Skip to main content
Log in

Design and in vitro evaluation of transdermal patches based on ibuprofen-loaded electrospun fiber mats

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To improve the poor compatibility among different components of Drug-in-adhesive type patch, two novel plasters (Drug-in-fiber and Drug-in-adhesive/fiber) were developed based on ibuprofen (IBU)-loaded fiber mats. These fibrous mats were fabricated via electrospinning of cellulose acetate/poly(vinylpyrrolidone) composites in a binary solvent of N,N-dimethyl acetamide/acetone. Physical status studies suggested that Drug-in-fiber could inhibit IBU re-crystallization, but the active ingredients were released at a relatively slow rate due to the dual-resistance of fiber mat and adhesive matrix. To overcome this shortcoming, Drug-in-adhesive/fiber was designed by coupling medicated hydrophilic pressure sensitive adhesive and IBU-loaded fiber mat. This method endowed Drug-in-adhesive/fiber a fast IBU release rate and high permeated drug amount though simulative skins. This design separated enhancer from adhesive matrix, which guaranteed Drug-in-adhesive/fiber excellent adhesion forces. Hence, the plasters based on medicated fiber mats improved the compatibility among patch components.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Scheme 1
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Scheme 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wokovich AM, Prodduturi S, Doub WH, Hussain AS, Buhse LF. Transdermal drug delivery system (TDDS) adhesion as a critical safety, efficacy and quality attribute. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2006;64:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Prausnitz MR, Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:1261–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer R. Transdermal drug delivery: past progress, current status, and future prospects. Adv Drug Dev Rev. 2004;56:557–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sartorelli P, Andersen HR, Angerer J, Corish J, Drexler H, Goen T, Griffin P, Hotchkiss SAM, Larese F, Montomoli L. Percutaneous penetration studies for risk asessment. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2000;8:133–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang HC, Wu SS, Wang YF, Wang HM. Quantification of porcine skin permeability in transdermal diffusion with a numerical model. J Taiwan Inst Chem E. 2010;41:136–42.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JI, Choi HK. Effect of additives on the crystallization and the permeation of ketoprofen from adhesive matrix. Int J Pharm. 2002;236:81–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugibayashi K, Morimoto Y. Polymers for transdermal drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 1994;29:177–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Latsch S, Selzer T, Fink L, Kreuter J. Crystallisation of estradiol containing TDDS determined by isothermal micro-calorimetry, X-ray diffraction, and optical microscopy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2003;56:43–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang J, Deng L, Zhao H, Liu M, Jin H, Li J, Dong A. Pressure sensitive adhesive properties of poly(N-vinyl pyrrolidone)/D, l-lactic acid oligomer/glycerol/water blends for TDDS. J Biomat Sci-Polym E. 2010;21:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jain P, Banga AK. Inhibition of crystallization in Drug-in-adhesive-type transdermal patches. Inter J Pharm. 2010;394:68–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu JJ, Chien T, Chien Y. Transdermal dual-controlled delivery of testosterone and estradiol: (I) impact of system design. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1991;17:1883–904.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulz M, Fussnegger B, Bodmeiera R. Drug release and adhesive properties of crospovidone-containing matrix patches based on polyisobutene and acrylic adhesives. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010;41:675–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu DG, Shen XX, Branford-White C, White K, Zhu LM. Annie Bligh SW. Oral fast-dissolving drug delivery membranes prepared from electrospun polyvinylpyrrolidone ultrafine fibers. Nanotechnology. 2009;20:055104–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu DG, Zhu LM, Branford-White CJ, Yang JH, Wang X, Li Y, Qian W. Solid dispersions in the form of electrospun core-sheath nanofibers. Int J Nanomed. 2010;6:3271–80.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi Y, Zhang J, Xu S, Dong A. Electrospinning of artemisinin-loaded core-shell fibers for inhibiting drug re-crystallization. J Biomat Sci-Polym E. 2012;. doi:10.1080/09205063.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Godin B, Touitou E. Transdermal skin delivery: predictions for humans from in vivo, ex vivo and animal models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59:1152–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kreilgaard M. Dermal Pharmacokinetics of micro-emulsion formulations determination by in vivo micro-dialysis. Pharm Res. 2001;18:367–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Liu Z, Du H, Zeng Y, Deng L, Xing J, Dong A. A novel hydrophilic adhesive matrix with self-enhancement for drug percutaneous permeation through rat skin. Pharm Res. 2009;26:1398–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo R, Du X, Zhang R, Deng L, Dong A, Zhang J. Bio-adhesive film formed from a novel organic-inorganic hybrid gel for transdermal drug delivery system. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;79:574–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tungprapa S, Jangchud I, Supaphol P. Release characteristics of four model drugs from drug-loaded electrospun cellulose acetate fiber mats. Polymer. 2007;48:5030–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoogstraate AJ, Verhoef J, Brussee J, IJzerman AP, Spies F, Boddé HE. Kinetics, ultrastructural aspects and molecular modelling of transdermal peptide flux enhancement by N-alkylazacycloheptanones. Int J Pharm. 1991;76:37–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang J, Liu M, Jin H, Deng L, Xing J, Dong A. In vitro enhancement of lactate esters on the percutaneous penetration of drugs with different lipophilicity. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:894–903.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kommuru R, Khan MA, Reddy IK. Racemate and enantiomers of Ketoprofen: phase diagram, thermodynamic studies, skin permeability, and use of chiral permeation enhancers. J Pharm Sci. 1998;87:833–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ren C, Fang L, Ling L, Wang Q, Liu S, Zhao L, He Z. Design and in vitro evaluation of an indapamide transdermal patch. Int J Pharm. 2009;370:129–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schulz M, Fussnegger B, Bodmeier R. Adsorption of carbamazepine onto crospovidone to prevent drug recrystallization. Int J Pharm. 2011;391:169–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Taghizadeh SM, Bajgholi S. A new Liposomal-Drug-in-adhesive patch for transdermal delivery of sodium diclofenac. J Biomat Nanobiotechnol. 2011;2:576–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Al-Saidan SM. Transdermal self-permeation enhancement of ibuprofen. J Control Release. 2004;100:199–209.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Charnay C, Bégu S, Tourné-Péteilh C, Nicole L, Lerner DA, Devoisselle JM. Inclusion of ibuprofen in mesoporous templated silica: drug loading and release property. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;57:533–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu DG, Zhang XF, Shen XX, Brandford-White C, Zhu LM. Ultrafine ibuprofen-loaded polyvinylpyrrolidone fiber mats using electrospinning. Polym Int. 2009;58:1010–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu DG, Yang JM, Branford-White C, Lu P, Zhang L, Zhu LM. Third generation solid dispersions of ferulic acid in electrospun composite nanofibers. Int J Pharm. 2010;400:158–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kolhe P, Misra E, Kannana RM, Kannan S, Lieh-Lai M. Drug complexation, in vitro release and cellular entry of dendrimers and hyperbranched polymers. Int J Pharm. 2003;259:143–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cilurzo F, Alberti E, Minghetti P, Gennari CGM, Casiraghi A, Montanari L. Effect of drug chirality on the skin permeability of ibuprofen. Int J Pharm. 2010;386:71–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Imani M, Lahooti-Fard F, Taghizadeh SM, Takrousta M. Effect of adhesive layer thickness and drug loading on estradiol crystallization in a transdermal drug delivery system. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2010;11:1268–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Taghizadeh SM, Soroushnia A, Mohamadnia F. Preparation and in vitro evaluation of a new fentanyl patch based on functional and non-functional pressure sensitive adhesives. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011;11:278–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cilurzo F, Gennari CG, Minghetti P. Adhesive properties: a critical issue in transdermal patch development. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012;9:33–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lin SY, Lee CJ, Lin YY. Drug-polymer interaction affecting the mechanical properties, adhesion strength and release kinetics of piroxicam-loaded eudragit E films plasticized with different plasticizers. J Control release. 1995;33:375–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maillard-Salin DG, Bécourt P, Couarraze G. A study of the adhesive–skin interface: correlation between adhesion and passage of a drug. Int J Pharm. 2000;200:121–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ho KY, Dodou K. Rheological studies on pressure-sensitive silicone adhesives and Drug-in-adhesive layers as a means to characterise adhesive performance. Int J Pharm. 2007;333:24–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81041085; 51103097).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhua Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, Y., Xu, S., Dong, A. et al. Design and in vitro evaluation of transdermal patches based on ibuprofen-loaded electrospun fiber mats. J Mater Sci: Mater Med 24, 333–341 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4805-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-012-4805-1

Keywords

Navigation