Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring iconic interpretation and mathematics teacher development through clinical simulations

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field placements serve as the traditional ‘clinical’ experience for prospective mathematics teachers to immerse themselves in the mathematical challenges of students. This article reports data from a different type of learning experience, that of a clinical simulation with a standardized individual. We begin with a brief background on medical education’s long-standing use of standardized patients, and the recent diffusion of clinical simulations to teacher and school leader preparation contexts. Then, we describe a single mathematics simulation and report data from prospective mathematics teachers’ interactions with a standardized student on the issue of iconic interpretation. Findings highlight teachers’ diagnostic, explanatory, mathematical, and instructional repertoires, as they guide a standardized student through two different graphing problems. Implications focus on the trends in teachers’ instructional decisions, contextualized explanations, and the use of clinical simulations to enhance mathematics teacher development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 52, 215–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (1987). Simulated (standardized) patients and other human simulations: A comprehensive guide to their training and use in teaching and evaluation. Chapel Hill, NC: Health Sciences Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, H. S., & Abrahmson, S. (1964). The programmed patient: A technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. Journal of Medical Education, 39, 802–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clermont, C., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 21–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, B., Essary, A. C., Lohenry, K., & Stoehr, J. D. (2008). An update on the utilization of standardized patients in physician assistant education. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 19(4), 14–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B. (2011). From know how to do now: Instructional applications of simulated interactions within teacher education. Teacher Education and Practice, 24(2), 132–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B. (2013). “I had no idea!”: Clinical simulations for teacher development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dotger, B. (2014). Core pedagogy: Individual uncertainty, shared practice, formative ethos. Article submitted for publication.

  • Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauer, K. E., Hodgson, C. S., Kerr, K. M., Teherani, A., & Irby, D. M. (2005). A national study of medical student clinical skills assessment. Academic Medicine, 80(10), S25–S29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Phillip, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Geslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–380). New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A., & Kessels, J. P. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monk, S. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Learning to graph and graphing to learn. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 250–262). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1959). Logic and psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiman, A. J., & Peace, S. D. (2002). Promoting teachers’ moral reasoning and collaborative inquiry performance: A developmental role-taking and guided inquiry study. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43, 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., & Colestock, A. A. (2011). Accessing mathematics teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 79–94). New York: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Speech presented at the Math Science Partnership (MSP) Workshop: “Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning”. Irvine, CA.

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation’s Discovery Research K-12 (DR-K12) program for its support of this research (Award #1118772). The perspectives represented in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views or opinions of the National Science Foundation. Additionally, the authors acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of three JMTE reviewers and their contributions to refining this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Dotger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dotger, B., Masingila, J., Bearkland, M. et al. Exploring iconic interpretation and mathematics teacher development through clinical simulations. J Math Teacher Educ 18, 577–601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9290-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9290-7

Keywords

Navigation