Skip to main content
Log in

Electric polarization and depolarization of solder, and their effects on electrical conduction

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

A Correction to this article was published on 21 April 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

This work provides the first report of the effect of the dielectric behavior on the conduction behavior of solder. The lead-free solder studied contains 96 wt% tin and 4 wt% silver. The electric polarization stems from the interaction of the valence electrons with the atoms. The fraction of valence electrons that participate in the initial polarization is of the order of 10–9. The injected electrons play a minor role compared to the valence electrons of the solder in the polarization. The efficiency of the injected electrons in promoting the polarization decreases with the increasing number of injected electrons. Due to the polarization under a constant applied DC current (30–100 mA), the apparent electrical resistivity increases beyond the true resistivity. The rate of apparent resistivity increase diminishes as the time of current application increases. The fractional increase is 0.10% at 130 s of 100-mA current application. The higher is the current, the greater are the degree and rate of polarization at a given time. The current effect saturates above ~ 90 mA. Upon reversal of the polarity of the applied current, depolarization (followed by reverse polarization) occurs. The rates of depolarization and reverse polarization, as indicated by the rate of apparent resistivity increase, increase with increasing current. These rates decrease with increasing time. At the same current and respective time, the rates of polarization and depolarization are essentially equal, but the rate of reverse polarization is much below that of the initial polarization. Furthermore, the nearly saturated degree of reverse polarization is much below that of the initial polarization. This indicates a partially irreversible effect of the initial polarization that hinders the reverse polarization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and material are available by contacting the corresponding author.

Change history

References

  1. W.J. Plumbridge, Solders in electronics. J. Mater. Sci. 31(10), 2501–2514 (1996)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Piezoresistivity and piezoelectricity, dielectricity discovered in solder. J. Mater. Sci. 30(5), 4462–4472 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Role of grain boundaries in the dielectric behavior of graphite. Carbon 173, 1003–1019 (2021)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Electret, piezoelectret, dielectricity and piezoresistivity discovered in exfoliated-graphite-based flexible graphite, with applications in mechanical sensing and electric powering. Carbon 150, 513–548 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Colossal electric permittivity discovered in polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon fiber, with comparison of PAN-based and pitch-based carbon fibers. Carbon 145, 734–739 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Effect of nickel coating on the stress-dependent electric permittivity, piezoelectricity and piezoresistivity of carbon fiber, with relevance to stress self-sensing. Carbon 145, 401–410 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.A. Eddib, D.D.L. Chung, Electric permittivity of carbon fiber. Carbon 143, 475–480 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Electret, piezoelectret and piezoresistivity discovered in steels, with application to structural self-sensing and structural self-powering. Smart Mater. Struct. 28(7), 075028 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Piezoresistivity and piezoelectricity discovered in aluminum, with relevance to structural self-sensing. Sens. Actuators A 289, 144–156 (2019)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G.A. Rinne, Issues in accelerated electromigration of solder bumps. Microelectron. Reliab. 43(12), 1975–1980 (2003)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Gan, W.J. Choi, G. Xu, K.N. Tu, Electromigration in solder joints and solder lines. JOM 54(6), 34–37 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Q.T. Huynh, C.Y. Liu, C. Chen, K.N. Tu, Electromigration in eutectic SnPb solder lines. J. Appl. Phys. 89(8), 4332–4335 (2001)

  13. Y. Hung, C. Chen, Electromigration of Sn-9wt.%Zn solder. J. Electronic Mater. 37(6), 887–893 (2008)

  14. J. Nah, J.H. Kim, H.M. Lee, K. Paik, Electromigration in flip chip solder bump of 97Pb-3Sn/37Pb-63Sn combination structure. Acta Mater. 52(1), 129–136 (2004)

  15. Y.H. Lin, C.M. Tsai, Y.C. Hu, Y.L. Lin, C.R. Kao, Electromigration-induced failure in flip-chip solder joints. J. Electronic Mater. 34(1), 27–33 (2005)

  16. J.R. Huang, C.M. Tsai, Y.W. Lin, C.R. Kao, Pronounced electromigration of Cu in molten Sn-based solders. J. Mater. Res. 23(1), 250–257 (2008)

  17. X. Xi, D.D.L. Chung, Dynamics of the electric polarization and depolarization of graphite. Carbon 172, 83–95 (2021)

  18. M. Abtew, G. Selvaduray, Lead-free solders in microelectronics. Mater. Sci. Eng. R 27(5–6), 95–141 (2000)

  19. C.M. Miller, I.E. Anderson, J.F. Smith, A viable tin-lead solder substitute: Sn-Ag-Cu. J. Electronic Mater. 23(7), 595–601 (1994)

  20. J. Yoon, J. Back, S. Jung, Comparative study of ENEPIG and thin ENEPIG as surface finishes for SAC305 solder joints. J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 29(6), 4724–4731 (2018)

  21. M. Reid, F. Punch, M. Collins, C. Ryan, Effect of Ag content on the microstructure of Sn-Ag-Cu based solder alloys. Solder. Surface Mount Technol. 20(4), 3–8 (2008)

  22. P.G. Kim, K.N. Tu, Fast dissolution and soldering reactions on Au foils. Mater. Chem. Phys. 53(2), 165–171 (1998)

  23. G. Chen, J. Ma, The mechanical behavior of Sn-Ag4 solder joints subjected to thermal cycling. Chin. J. Electron. 13(3), 416–418 (2004)

  24. W. Yang, R.W. Messler Jr, L.E. Felton, Microstructure evolution of eutectic Sn-Ag solder joints. J. Electron. Mater. 23(8), 765–772 (1994)

  25. W. Yang, D.D.L. Chung, Effect of temperature on the electrical conduction and dielectric behavior of solder (in press)

  26. D.D.L. Chung, X. Xi, Electric poling of carbon fiber with and without nickel coating, Carbon 162, 25–35 (2020)

  27. https://www.metallurgy.nist.gov/phase/solder/agsn-w.jpg (as viewed on Dec. 27, 2020)

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by New York State Department of Economic Development via New York State Center of Excellence for Materials Informatics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. D. L. Chung.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Yang declares that he has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. Chung declares that she has no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, W., Chung, D.D.L. Electric polarization and depolarization of solder, and their effects on electrical conduction. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 32, 6214–6227 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05337-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-05337-3

Navigation