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9339-2