Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A method for tool condition monitoring based on sensor fusion

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-sensor information fusion method for tool condition monitoring (TCM) using acoustic emission and cutting sound as monitoring signals. In order to make the cutting state in experiments closer to that in actual production, the traditional data acquisition method was improved. Using time–frequency analysis methods and multi-fractal theories, each kind of signal was filtered and their features were extracted according to characteristics respectively. The decision level fusion method was used for realizing information fusion by the model of support vector machines (SVMs) ensemble. Its base layer composes of two models of SVMs for regression (SVRs). Before training, the two SVRs were optimized by multiple population genetic algorithm including input features selection and model parameters optimization. Its decision layer is a model of SVM for classification or SVR, which is used for the combined decision according to the sub-decisions of SVRs in the base layer. The test results of SVMs ensemble show that the method can be used effectively for classification of tool wear condition and prediction of tool wear quantity. It can make information of the two sensors complement each other and is better than methods using a single sensor for TCM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agustin, G., Rodolfo, H., Rauldel, T., Pastora, V., & Andres, B. (2012). Tool wear monitoring using neuro-fuzzy techniques: A comparative study in a turning process. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 869–882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ai, C. S., Sun, Y. J., & He, G. W. (2012). The milling tool wear monitoring using the acoustic spectrum. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 61, 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahador, K., Alaa, K., Fakhreddine, O. K., & Saiedeh, N. R. (2013). Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art. Information Fusion, 14, 28–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskaran, J., Murugan, M., Balashanmugam, N., & Chellamalai, M. (2012). Monitoring of hard turning using acoustic emission signal. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(2), 609–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. C. (2000). An effective fuzzy-nets training scheme for monitoring tool breakage. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 11, 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danko, B., Dubravko, M., Toma, U., & Josip, K. (2012). Tool wear estimation using an analytic fuzzy classifier and support vector machines. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 23, 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federico, P., Alberto, P., Giorgio, P., & Fergal, D. (2010). Analysis of metal cutting acoustic emissions by time series models. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 48, 897–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsueh, Y. W., & Yang, C. Y. (2008). Prediction of tool breakage in face milling using support vector machine. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 37, 872–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., & Long, S. R. (1998). The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 454, 903–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jemielniak, K., Kwiatkowski, L., & Wrzosek, P. (1998). Diagnosis of tool wear based on cutting forces and acoustic emission measures as inputs to a neural network. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 9, 447–455.

  • Jose, V. A., & Fernando, R. S. (2010). A review of machining monitoring systems based on artificial intelligence process models. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 47, 237–257.

  • Li, B., Zhang, P. L., & Wang, Z. J. (2012). Morphological covering based generalized dimension for gear fault diagnosis. Nonlinear Dynamics, 67, 2561–2571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou, X. N., & Lin, C. J. (1997). An intelligent sensor fusion system for tool monitoring on a machining centre. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 13, 556–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammad, M., Simon, S. P., & Martin, B. G. J. (2009). Tool wear monitoring of micro-milling operations. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 4903–4914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, L. (2005). Mixed generalized dimensions of self-similar measures. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 306, 516–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitsikalis, V., & Maragos, P. (2009). Analysis and classification of speech signals by generalized fractal dimension features. Speech Communication, 51, 1206–1223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafezi, H., Behzad, M., & Akbari, J. (2012). Time domain and frequency spectrum analysis of sound signal for drill wear detection. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 4(5), 722–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehorn, A. G., Jin, J., & Orban, P. E. (2005). State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: A review. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 26, 693–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segeto, T., Simeone, A., & Teti, R. (2013). Multiple sensor monitoring in nickel alloy turning for tool wear assessment via sensor fusion. Procedia CIRP, 12, 85–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, V. S., Sharma, S. K., & Sharma, A. K. (2008). Cutting tool wear estimation for turning. Joural of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasa Pai, P., & Ramakrishna Rao, P. K. (2002). Acoustic emission analysis for tool wear monitoring in face milling. International Journal of Production Research, 40(5), 1081–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trabelsi, H., & Kannatey-Asibu, E, Jr. (1991). Pattern-recognition analysis of sound radiation in metal cutting. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 6, 220–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik, V. N. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Project of National Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 51275081, the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation under Grant No. 51335003, the Major Special Projects in the Scientific Innovation of Liaoning Province under Grant No. 201303004, and the Project of High-tech Industry Development and Tackling Key Plan of Science and Technology under Grant No. F13-01-21-00.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui-qun Yuan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Kf., Yuan, Hq. & Nie, P. A method for tool condition monitoring based on sensor fusion. J Intell Manuf 26, 1011–1026 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1112-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-015-1112-y

Keywords

Navigation