Skip to main content
Log in

Competition and Environmental Policy in the EU: Old Foes, New Friends?

  • Published:
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

European competition authorities consider environmental and competition policy to be complementary, as each has the objective of improving social welfare. Naturally, one would imagine that environmental considerations have already been accounted for in competition policy practice, but thus far, only in the case of voluntary environmental agreements. This paper analyzes the extent to which the two types of policy are complementary by examining the legal framework of competition policy, voluntary environmental agreements and three competition cases with equal relevance to the environment and then examines the basic theoretical economic observation that less competition implies lower pollution levels relative to more competition. This trade-off between the benefits of reduced emissions on the one side and increased competition on the other implies that disregarding environmental considerations in the implementation of competition policy entails a negative externality, which can be eliminated if environmental considerations are internalized in competition policy. The impact of the externality is found to depend on the emission level, the emission damage, and market size. Further, this implies that if competition authorities were to adopt a broad definition of the relevant market in competition cases, then environmental considerations would play a limited role in competition policy, whereas a narrow definition implies that environmental considerations should have a much more important place than competitive considerations in competition policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler JH (2004) Conservation through collusion: antitrust as an obstacle to marine resource conservation. Wash & Lee L Rev 61(2004)

  • Adler JH (2005) Conservation Cartels. Regulation, winter 2004–2005, 38–45

  • Amelio A, Donath D (2009) Market definition in recent EC merger investigations: the role of empirical analysis. Concurrences: Revue des droits de la concurrence 3:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Anton WR, Deltas G, Khanna M (2004) Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. J Environ Econ Manag 48(1):632–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol W, Oates W (1988) The theory of environmental policy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett P (2000) Anti-trust? European competition law and mutual environmental insurance. Econ Geogr 76(1):50–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop S, Walker M (2010) The economics of EC competition law: concepts, application and measurement. Sweet & Maxwell

  • Brau R, Carraro C (2001) Are voluntary agreements a threat to competition? In: Highley CJ, Leveque F (eds) Environmental voluntary agreements: research insights for policy-makers. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM), Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan JM, Tullock G (1975) Polluters’ profits and political response: direct control versus taxes. Am Econ Rev 65(1):139–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (1997) Commission notice on the definition of relevant market for the purposes of Community competition law. OJ C 372, 9.12.1997, p 5–13

  • EC (2011a) Guidelines on the applicability of article 101 of the treaty on the functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements. Official Journal C 11 of 14.1.2011

  • EC (2011b) Commission decision of 13.4.2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. COMP/39579 – Consumer Detergents, C (2011) 2528 final

  • EU (2004) Guidelines on the application of article 81(3) of the treaty. OJ 2004 C 101/97, para 13

  • Fennell L (2011) Ostrom’s Law: property rights in the commons. IJC 5(1)

  • Glachant M (2007) Non-binding voluntary agreements. J Environ Econ Manag 54:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen LG (2005) Aspects of the political economy of environmental voluntary agreements: a meta study. AKF (Institute of Local Government Studies), Copenhagen

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Karamanos P (2010) Voluntary environmental agreements: evolution and definition of a new environmental policy approach. J Environ Plan Manag 44(1):67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiew CC (2005) Contracts, combinations, conspiracies, and conservation: antitrust in oil unitization and the intertemporal problem. Northwest Univ Law Rev 99(2):931–970

  • Kingston S (2011) Greening EU competition law and policy. University College Dublin

  • Köhler J (2006) Detergent phosphates: an EU policy assessment. J Bus Chem 3(2):15–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann MA (2004) Voluntary environmental agreements and competition policy. Environ Resour Econ 28:435–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenstein MC, Suslow VY (2002) What determines cartel success? University of Michigan Working Paper 02–001, (http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstractid=299415)

  • Lyon TP (2013) The pros and cons of voluntary approaches to environmental regulation. Written for Reflections on Responsible Regulation Conference Tulane University March 1–2, 2013

  • Lyon TP, Maxwell JW (1999) ‘Voluntary’ approaches to environmental regulation: a survey. In: Franzini M, Nicita A (eds) Environmental economics: past, present, future. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Maks H (2002) The “new” horizontal agreements approach in the EU: an “economic” assessment. Intereconomics, January/February, 28–35

  • Massey P (2000) Market definition and market power in competition analysis: some practical issues. Econ Soc Rev 31(4):309–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter and May (2010) The EU competition rules on horizontal agreements. Slaughter and May, April 2010

  • NCA (2010) Competition policy and green growth: interactions and challenges. Report from the Nordic competition authorities, no. 1/2010

  • OECD (2010) Roundtable on horizontal agreements in the environmental context. OECD, DAF/COMP/WD (2010) 97

  • OECD (2011) Annual report on competition policy developments in the European Union, 2011. DAF/COMP/AR (2012)44, 6 August 2012

  • Pearce D (1991) The role of carbon taxes in adjustment to global warming. Econ J 101:938–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigou AC (1920) The economics of welfare. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck RS (1979) The cartelization of world commodity markets. Am Econ Rev 69(2):419–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerson K, Miceli TJ (1998) Voluntary environmental agreements: good news or bad news for environmental protection? J Environ Econ Manag 36:109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade ME (1989) Price wars in price-setting supergames. Economica 56(223):295–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slade ME (1990) Strategic models and interpretation of price-war data. Eur Econ Rev 34(2–3):524–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler G (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J Polit Econ 72(1):44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suslow VY (2005) Cartel contract duration: empirical evidence from inter-war international cartels. Ind Corp Chang 14(5):705–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ten Brink P (2002) Voluntary environmental agreements: process, practice and future use. Greenleaf, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner RK, Pearce D, Bateman I (1994) Environmental economics. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesper Fredborg Hurić-Larsen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hurić-Larsen, J.F., Münch, A. Competition and Environmental Policy in the EU: Old Foes, New Friends?. J Ind Compet Trade 16, 137–153 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-015-0201-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-015-0201-0

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation