Abstract
Field placements serve as the traditional ‘clinical’ experience for prospective mathematics teachers to immerse themselves in the mathematical challenges of students. This article reports data from a different type of learning experience, that of a clinical simulation with a standardized individual. We begin with a brief background on medical education’s long-standing use of standardized patients, and the recent diffusion of clinical simulations to teacher and school leader preparation contexts. Then, we describe a single mathematics simulation and report data from prospective mathematics teachers’ interactions with a standardized student on the issue of iconic interpretation. Findings highlight teachers’ diagnostic, explanatory, mathematical, and instructional repertoires, as they guide a standardized student through two different graphing problems. Implications focus on the trends in teachers’ instructional decisions, contextualized explanations, and the use of clinical simulations to enhance mathematics teacher development.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arcavi, A. (2003). The role of visual representations in the learning of mathematics. Educational studies in mathematics, 52, 215–241.
Barrows, H. S. (1987). Simulated (standardized) patients and other human simulations: A comprehensive guide to their training and use in teaching and evaluation. Chapel Hill, NC: Health Sciences Consortium.
Barrows, H. S. (2000). Problem-based learning applied to medical education. Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.
Barrows, H. S., & Abrahmson, S. (1964). The programmed patient: A technique for appraising student performance in clinical neurology. Journal of Medical Education, 39, 802–805.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 417–436.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.
Clermont, C., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1993). The influence of an intensive in-service workshop on pedagogical content knowledge growth among novice chemical demonstrators. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 21–43.
Coplan, B., Essary, A. C., Lohenry, K., & Stoehr, J. D. (2008). An update on the utilization of standardized patients in physician assistant education. The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, 19(4), 14–19.
Dotger, B. (2011). From know how to do now: Instructional applications of simulated interactions within teacher education. Teacher Education and Practice, 24(2), 132–148.
Dotger, B. (2013). “I had no idea!”: Clinical simulations for teacher development. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Dotger, B. (2014). Core pedagogy: Individual uncertainty, shared practice, formative ethos. Article submitted for publication.
Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2011). Teachers attending to students’ mathematical reasoning: Lessons from an after-school research program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 49–66.
Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
Hauer, K. E., Hodgson, C. S., Kerr, K. M., Teherani, A., & Irby, D. M. (2005). A national study of medical student clinical skills assessment. Academic Medicine, 80(10), S25–S29.
Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Phillip, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In D. Geslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–380). New York: Rand McNally.
Korthagen, F. A., & Kessels, J. P. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4–17.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 4–16.
Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), PCK and science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Klewer Academic Publishers.
Masingila, J. O., & Doerr, H. M. (2002). Understanding pre-service teachers’ emerging practices through their analyses of a multimedia case study of practice. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 235–263.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Monk, S. (2003). Representation in school mathematics: Learning to graph and graphing to learn. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 250–262). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
Piaget, J. (1959). Logic and psychology. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Reiman, A. J., & Peace, S. D. (2002). Promoting teachers’ moral reasoning and collaborative inquiry performance: A developmental role-taking and guided inquiry study. Journal of Moral Education, 31(1), 51–66.
Santagata, R., & Guarino, J. (2011). Using video to teach future teachers to learn from teaching. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 43, 133–145.
Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., & Colestock, A. A. (2011). Accessing mathematics teachers’ in-the-moment noticing. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 79–94). New York: Taylor and Francis.
Shulman, L. S. (2005). The signature pedagogies of the professions of law, medicine, engineering, and the clergy: Potential lessons for the education of teachers. Speech presented at the Math Science Partnership (MSP) Workshop: “Teacher Education for Effective Teaching and Learning”. Irvine, CA.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Education and the Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from http://depts.washington.edu/ctpmail/PDFs/TeacherPrep-WFFM-02-2001.pdf.
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation’s Discovery Research K-12 (DR-K12) program for its support of this research (Award #1118772). The perspectives represented in this manuscript are solely those of the authors and do not represent the views or opinions of the National Science Foundation. Additionally, the authors acknowledge and appreciate the contributions of three JMTE reviewers and their contributions to refining this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dotger, B., Masingila, J., Bearkland, M. et al. Exploring iconic interpretation and mathematics teacher development through clinical simulations. J Math Teacher Educ 18, 577–601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9290-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-014-9290-7