Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Conservation of aquatic insect species across a protected area network: null model reveals shortfalls of biogeographical knowledge

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effective conservation of species requires some understanding of where populations occur in a landscape. Gaps in this knowledge base (the “Wallacean Shortfall” of some authors) may coincide with hotspots of diversity for different plant and animal species, requiring the cooperation of a number of different federal, state, local and non-governmental agencies for effective conservation. In this example, the distribution and abundance of benthic macroinvertebrates are widely used as metrics for water quality monitoring, but far less is known about these organisms qua species (taxonomic orders EPT—Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera). In this study, we inventoried a network of individual US National Park units for species in these orders. These parks are located in geological, ecological and historical places of interest across the states of Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. We sampled these parks in a multi-year intensive inventory in order to determine the composition of the aquatic insect fauna in each park. Since there are no comprehensive accounts of the geographic ranges of these species, we compiled published accounts of species occurrences in these and adjacent states (Arkansas, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, West Virginia) to construct a potential species pool for each state. This pool comprised our best estimate of the EPT species that might potentially occur in each state. We used these source pools to test null hypotheses on whether parks disproportionately under- or over-protect species in different categories of risk of imperilment. We find that parks have fewer rare (G1) species than expected from a null model, and parks over-protect some of the most common (G5) species in the network. This pattern would be expected if the actual landscape distributions of the most imperiled (G1) species are small and/or disjunct and tend to occur outside of the national parks in the region. Interactions between park shape (and size) and individual species geographic ranges are likely to influence the precision of estimates of the potential species pool within a protected area. More research is needed on the distribution of imperiled species across the entire geographic range of species, and the traditional practice of compilation and reporting of occurrence records by state is not sufficient for informed conservation practice. State natural heritage programs and biodiversity conservation database efforts (e.g. NatureServe) implicitly recognize the importance of species ranges, but our analysis demonstrates the need to assess these patterns at a finer spatial grain in order for these state lists to serve as meaningful expectations of the composition of species assemblages. Our analysis considers only a tiny fraction of the protected lands in the region, and an enormous additional area of protected lands exists where many of these rare species occur. More precise and accurate reporting of EPT species occurrences in this region will allow resource managers to target the conservation of particular species within single parks, or across protected area networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly DD, Loarie SR, Cornwell WK, Weiss SB, Hamilton H, Branciforte R, Kraft NJB (2010) The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography. Divers Distrib 16:476–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RT (1990) Insect endemism in the interior highlands of North America. Fla Entomol 73(4):539–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14(1):19–28. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01552.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Ecol 9(1):95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betten C, Kjellgren BL, Orcutt AW, Davis MB (1934) The caddis flies or Trichoptera of New York state (No. 292). The University of the State of New York

  • Brooks TM, Bakarr MI, Boucher T, Da Fonseca GAB, Hilton-Taylor C, Hoekstra NM, Moritz T, Olivieri S, Parrish SJ, Pressey RL, Rodrigues ASL, Sechrest S, Stattersfield A, Strahm W, Stuart SN (2004) Coverage provided by the global protected-area system: is it enough? Bioscience 54(12):1081–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown BL, Swan CM (2010) Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. J Anim Ecol 79:571–580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burks BD (1953) The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Bull Nat Hist Surv Div 26(1):1–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabeza M (2013) Knowledge gaps in protected area effectiveness. Anim Conserv 16(4):381–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y, DeWalt RE, Robinson JL, Tweddale T, Hinz L, Pessino M (2013) Using Maxent to model the historic distributions of stonefly species in Illinois streams: the effects of regularization and threshold selections. Ecol Model 259:30–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR (2011) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144(11):2647–2655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, MacNally R, Bond NR, Lake PS (2008) Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review. Freshw Biol 53:1707–1721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A, MacNally R, Bond NR, Lake PS (2010) Conserving macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: the importance of knowing the relative contributions of α and β diversity. Divers Distrib 16:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curler GR, Moulton JK (2010) Contributions to Nearctic Stupkaiella Vaillant (Diptera: Psychodidae). Zootaxa 2397:48–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison JE, Graumlich LJ, Rowland EL, Pederson GT, Breshears DD (2012) Leveraging modern climatology to increase adaptive capacity across protected area networks. Glob Environ Change 22:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt RE, Favret C, Webb DW (2005) Just how imperiled are aquatic insects? A case study of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in Illinois. Ann Entomol Soc Am 98(6):941–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt RE, Cao Y, Tweddale T, Grubbs SA, Hinz L, Pessino M, Robinson JL (2012) Ohio USA stoneflies (Insecta, Plecoptera): species richness estimation, distribution of functional niche traits, drainage affiliations, and relationships to other states. ZooKeys 178:1–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeWalt RE, Neu-Becker U, Steuber G (2013) Plecoptera species file online. Version 5(5.0), 6

  • ESRI (2011) ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Etnier DA, Baxter JT Jr, Fraley SJ, Parker CR (1998) A checklist of the Trichoptera of Tennessee. J Tenn Acad Sci 73(1–2):53–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Etnier DA, Parker CR, Baxter JT Jr, Long TM (2010) A review of the genus Agapetus Curtis (Trichoptera: Glossosomatidae) in eastern and central North America, with description of 12 new species. Insecta Mundi 0149:1–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber-Langendoen D, Nichols J, Master L, Snow K, Tomaino A, Bittman R, Hammerson G, Heidel B, Ramsay L, Teucher A, Young B (2012) NatureServe conservation status assessments: methodology for assigning ranks. NatureServe, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd MA, Moulton JK, Schuester GA, Parker CR, Robinson JL (2012) An annotated checklist of the caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) of Kentucky. J Ky Acad Sci 73(1):4–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint OS Jr, Hoffman RL, Parker CR (2004) An annotated list of the caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Virginia: part I, introduction and families of Annulipalpia and Spicipalpia. Banisteria 24:23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint OS Jr, Hoffman RL, Parker CR (2008) An annotated list of the caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Virginia: Part II. Families of Integripalpia. Banisteria 31:3–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Flint OS Jr, Hoffman RL, Parker CR (2009) An annotated list of the caddisflies (Trichoptera) of Virginia: part III. Emendations and biogeography. Banisteria 34:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer KS, Harris SC, Ward GM (1991) Survey of the Trichoptera of the Little River Drainage of Northeastern Alabama. Bull Alabama Mus Nat Hist 15(11):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander A, Nowlis JS, Sanchez JA, Appeldoorn R, Usseglio P, McCormick C, Bejarano S, Mitchell-Chui A (2003) Designing effective marine protected areas in Seaflower Biosphere Reserve, Colombia, based on biological and sociological information. Conserv Biol 17(6):1769–1784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frison TH (1935) The stoneflies, or Plecoptera, of Illinois. Bull Ill Nat Hist Surv 20(4):281–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Furrer R, Nychka D, Sain S (2012) Fields: tools for spatial data. Version 6.6.3. http://cran.r-project.org/

  • Guillot G, Rousset F (2013) Dismantling the mantel tests. Methods Ecol Evol 4(4):336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton SW, Morse JC (1990) Southeastern caddisfly fauna: origins and affinities. Fla Entomol 73(4):587–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L (2008) Protected areas and climate change. Ann NY Acad Sci 1134:201–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah L (2011) Climate change, connectivity and conservation success. Conserv Biol 25(6):1139–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris SC, O’Neil PE, Lago PK (1991) Caddisflies of Alabama. Bull Geol Surv Ala 142:1–442

    Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25(15):1965–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortal J, de Bello F, Diniz-Filho JAF, Lewinson TAM, Lobo JM, Ladle RJ (2015) Seven shortfalls that beset large-scale knowledge of biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 46:523–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton DC (2012) Biological diversity of the Minnesota caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera). Zookeys 189:1–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney MA, Sutton-Grier AE, Smith RF, Gresens SE (2009) Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality: the intersection of science and policy. Terr Arthropod Rev 2:99–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenat DR, Ruiter DE, Parker CR, Robinson JL, Beaty SR, Flint OS Jr (2012) Caddisfly (Trichoptera) records for North Carolina. Southeast Nat 9(2):201–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (2004) Conservation biogeography. In: Lomolino MV, Heaney LR (eds) Frontiers of biogeography: new directions in the geography of nature. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 293–296

    Google Scholar 

  • Lydeard C, Mayden RL (1995) A diverse and endangered aquatic ecosystem of the Southeast United States. Conserv Biol 9(4):800–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty WP (1977) Biosystematics of Dannella and related subgenera of Ephemerella (Ephemeroptera: Ephemerellidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 70(6):881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCafferty WP, Lenat DR, Jacobus LM, Meyer MD (2010) The mayflies (Ephemeroptera) of the southeastern United States. Trans Am Entomol Soc 136(3–4):221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal KA, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html

  • McKinney ML (2002) Influence of settlement time, human population, park shape and age, visitation and roads on the number of alien plant species in protected areas in the USA. Divers Distrib 8(6):311–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod E, Salm R, Green A, Almany J (2009) Designing marine protected area networks to address the impact of climate change. Front Ecol Environ 7:362–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JC, Stark BP, McCafferty WP (1993) Southern Appalachian streams at risk: implications for mayflies, stoneflies, caddisflies and other aquatic biota. Aquat Conserv 3:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JC, Stark BP, McCafferty WP, Tennessen KJ (1997) Southern Appalachian and other southeastern streams at risk: implications for mayflies, dragonflies, stoneflies and caddisflies. In: Bentz GW, Collins DE (eds) Aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective. Special Publication I, Southeastern Aquatic Research Institute. Lenz Design and Communications, Decatur, pp 17–42

  • NatureServe (2015) NatureServe explorer: an online encyclopedia of life [web application]. Version 7.1. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. http://www.natureserve.org/explorer. State Lists Accessed: 7 Dec 2011

  • Nichols BJ, Langdon KR (2007) The Smokies all taxa biodiversity inventory: history and progress. Southeast Nat 6(sp2):27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Wagner H (2011) Vegan: community ecology package. Version 2.0-1. http://cran.r-project.org/

  • Parker CR, Flint OS Jr, Jacobus LM, Kondratieff BC, McCafferty WP, Morse JC (2007) Ephemeroptera, Megaloptera, Plecoptera and Trichoptera of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Southeast Nat 6(S1):159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RL, Darling JDS (1985) The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Bioscience 35:707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Ross HH (1944) The caddisflies, or Trichoptera, of Illinois. Bull Ill Nat Hist Surv 23(1):1–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross HH (1953) On the origin and composition of the Nearctic insect fauna. Evolution 7:145–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross HH (1956) Evolution and classification of the mountain caddisflies. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross HH (1965) Pleistocene events and insects. In: Wright HE Jr, Frey DG (eds) The quaternary of the United States. VII Congress of the International Association for Quaternary Research, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, pp 583–596

  • Ross HH, Ricker WE (1971) The classification, evolution and dispersal of the winter stonefly genus Allocapnia. Ill Biol Monogr 45:1–166

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharkey MJ (2001) The all taxa biological inventory of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Fla Entomol 84(4):556–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark BP, Baumann RW, DeWalt RE (2009) Valid stonefly names for North America. http://plsa.inhs.uiuc.edu/plecoptera/validnames.aspx

  • VanDerWal J, Falconi L, Januchowski S, Shoo L, Storlie C (2014) SDMTools: species distribution modelling tools: tools for processing data associated with species distribution modelling exercises. Version 1.1-221. http://www.rforge.net/SDMTools/

  • Vinson MR, Hawkins CP (1998) Biodiversity of stream insects: variation at local basin and regional scales. Ann Rev Entomol 43:271–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JB, Merritt RW (1980) Filter feeding ecology of aquatic insects. Ann Rev Entomol 25:103–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JV, Stanford JA (1982) Thermal responses in the evolutionary ecology of aquatic insects. Ann Rev Entomol 27:97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou XL, Frandsen PB, Holzenthal RW, Beet CR, Bennett KR, Blahnik RJ, Bonada N, Cartwright D, Chuluunbat S, Cocks GV, Collins GE, deWaard J, Dean J, Flint OS Jr, Hausmann A, Hendrich L, Hess M, Hogg ID, Kondratieff BC, Malicky H, Milton MA, Moriniere J, Morse JC, Mwangi FN, Pauls SU, Gonzalez MR, Rinne A, Robinson JL, Salokannel J, Shackleton M, Smith B, Stamatakis A, StClair R, Thomas JA, Zamora-Munoz C, Ziesmann T, Kjer KM (2016) The Trichoptera barcode initiative: a strategy for generating a species-level Tree of Life. Philos Trans R Soc B. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0025

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Robinson JL, Geraci CJ, Parker CR, Flint OS Jr, Etnier DA, DeWalt RE, Jacobus LM, Hebert PDN (2011) Accelerated construction of a regional DNA-barcode reference library: caddisflies (Trichoptera) in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. J N Am Benthol Soc 30:131–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research would not have been possible without the assistance of many people. We would like to thank Jim Basinger, Jason Bunn, Bob Cherry, Melissa Geraghty, Daniel Jones, Rodney Martinez, Shepard McAninch, Lillian McElreath, Mary Shew and Rachel Vaughn for assistance with field collections. Ed DeWalt (University of Illinois, Illinois Natural History Survey, David Etnier (University of Tennessee), Luke Jacobus (Indiana University- Purdue University Columbus) and Boris Kondratieff (Colorado State University) provided invaluable taxonomic expertise and assistance with specimen identifications. The Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Tennessee provided travel and research money, as well as research and teaching assistantships to JLR. Highlands Biological Station provided a grant to JLR for summer research that was instrumental to this work. The United States Geological Survey and United States National Park Service contributed funding and support for this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Illinois Natural History Survey, Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, 61820, USA

    Jason L. Robinson

  2. Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, 37996, USA

    James A. Fordyce

  3. Sevierville, TN, USA

    Charles R. Parker

Authors
  1. Jason L. Robinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James A. Fordyce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles R. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason L. Robinson.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 3646 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Robinson, J.L., Fordyce, J.A. & Parker, C.R. Conservation of aquatic insect species across a protected area network: null model reveals shortfalls of biogeographical knowledge. J Insect Conserv 20, 565–581 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9889-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9889-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation